I did not change anything in that quote.

Quit your damn whining.

You got called out for your "dhrama" and now you are acting like a 4 year old throwing a temper tantrum.

wow...

just wow...

If one person says something, it's nothing

If two people say something, it's a trend.

If three people say something, you should look to see if it's true.

there are many more than three people who think you are immature in here dharm... i'd take a look in the mirror.

Originally Posted by dharmabum
So this was a lie?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Travh20
Yes, it is a lie...


Ok, just making sure.




Please refer to post 88, then look at what you quoted in post 89, did you or did you not take part of sentence and comment on it out of context? And just so you can not change it I will quote post 89 here.

and once again, I mention a 5 year old, and you turn around and call me a 4 year old. You are predictable if nothing else.

Originally Posted by dharmabum
So this was a lie?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Travh20
Yes, it is a lie...


Ok, just making sure.




Please refer to post 88, then look at what you quoted in post 89, did you or did you not take part of sentence and comment on it out of context? And just so you can not change it I will quote post 89 here.

and once again, I mention a 5 year old, and you turn around and call me a 4 year old. You are predictable if nothing else.

From Ann Coulter's 'How To Talk To A Liberal (If You Must)'

"If you can somehow force a liberal into a point-counterpoint argument, his retorts will bear no relation to what you've said -- unless you were in fact talking about your looks, your age, your weight, your personal obsessions, or whether you are a fascist. In the famous liberal two-step, they leap from one idiotic point to the next, so you can never nail them. It's like arguing with someone with Attention Deficit Disorder." -- P. 3

How true it is!!

no man, I said I don't take my family to SF, weren't you paying attention?
You don't have to take your family to be at a "family event". In any case, where did you get the idea that this is a regular occurrence in San Francisco? All BDSM-oriented events I hear about are planned well in advance, and are usually advertised as such. As someone who has never been to San Francisco (or even within a few hundred miles of it), I must profess ignorance about the place, and if you could provide me with a source for family-oriented events that turn into risque parades, I'd like to see it.

By the way, Dharma? Shut the fuck up. Your assholishness is quite unwarranted. You can get your point across and/or ask questions without being a dick. Why don't you?

Trav,

I have a better idea, instead of your usual tactic of trying to make this about me, how about you back up your own statement for a change?

They have "family" events that turn out to be whip and leather parades. SF is a joke. If that is what "real" liberalism has in store for us count me out.

By the way, Dharma? Shut the fuck up.

No.

Your assholishness is quite unwarranted.

Neither is yours.

Practice what you preach.

dharmabum,

You are being especially stupid today and for you that is really saying something.

When someone says they have family events in SF there is no logical leap saying that person has attended such events any more than there would if someone said they have roller coaster rides at King's Dominion. Both the events and the roller coasters exist whether the poster has been to one or on the other.

I think he objected to the line "They have "family" events that turn out to be whip and leather parades." I do as well; it's complete and total BS. Period.

well as my good friend Dhrama likes to say, " I know a guy...."

I think he objected to the line "They have "family" events that turn out to be whip and leather parades." I do as well; it's complete and total BS. Period.

I think he was talking about how they are advertised not whether or not families go to an event and it suddenly turns into an S and M fest.

well as my good friend Dhrama likes to say, " I know a guy...."

Don't blame me because I get out once in a while and socialize.

SItting home and talking to your imaginary friends is not socializing.

SItting home and talking to your imaginary friends is not socializing.

Then don't do it.

This has been enjoyable, but I have to go fly a kite. :)

Hopefully around high tension wires.

Then don't do it.

This has been enjoyable, but I have to go fly a kite. :)

Gee, you must be a mind reader. I was just going to suggest you go do that.



:lolhit:

dharma needs maturity.. and quick....
No he doesn't; he needs a swift banning. No one here (and I do mean NO ONE) actually "enjoys" interacting with that asshole. If you disagree with him, then it doesn't matter - YOU'RE WRONG (no matter how thoroughly you handed him his ass in debate), and I, for one, am sick & tired of having to ignore his banal platitudes and nasty mouth.

