Rush Limbaugh gets totally PWN'D (http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/04/24/draft-limbaugh-gets-pwnd-by-caller-over-his-wishing-for-a-operation-chaos-and-white-riot-hangs-up-on-her/) by a caller over his "Operation Chaos" and wishing for "riots" at the Democratic convention. She very nicely and articulately takes him to task for being a hate-monger.

El Rushbo's grand comeback was to call her a "mush head".
How very reminiscent of some posters on here.

:lolhit:

SO that is where all the seminar callers come from...

Rush Limbaugh gets totally PWN'D (http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/04/24/draft-limbaugh-gets-pwnd-by-caller-over-his-wishing-for-a-operation-chaos-and-white-riot-hangs-up-on-her/) by a caller over his "Operation Chaos" and wishing for "riots" at the Democratic convention. She very nicely and articulately takes him to task for being a hate-monger.

El Rushbo's grand comeback was to call her a "mush head".
How very reminiscent of some posters on here.

:lolhit:
if the shoe fits, wear it, mush head:lolhit:

People still listen to Limp-baugh?

People still listen to Limp-baugh?

I thought he went out of style with powdered wigs.

I like Rush, he is good. It seem sthe more right he is the more hatred for him there is.

He's a master at digging dirt on democrats and liberals. I just wish he would acknowledge that the things he accuses them of doing, his very own beloved republican party is also just as guilty. He's right most of the time, but he's also purposely ignorant of putting things into context.

I agree, when it comes to dirt slinging politics he is as bad as any of the worst dems. But when it comes to views on life, and what it takes to succeed and his love for America he is right on.

I much prefer Randi Rhodes who describes the cart collectors at grocery stores as "retarded".

I agree, when it comes to dirt slinging politics he is as bad as any of the worst dems. But when it comes to views on life, and what it takes to succeed and his love for America he is right on.
I couldn't agree more.

I much prefer Randi Rhodes who describes the cart collectors at grocery stores as "retarded".

That is a little rude, but it does not compare to inciting riots.

I like Rush, he is good. It seem sthe more right he is the more hatred for him there is.

So you think he is right to wish for riots in an American city (including "burning cars") just to help his political party?

He's a master at digging dirt on democrats and liberals. I just wish he would acknowledge that the things he accuses them of doing, his very own beloved republican party is also just as guilty. He's right most of the time, but he's also purposely ignorant of putting things into context.

My Overall theorem on Political Party's is :



Democrats Lie
Republicans Talk Turkey


I've yet to be proven wrong on that.
Limbaugh is merely validating my Theorem.
Is All

Rush Limbaugh gets totally PWN'D by a caller over his "Operation Chaos" and wishing for "riots" at the Democratic convention. She very nicely and articulately takes him to task for being a hate-monger.

The astounding thing here is not that some person exposed this worthless pathological liar and sadistic fucking sack of human offal for what he is, but that he actually allowed someone who disagreed with him to speak on the air.

http://www.topplebush.com/humor/rushinlimbo2.jpg

http://www.passionateamerica.com/pictures/LuckovichRush.jpg

So you think he is right to wish for riots in an American city (including "burning cars") just to help his political party?

Limbaugh does have a huge problem admitting err.
It's his achilles' heel.He suffers the sin of Pride.
I doubt he can overcome it.It's part of his charm.
As if making his persona tick.

The woman caller also said she was a regular listener for years.
She was obviously Lying.Her entire intent was to push into
Limbaughs face,an obvious faux pas {meant as humor} that wasn't
Too funny and WAS inappropriate.
Limbaugh is just too priggish proud to concede to a mere caller,
a seminal caller ta boot,and make ammens for bein a bit of an a$$.
Yes,Limbaugh can be an a$$.
He's not exempt,even though he's obviously convinced himself
udderwise .... DAILY !

The astounding thing here is not that some person exposed this worthless pathological liar and sadistic fucking sack of human offal for what he is, but that he actually allowed someone who disagreed with him to speak on the air.

http://www.topplebush.com/humor/rushinlimbo2.jpg

http://www.passionateamerica.com/pictures/LuckovichRush.jpg

Well, he did hang up on her eventually, after struggling to come up with his profound comeback of "mush head".

