The list of questions grow....the answers are nowhere ......

DERELICTION of DUTY
THE EXODUS OF INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM
A TVNL CHALLENGE

In another time, there would have been questions. In another time, there might have been answers. But then again, in another time there were independent journalists.

In another time, there would have been outrage. In another time, there would have been headlines. But then again, in another time, there were relentless reporters.

But in our time, in the media, there are very few questions. In our time, in the media, there are even fewer answers. There is no outrage, and there are no blaring headlines. In our time, the government has a free hand to act with impunity and without accountability. But then again, in our time, George Bush and his PNAC cohorts are in power.

In our time, the public remains shamefully uninformed. In our time, the distractions, diversions, deceptions and delusions permeate the media. In our time, not asking is patriotic, and not knowing is the norm. If that continues, we will run out of time, in our time.

In our time, someone has to pick up the gauntlet. In that hope, TvNewsLies will review some of the questions that demand answers. We challenge the corporate media to openly and vigorously publicize the secrecy and stonewalling that have surrounded each of them. We challenge the media to pursue the answers to any or all of these questions, so that we may know the truth before the next presidential election. We also challenge the media to explain why we will not know the answers, at least not in our time.

THE QUESTIONS:...

http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/dereliction_of_duty.html

yes, that is why the new story of the US Gvoernmentknowing the name and phone number of one of the 9-11 hijakcer pilots is under teh headline "CIA knew about it" instead of "clinton administration had name and phone number of 9-11 hijacker in 1999". you know damn well if bush had that info before 9-11, adn 9-11 happened that all hell would break loose. it wouldnt read "CIA knew" it wuld read "George W Bush knew of 9-11 terror pilot and did nothing.

story (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/24/politics/24TERR.html?ei=5062&en=9301b48c937ada12&ex=1078203600&partner=GOOGLE&pagewanted=print&position=)

Uh. You've read the book, haven't you: If you can't explain Bush's actions, blame Clinton. Go read a better book and discover that Bush stopped the hunt for Al Qaeda members as soon as he came into office. He was out to end anything with Clinton's name on it.
But that's not even the issue. The attacks came under Bush's watch, not Clinton's. That's the bottom line. Live with it. And throw away that first book, it really makes you a poor debator.

LOL, jsut another clinton stooge as I expected. tell me genius, if bush was out to end anything with clintons name on it, why did he keep his worthless CIA director? or FBI director? there are many clintonistas still in the bush administration. why did clinton decide a freaking game of golf was more important than getting his hands on OBL? more than once! i really do hate clinton bashing, it is to easy, but it is the best way to point out the hypocrisy of the left, adn their double standards

oh, and thank god that the attack, happened with GW in charge, and not the idiot clinton who was too worried about golf and blow jobs to hunt any terrorists.