PDA

View Full Version : Hard to Find Women's March on Television News


Pepper
05-07-2004, 01:21 PM
Hard to Find Women's March on Television News


WASHINGTON - May 3 - On Sunday, April 25, hundreds of thousands of people filled the streets of Washington, D.C. to demonstrate for women's reproductive rights. Crowd estimates ranged from 500,000 to 1.15 million, but it was clear that the March for Women's Lives was one of the largest demonstrations in the capital's history-- and perhaps the largest ever. One might have expected, then, to see extensive coverage on national television-- but a look at both network and cable news during the days surrounding the march turned up remarkably few reports.

A Nexis search of the week surrounding the women's march found a total of six stories from the broadcast networks (not counting incidental mentions of the march): CBS ran one story the day of the march and two the next morning; NBC ran two stories and ABC only one, all on April 25. CNN, as a 24-hour cable news outlet, gave more extensive coverage to the event, running several reports on Sunday. But even CNN failed to treat the march as the historic occasion that it was, running just a small handful of brief march-related stories on Saturday and Monday.

Other cable news outlets focused not on the march itself but on abortion opponents, a few hundred of whom held a counter-protest at the march. Of three Fox News stories found on Nexis related to the march, two focused on anti-abortion activists (Special Report with Brit Hume, Hannity & Colmes, 4/22/04). Special Report examined anti-abortion opposition to the National Education Association's endorsement of the march-- a story that MSNBC also covered in that network's only march report found in the Nexis database. (Fox and MSNBC do not transcribe their news coverage as thoroughly as CNN does, so the amount of coverage on the three cable channels cannot be compared.)

To put the women's march coverage in perspective, FAIR conducted a similar Nexis search of the week surrounding the Promise Keepers march in 1997. The Promise Keepers, an evangelical men's organization that has been widely accused of promoting misogyny and homophobia, drew an estimated 480,000-750,000 demonstrators to Washington-- roughly three-quarters the size of the women's march. Despite its somewhat smaller size, the Promise Keepers received much more media attention: Stories began appearing on network news three days before the march and continued for two days afterward, with a total of 19 stories between the three networks-- more than three times the coverage the networks devoted to the women's march. Was the Promise Keepers march three times more newsworthy than the March for Women's Lives?

Why such little coverage? Women's issues routinely get short shrift in the media, and during this election year, news outlets found even more reason to discount women's voices. NBC Nightly News reporter Jeannie Ohm asked (4/25/04), "But just how big a factor will abortion rights have in the November election?... Political analysts say it's the economy and jobs, war in Iraq, homeland security and health care that will have more of an impact with undecided voters." CNN correspondent Elaine Quijano sounded a similar note (4/25/04): "This election year, each group hopes to spark renewed interest, enough to have an impact at the ballot box. But political analysts say more than three decades after Roe v. Wade, most voters have already made up their minds."

A record-breaking number of people-- mostly women-- marched on Washington to demonstrate their commitment to women's rights and their dissatisfaction with Bush's record on women's issues. By minimizing coverage of the event and reducing women's rights to a low-ranking concern in the presidential horse race, television news stifled critical public dialogue on women's rights and health, and relegated women and their concerns to the sidelines.

ACTION: Please let the networks know that you were disappointed by the scant coverage given to the historic March for Women's Lives.

CONTACT:

ABC World News Tonight Phone: 212-456-4040 mailto:PeterJennings@abcnews.com

CBS Evening News Phone: 212-975-3691 mailto:evening@cbsnews.com

NBC Nightly News Phone: 212-664-4971 mailto:nightly@nbc.com

The Republican
05-07-2004, 01:45 PM
What no link to Fox News?

Pretty sad when the left wing media has to write of their own base.

WhammyBar
05-07-2004, 04:33 PM
argghhh. that is so angering. that march was really great, there were so many people, and everyone was so enthused. and then nothing. how coul;d this ever be called liberal media? how could it even be called useful media?

LionelHutz
05-07-2004, 06:10 PM
There was lots of coverage in the local paper, and it's a pretty conservative rag. I guess the question is how much coverage is appropriate? Or what should the news networks be saying? Obviously coverage of the event is important, and that occurred. As far as generating other stories - it just wasn't an especially controversial event. There wasn't a lot of opposition, there's no big abortion issue currently in front of Congress or the Supreme Court - no greater context (at the moment) into which the march fits.

And keep in mind that the Promise Keepers got the coverage they did because of, and not in spite of, the mysogeny and homophobia angle, not to mention that groups of men acting in such a way is relatively novel.

Travh20
05-07-2004, 07:26 PM
pretty hard to find? I found it all over the place and I wasnt even looking. how else would I know it even happend? since I dont follow the upcoming demonstration schedule, how did I hear about it?

Darth Be'lal
05-08-2004, 12:08 AM
Dang, Pepper, I really must thank you.

I had no idea that Bush was telling women not to reproduce (no, no miss jane six pack, don't open your legs) and that the Promise Keepers was about hating BOTH women and homosexuals (wonder what they'll masturbate to now that they hate women and gays, pickups trucks maybe). God, how do I miss these things? Also I must thank you for the article insinuating that Bush has managed to gag the lib media on this women's march thing. Now if only Bush could gag the media about all the bad news coming out of Iraq, he'll be home free.

Pepper
05-10-2004, 12:42 PM
Also I must thank you for the article insinuating that Bush has managed to gag the lib media on this women's march thing. Now if only Bush could gag the media about all the bad news coming out of Iraq, he'll be home free.

Did anything in the article even mention bush and his influence of the media? Are you insinuating something that is not there, nor part of the discussion?

The same media will dedicate countless hours to and ending of a sitcom, that I think we both can agree has very little impact in our lives, but they ignore something that is probably the most highly contested issue in our country?

It's no wonder this country is so divided, there is no national attempt to gain a better understanding of the issue.

LionelHutz
05-10-2004, 06:45 PM
In all fairness, it's an issue that's been beat to death in the media in the last 30 years. I think the lack of coverage of the march has a lot to do with that. The news was the march itself, which was covered. The abortion debate is old news and therefore not newsworthy.