T.O. has to be the worse loss.

let me tell you what i think.......

On the Patriots..i think their system made Tom Brady. If Brady goes somewhere else i doubt he's half the quarterback. He's an above average QB at best. Without brady.....the patriots could just throw someone else in there and they'd probably do pretty good.

On the Eagles.....they suck for letting the loss of a Wide Receiver ruin their whole team structure. Its obvious that this team wasn't really good, just on a high. If you lose one player and you suddenly cant score over two touchdowns in a game.....you suck.

Brady is a really smart QB, but he doesn't do anything physically that even some reject QB from the Bears couldn't do. So TO would have to be the bigger loss. Especially when your next best WR is Pinkston.

Brady would be a huge loss for the Pat's and Ill tell you why.
The QB is the general on the field. Brady is an old school type onfield general. He's smart, savy, and a born leader.

What's that old war addage: You take out the leader, you take out the army.

ok, honestly people, the loss of a quarterback is more important than the loss of a reciever. the eagles have done just fine without TO, they're still in the superbowl!