In short, he's an obstinate punk who needs to be shown the door, end of story. The funny thing is, I've never felt this way about another poster.

I've said it before, and absolutely agree about dharma.. he can do no wrong, his ego will not allow it. Perhaps we should make a poll to see how many people want dharma banned.

No he doesn't; he needs a swift banning. No one here (and I do mean NO ONE) actually "enjoys" interacting with that asshole. If you disagree with him, then it doesn't matter - YOU'RE WRONG (no matter how thoroughly you handed him his ass in debate), and I, for one, am sick & tired of having to ignore his banal platitudes and nasty mouth.

In short, he's an obstinate punk who needs to be shown the door, end of story. The funny thing is, I've never felt this way about another poster.

So you really like him then, right?

P.S. Is that really your mug I see as your avatar?

I will reserve futher comment.

I enjoy reading Dharmas post, I find him intelligent and funny.

You guys need to 'chill out' I think the term is.

I dont want to ban him, he is to entertaining.

I vote for NOT banning Dahrma. Censorship is something Tipper Gore would do, for cryin out loud. Haven't we moved beyond that kind of crap?

I agree. Don't ban him. Even though the guy is a tool, there is no law against being a tool.

I agree with CBL, this is definitely due to the sue-happy culture we live in, which I don't think is the fault of people on just one side of the fence.
No doubt, but that reality, my friend, was DIRECTLY created by the democrats. They're the ones who love (and push for) excessive punitive damages that make the rest of the planet laugh at our stupid asses. E.g. - paying a sheet metal worker who lost his hand 26 million dollars (ostensibly for "lost wages" and "pain & suffering" :rolleyes: ). Having said that, it's no wonder why trial lawyers back the democrats (because their legislation directly allows those ambulance-chasers to take home roughly 15 to 20% of the settlement (after taxes). That's exactly what's fostered this "sue-happy culture we live in").

Bullshit, the thing the planet laughs at is one President Bush, and his apologists of course.

I vote for NOT banning Dahrma. Censorship is something Tipper Gore would do, for cryin out loud. Haven't we moved beyond that kind of crap?

"Censorship"? Hardly. He contributes nothing. He's intellectually bankrupt, dishonest, and nasty to boot. The only people to sing his praises are dyed-in-the-wool whack jobs. For example, only 3 regulars that I can think of: FT, Paul, and Shaman. The rest of us dislike him (at a minimum), and I, for one, full on hate his fucking guts.

It appears of late that anyone whom doesnt 'tow the party line' is hounded out of this place.

I get a feeling it may be Dharmas turn now, surprise surprise.

I hope the mods keep an eye on this, cant stand fucken bullying.

P.S. Is that really your mug I see as your avatar?
Are you kidding??? The pic in my avatar is of an obscure actor named Michael Douglas. Perhaps you've heard of him.

I hope the mods keep an eye on this, cant stand fucken bullying.
I do too, for it takes one of them to ban his useless ass.

Whatever happened to 'freedom of speech' in America ?

It appears of late that anyone whom doesnt 'tow the party line' is hounded out of this place.

I get a feeling it may be Dharmas turn now, surprise surprise.

I hope the mods keep an eye on this, cant stand fucken bullying.
Paul, dharma is just as much of a bully as any of them. He is one of only three posters who consistently rub me the wrong way (the other ones are Eggsalad and Waldo, and they are both conservatives so I hardly think you can blame this on him "not towing the party line"). He is very very rude, and although I agree with him on many issues, I disagree with the condescending and unnecessarily insulting way he puts them forward. You can blame this on the right wing conspiracy all you want, but when people like me (that is, NOT conservative and decidedly NOT Bush fans) call him a jerk, that theory wears a little thin. However, I would certainly not call for Dharma's banning. I don't think he steps over line of what should be acceptable. Those of us who frequent the politics section know that things get heated very often, and he doesn't really say anything excessively despicable or shocking. It just seems to me that dharma is a little too quick to hide behind the heated insults instead of at least attempting polite conversation.