If one believes he really wants riots and also believes he has the power to incite them then this is a very bad thing he has done.

If one believes he really wants riots and also believes he has the power to incite them then this is a very bad thing he has done.

I take him at his word and I do not underestimate the stupidity of people who proudly wear the title "dittohead".

:thumbs:

So then you do feel that was his intention and that he does have the power to accomplish such?

So then you do feel that was his intention and that he does have the power to accomplish such?

Now you are just repeating yourself.

Now you are just repeating yourself.
Good dodge.

Real answer please?

Good dodge.

Real answer please?

I won't repeat myself. See post #18.

I think I understand now.

You feel that Rush Limbaugh wants violent riots at the Democrat Convention and also believe that Rush Limbaugh has the power to cause them.

Okey-doke.

I think I understand now.

You feel that Rush Limbaugh wants violent riots at the Democrat Convention and also believe that Rush Limbaugh has the power to cause them.

Okey-doke.

That took long enough to sink in.

The only way Limp-baugh might incite a riot is to streak the dem convention. Even then it might not be a riot as much as panic.

I agree, when it comes to dirt slinging politics he is as bad as any of the worst dems. But when it comes to views on life, and what it takes to succeed and his love for America he is right on.

C'mon Trav. We're waiting for your answer.

Do you support Rush Limbaugh's wish for riots/burning of cars/destruction of other property in American cities?

Do you support Rush Limbaugh's wish for riots/burning of cars/destruction of other property in American cities?
No more so than you'd support Randi Rhodes for her "wish" that American troops return home in a body bag to bolster her party's position on the war in Iraq. Limbaugh was guilty of essentially doing the same thing. Both comments made were political, and both comments made were disgusting (however, not equally, IMHO).

No more so than you'd support Randi Rhodes for her "wish" that American troops return home in a body bag to bolster her party's position on the war in Iraq. Limbaugh was guilty of essentially doing the same thing. Both comments made were political, and both comments made were disgusting (however, not equally, IMHO).

I've never claimed to support Randi Rhodes over any nutty thing she says or does. Trav, on the other hand, has stated that Mr. Limbaugh is "right on" when it comes to his "views on life, and what it takes to succeed and his love for America."

Big difference. :)

I've never claimed to support Randi Rhodes over any nutty thing she says or does. Trav, on the other hand, has stated that Mr. Limbaugh is "right on" when it comes to his "views on life, and what it takes to succeed and his love for America."

Big difference. :)
Fair enough - I can certainly understand that. I found myself immediately agreeing with Trav, but I can see how making a statement like that would detract (and rightfully so) from Trav's point.

That took long enough to sink in.
What a putz. :rolleyes:

What a putz. :rolleyes:
Dhrama also think Rush can fly and shoot lasers out of his eyes.:@@:

Dhrama also think Rush can fly and shoot lasers out of his eyes.

You are such a "dhrama" queen. :rolleyes:

So you think he is right to wish for riots in an American city (including "burning cars") just to help his political party?

No , I do not always agree with everything he says, but I do feel he is right about many things.

No , I do not always agree with everything he says, but I do feel he is right about many things.

Your original quote that I was responding to was:

I like Rush, he is good. It seem sthe more right he is the more hatred for him there is.

So you admit that this is not one of the times when he is supposedly "right"?

Dear gullible fans, I Rush Limbaugh don't care whether or not you know the truth about anything. In fact, I take great pains to see to it you don't. I tell you what you want to hear. I Rush Limbaugh will generate lies,contortions and baseless hate speech to get you to listen. I Rush Limbaugh don't have much need for the facts. Actually I hate them...but do keep listening...my sponsors love it! :worship:

I Rush Limbaugh will generate lies,contortions and baseless hate speech...
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v281/queun/_41225182_mongolia_416_afp1.jpg

You are such a "dhrama" queen. :rolleyes:
you're the maroon that thinks he can start riots....amongst ppl that don't like him, no less:lolhit:

you're the maroon that thinks he can start riots....amongst ppl that don't like him, no less

You really need to stop trying to put words in my mouth.

I never said he can start them "among ppl that don't like him".

You really need to stop trying to put words in my mouth.


I think I understand now.

You feel that Rush Limbaugh wants violent riots at the Democrat Convention and also believe that Rush Limbaugh has the power to cause them.

