PDA

View Full Version : Intellegence from Iraq


Echo2
09-20-2004, 11:24 AM
A recent National Intelligence Report stated that the best-case scenario at this point is an Iraq whose "political, economic and security stability would remain tenuous" (worst-case scenario: all-out civil war), to the apparently new tactic of blowing up journalists while they're reporting live on air, the situation in Iraq is far from rosy. Even Republicans like Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Dick Lugar (R-Ind) are criticizing Bush's policy in Iraq: "Our committee heard blindly optimistic people from the administration prior to the war and people outside the administration what I call the 'dancing in the street crowd' that we just simply will be greeted with open arms," he said. "The nonsense of all of that is apparent. The lack of planning is apparent." But hey, Our Great Leader is in charge so... don't worry about it!

Meanwhile, as combat rages across Iraq and American soldiers die at a rate of three a day, the Bush Administration is falling down on the job when it comes to catching the guy who the "war on terror" is supposed to be all about. Osama bin Laden is still at large, and, barring a special Karl Rove October Surprise, is likely to remain that way - that is, according to experienced CIA counterterrorism officer Michael Scheuer. Last week Scheuer sent a letter to Congress claiming that "the headquarters unit assigned to bin Laden has fewer experienced case officers now than on Sept. 11, 2001." Don't worry about it! In related news, George W. Bush has nominated Porter Goss to be the new head of the CIA. According to CBS News, "Last October, explaining why he did not want to launch an investigation of a White House official's possibly illegal leaking of a CIA officer's name to the press, Goss made reference to the Clinton impeachment saga. 'Somebody sends me a blue dress and some DNA, I'll have an investigation,' Goss said." Yes, Porter Goss sure seems like a man you can trust to take national security seriously and who will definitely not use it as some kind of partisan weapon to hammer Democrats with. Don't worry about it!

Travh20
09-20-2004, 04:27 PM
and your great answer to solve it all is elect kerry? oh never mind, your undecided

THE REF
09-20-2004, 04:36 PM
If Bush is responsible for all the military deaths in Iraq because of an unjust war then how many was Kerry responsible for in the nam war after he testified before the senate that there had been war crimes committed by our soldiers over there? You don't think that there was some retaliation on our pow's over that?

Echo2
09-20-2004, 04:37 PM
your - It is your business.

you're - You're undecided. It is a contraction.

Travh20
09-20-2004, 04:54 PM
LOL, ok, shall I start pointing out all you mistakes? your no william shakespear yourself echo

Echo2
09-20-2004, 04:58 PM
Originally posted by Travh20
LOL, ok, shall I start pointing out all you mistakes? your no william shakespear yourself echo

lol - prae had to show me how to spell idiot.

I was just trying to be helpful. I didn't make any nasty comments about it or anything. Sorry, didn't meen to offend you by it.

Travh20
09-20-2004, 05:10 PM
is been long established on this board that spelling corrections are not neccesarry, and grammer corrections are only done when you run out of arguments.

THE REF
09-20-2004, 05:18 PM
I see Echo has decided not to address the issue raised. Typical.

old-reb
09-20-2004, 05:43 PM
She simply moved the discussion to an area where she shines, garmmar and spelling.

old reb

HaVoK
09-20-2004, 06:04 PM
Originally posted by old-reb
She simply moved the discussion to an area where she shines, garmmar and spelling.

old reb LMAO!! I already like ole reb.

Echo2
09-20-2004, 06:31 PM
Originally posted by THE REF
If Bush is responsible for all the military deaths in Iraq because of an unjust war then how many was Kerry responsible for in the nam war after he testified before the senate that there had been war crimes committed by our soldiers over there? You don't think that there was some retaliation on our pow's over that?

First off, prove their was retaliation. The vietcong were so digustingly brutal that I doubt they could have got much worse.

Kerry was NOT responsible for sending any of them to war. He didn't start the illegal war and he didn't lie to the country about the resons for the war.
]YOur gonna have to try harder than that.

Trav - I didn't realize it was uncool to correcrt spelling. I really am sorry. I wasn't trying to insult you. I've had my spelling corrected many times on this board - probubly because I'm so bad at it.

old-reb
09-20-2004, 06:51 PM
Hello Echo,

I am sure president Bush is responsible for the deaths of our soldiers, Just as President Johnson was responsible for the loss of our soldiers in Vietnam.

The president is also responsible for the saftey of all Americans and since our country was founded,
we had to have soldiers die in defense of their country and families.

Should we fight Imperial Japan at midway or in California?

old reb

THE REF
09-20-2004, 07:12 PM
Originally posted by Echo2
First off, prove their was retaliation. The vietcong were so digustingly brutal that I doubt they could have got much worse.

Kerry was NOT responsible for sending any of them to war. He didn't start the illegal war and he didn't lie to the country about the resons for the war.
]YOur gonna have to try harder than that.

Trav - I didn't realize it was uncool to correcrt spelling. I really am sorry. I wasn't trying to insult you. I've had my spelling corrected many times on this board - probubly because I'm so bad at it.


Geez, Would the admin please install a spell checker to this forum.

You also should have used "There" instead of "their".

LionelHutz
09-20-2004, 09:47 PM
And the title of the thread is spelled wrong. :) (Just being a smart-ass)

THE REF
09-21-2004, 05:27 PM
Originally posted by LionelHutz
And the title of the thread is spelled wrong. :) (Just being a smart-ass)


Evidently not a whole lot of " Intellegence " went into the original post of this thread.

korg
09-25-2004, 08:40 PM
Originally posted by Travh20
LOL, ok, shall I start pointing out all you mistakes? your no william shakespear yourself echo man travh, sometimes you're the funniest dude on this site, that was some funny shit.....

Travh20
09-26-2004, 12:47 PM
it appears as long as the intelligence is bad for bush it is good. you would think people who are so pissed about the bad intelligence leading into the war would be a little leary about believing anything they put out