It appears of late that anyone whom doesnt 'tow the party line' is hounded out of this place.
LOL - what percentage of the posters here have liberal leanings, Paul? Just to clue you in - those who "toe the party line" don't post here, bud. I, for one, fall out of favor with the Republican Party on several key issues, and I'm considered one of the MOST conservative posters on Allforums.

"Censorship"? Hardly. He contributes nothing. He's intellectually bankrupt, dishonest, and nasty to boot.

Ok, but I still call it censorship.

As far as the avatar pic goes, that doesn't really look much like Michael Douglas. Maybe after a month long's whiskey binge it may, but I did not recognize him at all.

Please accept my humblest of apologies.

:rolleyes:

I don't care much for dharmabum and I consider him an asshole but neither of those things should cause a person to be banned. I would keep dharmabum around because he is the personification of the rabid liberal. There are conservatives and rabid conservatives and there are liberals and rabid liberals. While we have no rabid conservatives we do have our own resident rabid liberal and I vote to keep him.

Well I think Foolie would qualify as a rabid conservative if he posted more about politics and less about nonsense. I definitely think that Waldo counts as a rabid conservative, maybe gmsisko as well.

I've said it before, and absolutely agree about dharma.. he can do no wrong, his ego will not allow it. Perhaps we should make a poll to see how many people want dharma banned.
:eek:

he doesn't need banning-burning at the stake maybe......:corn:

ANY city is nicer than detroit. Saying a city is nicer than Detroit is like saying a certain color is lighter than black.
at least it's not the mistake on the lake, aka Cleveland:slap:

I took mine once... it was a great opportunity to teach the kids all about deviant sexual practices. I especially loved the free porn on every corner. Only other place I've seen literature like that is in Vegas.
what's wrong with that?:confused:

"Censorship"? Hardly. He contributes nothing. He's intellectually bankrupt, dishonest, and nasty to boot. The only people to sing his praises are dyed-in-the-wool whack jobs.
Dharma ain't the only one like that on Allforums, I hate to say. You want him banned, we're going to have to do some spring cleaning with a couple other names.

But, on the other hand, banninating people is generally no good because even intellectually bankrupt, dishonest, and nasty people can be entertaining. We have quite the mix of interesting, intelligent people, and shallow idiots. If you're into British humor and have watched the series Blackadder, just imagine any of the idiots as Baldrick and you'll begin to get the picture.

(FWIW, I don't think that Dharma is unintelligent. He's merely an angry partisan hack. There's a difference.)

It appears of late that anyone whom doesnt 'tow the party line' is hounded out of this place.

I get a feeling it may be Dharmas turn now, surprise surprise.

I hope the mods keep an eye on this, cant stand fucken bullying.

Nah, the only people crying for me to be banned are a few fringe wackos that I have had on ignore for months anyway.

They don't matter. Let them scream into the void.

No worries.

Thank you for the support, by the way. :)

dharm has me on ignore, how convenient. Anybody who disagrees with him, he insults and puts on ignore. He's gotta be the most IGNORant person on these boards. I don't mind him posting here, but at least he should know how many people dislike him and for what reasons.

dharm has me on ignore, how convenient. Anybody who disagrees with him, he insults and puts on ignore. He's gotta be the most IGNORant person on these boards. I don't mind him posting here, but at least he should know how many people dislike him and for what reasons.
:lolhit:

Why should a poster know who likes and dislikes them, this is a debating shop, not a personality quiz.

you can't debate with someone if they have you on ignore LOL.. and for how much he posts...