Okey-doke.

That took long enough to sink in.
wtf is that?

I never said he can start them "among ppl that don't like him".

you agreed with Brooks that you feel that he can. you should pay more attention to what you write.

Mike,

I repeat.

I never said he can start riots "among ppl that don't like him".

You should really pay more attention to what I write.

:thumbs:

dharma is in full flea mode... let him run out of the back door and run from an argument he can't win. He'd rather redirect an argument, or go in detail on a technicality than admit he's wrong on a broad topic.

Rush is partisan, no doubt. He needs to acknowledge that republicans aren't all good, and that all politicians, well.. almost all, are in the same boat. Trav is correct in saying that Rush is right on some accounts.. I agree with a few things Rush says during a broadcast if I happen to catch him on my way home from school.. but I also sit there and am just in awe on how partisan he is. Even though he is RIGHT, he's irresponsible.

Oh, and that picture, about getting kicked off ESPN... he might have gotten kicked off, but he had a valid point. Donovan McNabb was playing horrible, but yet was the most visible element to the NFL. He was being crammed down our throats even though he sucked for the first entire half of that season. Take that into account plus that fact that the NFL benefits from having an african american hero to promote.... and it WAS a "social issue", as rush had the balls to say and was kicked off ESPN for actually saying it.

Mike,

I repeat.

I never said he can start riots "among ppl that don't like him".

You should really pay more attention to what I write.

:thumbs:
back pedal all you want, it won't do you any good:bike:

back pedal all you want, it won't do you any good

Why should I bother to say anything at all, when you can just make it all up yourself and tell me what I am going to say? :rolleyes:

Why should I bother to say anything at all, when you can just make it all up yourself and tell me what I am going to say? :rolleyes:
it would be nice if one of us had an idea what you were saying.:thumbs:

dharma is the kind of guy who would call the guy who calls out a liar "being defensive"...

it would be nice if one of us had an idea what you were saying.

I know exactly what I mean to say but you seem to be happier just making up other things for me to "say" in your imagination.

I know exactly what I mean to say but you seem to be happier just making up other things for me to "say" in your imagination.
hey! you're the one that agreed with Brooks....again:bike:

Mike, I have even agreed with you on occasion

you're the maroon that thinks he can start riots....amongst ppl that don't like him, no less:lolhit:
Just to clarify, I think what our dear, retarded friend Dharma was trying to say is that he believes Rush has "the power to start riots at the DNC" by summoning the barbarian conservative hordes to Denver in a clandestine effort to help them pull off the second most nefarious act ever perpetrated by the GOP (outside of 9/11, of course); to act like democrats.

Yes, you heard me correctly. His contention isn't that Rush has "the power to make democrats act like the intercity masses they represent", but that he has "the power to make 'undercover' conservatives act like they do (at their convention, no less)".

Spooooooooooky, I tell ya. :eek: :rolleyes:

There is only one way to gt rid of nuclear weapons...use them'--Rush Limbaugh

I can't believe that anyone in this day and age still listens to a drug addict who is just interested in selling books and airtime! He is just using you.

I can't believe that anyone in this day and age still listens to a drug addict who is just interested in selling books and airtime! He is just using you.
that was Obama a few years ago...with the exception of selling airtime.

There is only one way to gt rid of nuclear weapons...use them'--Rush Limbaugh
it's a pity you can't unlearn something.

that was Obama a few years ago...with the exception of selling airtime.

I thought we were talking about Rush..

and what if i don't support obama.. now what? rush is great then? Your comment makes no sense.

I thought we were talking about Rush..

and what if i don't support obama.. now what? rush is great then? Your comment makes no sense.
i'm just saying the man sold some books, one of he admits to using drugs in.

i'm just saying the man sold some books, one of he admits to using drugs in.

ok so obama is wrong.. what does that make rush? right? again your comment makes no sense in the discussion.
we were talking about rush.

ok so obama is wrong.. what does that make rush? right? again your comment makes no sense in the discussion.
we were talking about rush.
it's just a minor comparison..they both sold some books, and have unlawfully ingested some things they shouldn't have.

iow-BFD, don't like Rush, don't listen to him. 3/4 of his regular listeners appear to be flaming liberals anyways.:bike:

it's just a minor comparison..they both sold some books, and have unlawfully ingested some things they shouldn't have.

iow-BFD, don't like Rush, don't listen to him. 3/4 of his regular listeners appear to be flaming liberals anyways.:bike:


Yes, but Rush's only goal is to be an entertainer..that is all he is.

