John Forbes Kerry is unworthy to serve as America's Commander in Chief!

See Blog Indignant Wrath

www.indignantwrath.blopspot.com/

All the reasons are there!

I think it's a bad link, tdponder...

Change blopspot to blogspot and you'll get there.

Like this -- http://www.indignantwrath.blogspot.com/

Actually this guy's blog is quite interesting and for sure funny. Man what a sense of humor -- he shows a picture of himself at the top of the page and then later down the page he shows a pic of Michael Moore and says he looks like a train wreck. This dude seriouly needs to take a look in the mirror and learn the meaning of throwing stones and glass houses.

Thanks for the link -- I'm gonna have fun with this one.

Dop

Well, Dop, I can't say I that align myself with your political beliefs, but boy, I sure agree with you on this one. His fundamental argument is ok, but his points are weak (at best).

Man, reading his blog is mind-blowing but being an open minded follower of Bon (that's why I can watch Fox Praetorian :)) I managed to get most of the way through it. I guess "to each his own" applies here.

But -- he seriously needs to reorganize his site. It is one long contiguous read which jumps all over the place. He needs to chop it up, format it, add an index and guidance and whatever else is in vogue in the blog world. Maybe, I'll offer to do it for free for him and then when it's done, tell him I'm a left-wing whacko commie pinko pro glbt pro choice anti gun hollywood type nascar hater and see what he has to say. LOL.

Dop

It is heart breaking to here that you guys have difficulty in collecting your thoughts through your reading disorders.

Originally posted by tdponder
It is heart breaking to here that you guys have difficulty in collecting your thoughts through your reading disorders.
It is heart-breaking to see you to come in here, plug your blog, and then insult the people who think it's a crock of shit.

Anyone who thinks the truth about John Forbes Kerry is a crock of shit has already insulted himself and certainly does not need my assistance.

Originally posted by tdponder
Anyone who thinks the truth about John Forbes Kerry is a crock of shit has already insulted himself and certainly does not need my assistance.

Here's an example of the "truth" you present on your blog:

Let's see if his voting record
bears up under that promise ...

He voted to kill the Bradley Fighting Vehicle
He voted to kill the M-1 Abrams Tank
He voted to kill every Aircraft carrier laid down from 1988
He voted to kill the Aegis anti aircraft system
He voted to Kill the F-15 strike eagle
He voted to Kill the Block 60 F-16
He voted to Kill the P-3 Orion upgrade
He voted to Kill the B-1
He voted to Kill the B-2
He voted to Kill the Patriot anti Missile system
He voted to Kill the FA-18
He voted to Kill the B-2
He voted to Kill the F117


Unfortunately, you misrepresent the facts. This list of weapons systems that you claim Kerry voted to "kill", comes directly from the RNC, and is a blatant attempt to distort the truth.

Many people have repeated the charge that John Kerry voted against every major weapons system while in Congress.

This charge comes from the RNC and is calculated to portray Kerry as soft on defense.

The truth is, that 13 of the 16 systems that Kerry voted to cut, were part of a single appropriations bill in 1991, that the Republican administration urged Congess to cut.

Then Secretary of Defense Cheney in 1991:

"You've squabbled and sometimes bickered and horse-traded and ended up forcing me to spend money on weapons that don't fill a vital need in these times of tight budgets and new requirements."

Cheney went on to name the M-1 tank and the F-14 and F-16 fighters-- all of which appear on the RNC's list-- as "great systems" that "we have enough of."

Vice President Cheney in an interview with Fox News Channel's Brit Hume, March 2 2004:

"What we're concerned about, what I'm concerned about, is his record in the United States Senate, where he clearly has over the years adopted a series of positions that indicate a desire to cut the defense budget, to cut the intelligence budget, to eliminate many major weapons programs."

If you're going to profess to speaking the "truth" about someone td, perhaps you should not speak just that part of the truth which "appears" to support your argument. It undermines your credibility. Here is a link to factual information about the accusations of the RNC regarding John Kerry's vote to cut these systems. I look forward to seeing this information posted in your blog since you obviously want to post the truth about Kerry. :)

http://www.fair.org/press-releases/kerry-military-votes.html

You seemed to miss the point that I spoke of John Kerry's voting record. His motivation does not concern me. It is obvious he intended to cut back the military and the intelligence communiity as much as possible. His record SHOWS THAT! I stand by my published record.

Originally posted by tdponder
You seemed to miss the point that I spoke of John Kerry's voting record. His motivation does not concern me. It is obvious he intended to cut back the military and the intelligence communiity as much as possible. His record SHOWS THAT! I stand by my published record.

You definitely missed my point, but that doesn't surprise me.

Why present ALL the facts behind his defense vote when you can score more points by distorting the truth...