I don't really see why anyone but the likes of Mr. Shaman should be on anyone's ignore list. Are people afraid to hear that they might not always be right?

we're going to have to do some spring cleaning with a couple other names.

Well I for one am against any type of 'spring cleaning',and am very much against banning Dhamra

By the way, Dharma? Shut the fuck up. Your assholishness is quite unwarranted. You can get your point across and/or ask questions without being a dick. Why don't you?

Oh man.... how in the hell did I miss this thread. I feel robbed..... i feel incomplete.

" only 3 regulars that I can think of: FT, Paul, and Shaman. . WOW.... they are even invoking Shaman over here.... You forgot about truth....I am sure where ever he is,he and his 5973 article archive from moveon.org are feeling rejected deep inside...

I have never put anyone on ignore, nor have I really come close to doing so.

at least it's not the mistake on the lake, aka Cleveland:slap:

Now wait a minute... I LIKE Cleveland! Spent a month there one week. In the middle of winter. Dealing with their so-called city council. They fight so much, they're not allowed to address each other. Must talk thru an arbitrator.

"Councilman Smith to Councilwoman Jones... get f*cked!"

Lake Shore Dr is beautiful. Of course, I skipped the tour of the ghetto. Might have left with a different opinion.

CLEVELAND ROCKS!

;)
SMW

Why should a poster know who likes and dislikes them, this is a debating shop, not a personality quiz.

Well said.
Some people come here to feel liked and others, like myself, come here for the debate and do not care whether I am liked or not, especially by the fringe elements.

I have never put anyone on ignore, nor have I really come close to doing so.

I did not want to but ultimately I had to because there are some people on here who just lack tact to such a degree that civil discourse became impossible with them and they became a complete waste of time. I still get heated with some people but it doesn't get as nasty as often as it used to.

The board is simply much more enjoyable for me with certain people on ignore.

I did not want to but ultimately I had to because there are some people on here who just lack tact to such a degree that civil discourse became impossible with them and they became a complete waste of time. I still get heated with some people but it doesn't get as nasty as often as it used to.

The board is simply much more enjoyable for me with certain people on ignore.

In other words, Dhrama is proud to be a coward. His mama raised him well. Wonder if he still wears those lace panties she insisted on when he was 6?

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t33/texrose752/board-auth.gif

In other words, Dhrama is proud to be a coward. His mama raised him well. Wonder if he still wears those lace panties she insisted on when he was 6?

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t33/texrose752/board-auth.gif


That's classic SMW.

I've only placed one person on ignore and that was Overdose when he had me so pissed I was afraid I would post things that I would later regret. Dharmabum is an annoying, overbearing little twit but he at least doesn't constantly whine that he is being picked on.

If we only posted with people with whom we agreed or who didn't annoy us this board would split up into three or four seperate boards.

Don't ban dharmabum but do let him know that you consider him to be a boorish ass.

I did not want to but ultimately I had to because there are some people on here who just lack tact to such a degree that civil discourse became impossible with them and they became a complete waste of time.
I'm sure that the irony here was lost on you. It is truly amazing to me that you complain of people who lack tact and are incapable of civil discourse when you are one of the most egregious offenders on the board. This thread is a good example. If you want people to be tactful and civil, why didn't you give Trav the benefit of the doubt instead of immediately calling him a liar?

I've only placed one person on ignore and that was Overdose when he had me so pissed I was afraid I would post things that I would later regret. Dharmabum is an annoying, overbearing little twit but he at least doesn't constantly whine that he is being picked on.

If we only posted with people with whom we agreed or who didn't annoy us this board would split up into three or four seperate boards.

Don't ban dharmabum but do let him know that you consider him to be a boorish ass.

Don't waste your breath, Frogger.. I'm pretty sure you're on his IGNORE list, too.

I certainly don't think the crybaby should be banned. He'd probably have to go into therapy. Never seen such a fragile ego on a grown man. Makes one wonder what he's trying so hard to prove?