By the way, I think Bill Mahr has completely lost his mind. I heard him in one show say that "All prescription medicines are bad".

By the way, I think Bill Mahr has completely lost his mind. I heard him in one show say that "All prescription medicines are bad".
i gave up on Bill just before 9/11. it started to seem forced instead of just his honest opinions.

i gave up on Bill just before 9/11. it started to seem forced instead of just his honest opinions.

I guess I never listened to him or ANY other talking head on either side so I do not know what he said before 911. But I find him so annoying.

No doubt Rush is an entertainer and has had drug problems.

So I guess that "old drug addict" Bill Clinton who "never inhaled" and "didn't have sexual relations with that woman" should be taken out to the back of the shed and shot.

Well, that would be the best option for the Clinton campaign, anyway.

And what about Ted Kennedy? LMAO

i'm just saying the man sold some books, one of he admits to using drugs in.
There is a world of difference between trying drugs in college and being an adult drug addict who's addiction caused him to lose his hearing for a time.

No doubt Rush is an entertainer and has had drug problems.

So I guess that "old drug addict" Bill Clinton who "never inhaled" and "didn't have sexual relations with that woman" should be taken out to the back of the shed and shot.

Well, that would be the best option for the Clinton campaign, anyway.

And what about Ted Kennedy? LMAO


Just because the others are bad too, does not make it ok for Rush! You guys always have the "well he did it too!!" response. It does not make it ok.

The only way Limp-baugh might incite a riot is to streak the dem convention. Even then it might not be a riot as much as panic.

ROFL!

Hehe that guys the biggest idiot on radio i know!

Your original quote that I was responding to was:



So you admit that this is not one of the times when he is supposedly "right"?

Hey, you are catching on! :rolleyes:

Just because the others are bad too, does not make it ok for Rush! You guys always have the "well he did it too!!" response. It does not make it ok.

The difference is.. the other people I mentioned have been nominated to vital government positions.. while Rush is merely an entertainer.

Quit bitching about some guy on AM radio, which nobody listens to, and if you have beef with people who lie, or have drug/alcohol problems.. there are PLENTY of places to start...

Quit bitching about some guy on AM radio, which nobody listens to, and if you have beef with people who lie, or have drug/alcohol problems.. there are PLENTY of places to start...

I'm not bitching. Read the title of this thread, its about Rush. I did not start the thread and I posted in the appropriate place. Logic i know is lost.

There is a world of difference between trying drugs in college and being an adult drug addict who's addiction caused him to lose his hearing for a time.
there's also a world of difference between recreational drugs and prescription pain killers taken as pain killers.

there's also a world of difference between recreational drugs and prescription pain killers taken as pain killers.
a. Not anymore there isn't. Prescription drugs are the new recreational drugs for kids.

b. Rush was arrested for fraud in obtaining a prescription for "doctor shopping" and then copped a deal with authorities in order to avoid an official conviction.

Supposedly prescription drugs are now the most widely abused among teenagers. I believe it, done a few of 'em myself.

Supposedly prescription drugs are now the most widely abused among teenagers. I believe it, done a few of 'em myself. What a shocker!:lolhit:

There's no way prescription drugs are used more than weed and alcohol by teenagers. 0% chance.

Quit bitching about some guy on AM radio, which nobody listens to....

According to Talkers Magazine, somewhere between 13 and 18 million people per week listen (unfortunately) to the pathological liar in question.

That's roughly one fourth of the number of ignoramuses it takes to send a failed businessman/former cocaine user/AWOL from the National Guard/lying about WMDs so as to foment a war/extreme Rightwing imbecile to the White House.

