This guy acts guilty, but all they have is circumstantial evidence. But jeeze he acts guilty......

He reminds me of another famous defendant who was on trial for killing his wife. Who also sat through the entire trial with a smile on his face. Who also had very high powered lawyers against a less than stellar prosocution.

I guess the only big piece of missing, is will the ending turn out the same.

(Oh yeah, and if you don't know, I was referring to OJ Simpson.)

yeah, he acts as suspicious as oj, with that same dumb look on his face.......but i think that oj looked more guilty. this peterson guy is holding up pretty well, and if looks were a determining factor, this guy is innocent.......he's a cold calculating bastard. those phone calls to that woman just made the circumstantial evidence, less circumstantial......

Sick to death of people saying OJ is guilty.Most of the world says he is.Thank God there were 12 who said he was Innocent.Oj is doulde guilty because of who he supposely killed and Scott Peterson is half guilty because of who he is.Makes me think you want him to be guilty just because of who he is and who you say he killed.

Originally posted by goldy
Sick to death of people saying OJ is guilty.Most of the world says he is.Thank God there were 12 who said he was Innocent.Oj is doulde guilty because of who he supposely killed and Scott Peterson is half guilty because of who he is.Makes me think you want him to be guilty just because of who he is and who you say he killed.

Yes, there are always people who are unable to see the truth when it hits them in the face. Those 12 and you.

The jury didn't see fit to convict O.J. of anything. Case closed. It appears that the division between those believing he's guilty & those not believing is virtually drawn along racial lines. It's over & done with these many years later, why not just leave it alone? IMO, if he didn't do it, he most likely knows who did. That opinion and a buck will buy me a cold soda almost anywhere.

Originally posted by Echo2
This guy acts guilty, but all they have is circumstantial evidence. But jeeze he acts guilty......

The guy is innocent. OJ was innocent. A's fans completely out of line.

Originally posted by es347fan
The jury didn't see fit to convict O.J. of anything. Case closed. It appears that the division between those believing he's guilty & those not believing is virtually drawn along racial lines. It's over & done with these many years later, why not just leave it alone? IMO, if he didn't do it, he most likely knows who did. That opinion and a buck will buy me a cold soda almost anywhere.

If the glove don't fit you must aquit.

You are right, case closed.