*BOO*

(Good thing he's got me on ignore... he'd have peed his pants just then!!)

Why should a poster know who likes and dislikes them, this is a debating shop, not a personality quiz.
He doesn't "debate", Paul. THAT'S the point.

You know, you and I are polar opposites, politically speaking, and yet we can get along because you're an interesting person who treats people with respect. When I got nasty to you, I was flat-out wrong for doing so. I said disrespectful things out of anger, and I acted like a child (and yes - a bully, to an extent).

Having said that, my issue with you (at the time) was nothing like the issue I have with Dharma. Unless you agree with what he says, he's utterly useless here. Now that, my friend, is an immutable fact.

He is, by far and away, the WORST poster on Allforums. JMO.

Dharmabum is an annoying, overbearing little twit but he at least doesn't constantly whine that he is being picked on.
Are you kidding!?!? :eek: Talk to Vile about that one.

He doesn't "debate", Paul. THAT'S the point.

You know, you and I are polar opposites, politically speaking, and yet we can get along because you're an interesting person who treats people with respect. When I got nasty to you, I was flat-out wrong for doing so. I said disrespectful things out of anger, and I acted like a child (and yes - a bully, to an extent).

Having said that, my issue with you (at the time) was nothing like the issue I have with Dharma. Unless you agree with what he says, he's utterly useless here. Now that, my friend, is an immutable fact.

He is, by far and away, the WORST poster on Allforums. JMO.

I like and respect your honestly, and I had failings at that time also.

That said, a question:

Why not debate with Dharma and if your convinced your right, show him he is wrong, I mean, you guys do this sort of shit in school, debating is your thing.

If ya dont like him, so what. You dont have to show it to prove your point.

Paul,

The problem is, dharma doesn't debate. He gets personal and insulting. If you disagree with dharma he calls you a liar or worse. He doesn't want to debate. He wants to argue.

I'm sure that the irony here was lost on you. It is truly amazing to me that you complain of people who lack tact and are incapable of civil discourse when you are one of the most egregious offenders on the board. This thread is a good example. If you want people to be tactful and civil, why didn't you give Trav the benefit of the doubt instead of immediately calling him a liar?

Obviously the irony of this post is lost on you.

There are many people with whom I have very pleasant conversations all the time, especially now that I have the worst offenders on ignore. I am usually only rude to people who are rude to me first, like you in this thread for instance. In fact, you have gotten pretty damn bad towards me lately. You need to chill out.

I usually do give Trav the benefit of the doubt unless he says something patently, obviously wrong, as he did in this thread about the "liberal cities like San Francisco". I used to live there, so I know better to believe that crap he was spewing. You have not lived there, but even you questioned him on it too because it was so obviously B.S.

Also, I did not "call him a liar". I did not have to, because it was so obvious he was lying. I asked him politely whether he was lying and he said yes.

You are a smart kid borg, but you have some more maturing to do before I can take you seriously about stuff like this.

Heh, as soon as I saw the title of this thread I knew it was going to devolve quickly. After keeping away for the better part of the week, and just checking now, I was right! The curious thing about it is, devolved threads tend to gather more responses from more people than the civilized threads. I wonder why this is?

Why not debate with Dharma and if your convinced your right, show him he is wrong, I mean, you guys do this sort of shit in school, debating is your thing.
All I can say, Paul, is try playing devil's advocate with him. It's one thing to disagree; it's entirely another to be nasty for no reason, and obstinate to fault. He's worthless, IMO, and I'd be willing to bet dollars to doughnuts that I'm not alone in my assessment.

I like and respect your honestly, and I had failings at that time also.

That said, a question:

Why not debate with Dharma and if your convinced your right, show him he is wrong, I mean, you guys do this sort of shit in school, debating is your thing.

If ya dont like him, so what. You dont have to show it to prove your point.