__________________

The corporate and governing elites are helping themselves to the spoils of victory. Politics, when all is said and done, comes down to who gets what and who pays for it -- while the public is distracted by the media circus and the news has been neutered or politicized for partisan purposes. Take the paradox of a Rush Limbaugh; ensconced in a Palm Beach mansion inciting the resentment nationwide of white-knuckled wage earners, who are barely making ends meet in no small part because of the very policies of those Corporate and ideological forces for whom Rush has been an unflagging cheerleader.

there's also a world of difference between recreational drugs and prescription pain killers taken as pain killers. What about him having his maid do a drug deal in the Denny's parking lot at 3 in the morning? He must have been having some bad pain!:o

There's no way prescription drugs are used more than weed and alcohol by teenagers. 0% chance. DF said abused not used.

According to Talkers Magazine, somewhere between 13 and 18 million people per week listen (unfortunately) to the pathological liar in question.

That's roughly one fourth of the number of ignoramuses it takes to send a failed businessman/former cocaine user/AWOL from the National Guard/lying about WMDs so as to foment a war/extreme Rightwing imbecile to the White House.


he is the most listened to person on AM radio, but what is that? MTV probably gets 50 times that.

failed businessman? That's a stretch, he was in on ownership of the Texas Rangers.. did they go under?

Former cocaine user? Why don't you give him the benefit of the doubt like other presidents... he probably "never inhaled"...

AWOL? Better than not serving at all. The whole "service = presidency" thing is not proven. Ulysses S. Grant sucked as a prez, John Kerry wasn't looking to good.. You don't need a shining 5-star general to be a president.

And you cannot prove he lied about Weapons of Mass Destruction, you irresponsible, agenda-ridden twit. It's a theory of yours, which you are welcome to, but quit making your theories off as fact. Your mom is a whore, that's a fact, because I said so;)

Your mom is a whore, that's a fact, because I said so;)
I respect those who want to debate, their stances and issues ... I don't exaggerate to the extreme ... I'm actually a responsible poster ... You have to take emotion and personal bias out of the equation and just deal with the issues and the demeanor.:eek:

You forget, Sedan, that I am talking to FT, probably among the most irresponsible posters on here. The reason I said that is to point out just HOW irresponsible his posts are.

Bush failed in the oil business and had to get his daddy(who happened to be the president at the time) to bail him out. He probably would have gone to prison otherwise.

You forget, Sedan, that I am talking to FT, probably among the most irresponsible posters on here.I don't care who you're talking to -- you don't live up to your own self-description.

I do, sometimes, because I healthily debate with all those who respect me back, and have good demeanor. Someone I've debated with, or just argued with, like FT for years.. I think I know if there is "a good healthy debate" behind most of his claims.

However, You won't back me in a corner saying I'm perfect, because I know I'm not. I have humility, honesty, and kindness. Was that post of bad taste? Yes. Did it kind of hurt to write it? yes. However, it referenced back to another convo FT and I had, and also was serious enough to prove my point. I don't actually think that.. but the reasoning is pretty much the same.

But I appreciate the cross-examination Sedan;)

Read the title of this thread, its about Rush. I did not start the thread and I posted in the appropriate place.
Hey, my Obama thread turned into a NASCAR discussion, while my Wright thread became a restaurant-tipping debate.

Figure that out.

...you don't live up to your own self-description.

I do, sometimes

Then you don't. :)

Then you don't. :)

I'm not egotistical enough to consider myself perfect... hence the sometimes.

It's a shame people have gotten used to that kind of attitude in here.

I try my best, but when somebody is purposefully disrespectful to things that are held dear to others.. I will make fun of something held dear to him. An eye for an eye? Normally I'm a pacifist, but this is the freakin internet, and this is a debate forum... I'll be able to sleep at night.

Hey, my Obama thread turned into a NASCAR discussion, while my Wright thread became a restaurant-tipping debate.

Figure that out.
Ok. People got bored with your topics.

Brooks: "You feel that Rush Limbaugh wants violent riots at the Democrat Convention and also believe that Rush Limbaugh has the power to cause them?"
Dhrama: "That took long enough to sink in."

I was just thinking....
If you think he wants to, and you think he can, you must believe riots will happen.

Can I hold you to that?

I was just thinking....

That does seem problematic for you...


If you think he wants to, and you think he can, you must believe riots will happen.

Can I hold you to that?

No.

No.
Wow - what a shocker...:rolleyes:

Thanks for being reliably inconsistent and illogical, dumbass, for we'd expect nothing less from you.