That would be a waste of time since I have Prat on ignore and won't bother responding to him. I gave him the benefit of the doubt and numerous chances, but he is one of the worst offenders on the board and one of the quickest to take a small disagreement and turn it into an opprotunity for personal attacks instead of trying to have civil discourse. Since the moderators have repeatedly told me to "mind my own business" when I complained about his behavior I have no choice but to ignore him.

Also, I did not "call him a liar". I did not have to, because it was so obvious he was lying. I asked him politely whether he was lying and he said yes.

.

You called Trav and I both liars on the Obama Speech thread, dharma--merely because we had a different take on said speech than your own.

You have also accused me of not watching certain movies because my opinion of said movie was, again, different than yours.

What is your problem?

Where is it written that I have to believe everything everyone says?

Get real.

I find this ironic since one of the most common responses to most of my posts is that they don't believe me.

What is your problem?
He's an asshole of gigantic proportions, Ren. In a nutshell, that's his problem....

As bad as the original topic of evil liberals destroying America was, it was better than this. I never thought I'd find myself in this position, but can we please talk about evil liberals again? Leaving present company out of the discussion?

Yet some people claim I am rude. :rolleyes:

Not to mention people who are chronic liars themselves find it very difficult to believe everyone else isn't lying. I did get a chuckle out of his accusing Ren of not seeing a movie they were discussing. AS IF she'd come here and lie about something like that!

Yep, he's a treasure. Unfortunately, not a buried treasure.

;)
SMW

I'd call Waldo the worst poster here. He is far more horribly insulting than dharma. Eggsalad would win but he hasn't posted enough to count in this reckoning yet.

There are many people with whom I have very pleasant conversations all the time, especially now that I have the worst offenders on ignore. I am usually only rude to people who are rude to me first, like you in this thread for instance. In fact, you have gotten pretty damn bad towards me lately. You need to chill out.

I usually do give Trav the benefit of the doubt unless he says something patently, obviously wrong, as he did in this thread about the "liberal cities like San Francisco". I used to live there, so I know better to believe that crap he was spewing. You have not lived there, but even you questioned him on it too because it was so obviously B.S.
Of course it's BS. That doesn't automatically make Trav a liar. I'd be willing to bet that he had heard this on the radio or the Internet or something, and assumed it was true. That's why I asked him to back up his assertion rather than freaking out and calling him a liar. You can be right and still be polite, you know. Which is why I got pissed at you. Being objectively right does not give you free license to accuse people of being deliberately untruthful.
Also, I did not "call him a liar". I did not have to, because it was so obvious he was lying. I asked him politely whether he was lying and he said yes.
You must be from the planet Ford Prefect is from, if you're that incapable of detecting sarcasm. Either that, or you were being deliberately obtuse.

. You can be right and still be polite, you know. Which is why I got pissed at you. Being objectively right does not give you free license to accuse people of being deliberately untruthful.

Spoken by a true asshole. You think you were right when I posted on that Cell Phone board and you did worse than call me a liar. You were SO FUKKING RUDE TO ME, I didn't come back for damned near a week cuz I couldn't stand to be in yer presence, even from a distance.

I have never been so deeply insulted on ANY message board and believe me, I've heard it all... until you chimed in like the true jackass you are.

And here you backstabingly say "You can be right and still be poilte, you know."

WHAT A JOKE YOU ARE AND NOT A VERY FUNNY ONE AT THAT.

You Total Fukking Idiot.

Wow. That was random.

Wow. That was random.

And that was funny.

LOLOLOL!!!!

My sons school called me today to tell me he was in the nurses office because of eye irritation due to allergys. I asked them is they could give him some allergy medicine, they said not without a doctors note and a parents note. I had to drive the 30 miles to give him a teaspoon and a half of over the counter medicine, then drive back to work. That is all fine and good, and that is not what I am complaining about, the thing is, if he were a teenage girl she could go have an abortion easier then it was for my son to get a dose of Benadryl. I am just saying, this is all because of liberals and their stupid ideas.

So the school should take care of your child, communist, left wing agenda here and I dont think the school nurse does abortions either.
Your a poor excuse for a conservative, but you could have (probably would) sued if your kid had been given the juice and something had gone wrong.Take care of your own kid and quite trying to blame "Liberals" for everything.

Spoken by a true asshole. You think you were right when I posted on that Cell Phone board and you did worse than call me a liar. You were SO FUKKING RUDE TO ME, I didn't come back for damned near a week cuz I couldn't stand to be in yer presence, even from a distance.

I have never been so deeply insulted on ANY message board and believe me, I've heard it all... until you chimed in like the true jackass you are.

And here you backstabingly say "You can be right and still be poilte, you know."

WHAT A JOKE YOU ARE AND NOT A VERY FUNNY ONE AT THAT.

You Total Fukking Idiot.
:eek: What, exactly, did he say that was so "fukking" rude? Whatever it was, I can't imagine that it topped your post here.

"Censorship"? Hardly. He contributes nothing. He's intellectually bankrupt, dishonest, and nasty to boot. The only people to sing his praises are dyed-in-the-wool whack jobs. For example, only 3 regulars that I can think of: FT, Paul, and Shaman. The rest of us dislike him (at a minimum), and I, for one, full on hate his fucking guts.

Your, as usual, such an asshole!

Whatever happened to 'freedom of speech' in America ?

Only Liberals believe in that!

Your, as usual, such an asshole!

:corn:

Nah, the only people crying for me to be banned are a few fringe wackos that I have had on ignore for months anyway.

They don't matter. Let them scream into the void.

No worries.

Thank you for the support, by the way. :)

I think you should leave, why waste your time here with these idiots?

:eek: What, exactly, did he say that was so "fukking" rude? Whatever it was, I can't imagine that it topped your post here.

It may not have "topped" my "post here", but that's how mad it made me. I usually fight with fire but in this case, I unleashed my arsenal on him.

The urge was overwhelming so I tended to it, ya know.

I think you should leave, why waste your time here with these idiots?

Not everybody here is an idiot.

Your, as usual, such an asshole!
You know, my retarded cousin used to structure his sentences just like you did here, but then, amazingly enough, we found him some help. Through careful training and patience, he learned by his twelfth birthday to differentiate the possessive form of the word, "your", from the contraction, and the kicker is - he's SEVERELY impaired.

My point? Don't be embarrassed by your deficiencies; if you need access to information that can help you, then shoot me a PM, and I'll send you some instructional material for the mentally challenged. It's a fun package that consists of coloring books, puzzles, and whatnot - so I think you'll find it plenty entertaining AND mentally stimulating.

I mean, if there's hope for my severely (and by that, I do mean severely) retarded cousin, then there's gotta be hope for you too, right?

Stay positive, champ! Help is only a few keystrokes away. :)

Top psychiatrist concludes liberals clinically nuts (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56494)

Eminent psychiatrist makes case ideology is mental disorder

WASHINGTON – Just when liberals thought it was safe to start identifying themselves as such, an acclaimed, veteran psychiatrist is making the case that the ideology motivating them is actually a mental disorder.

"Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded," says Dr. Lyle Rossiter, author of the new book, "The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness." "Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave."

While political activists on the other side of the spectrum have made similar observations, Rossiter boasts professional credentials and a life virtually free of activism and links to "the vast right-wing conspiracy."

For more than 35 years he has diagnosed and treated more than 1,500 patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist and examined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases as a board-certified forensic psychiatrist. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the University of Chicago.

Rossiter says the kind of liberalism being displayed by the two major candidates for the Democratic Party presidential nomination can only be understood as a psychological disorder.

"A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity – as liberals do," he says. "A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population – as liberals do. And a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which over-regulates and over-taxes the nation's citizens, corrupts their character and reduces them to wards of the state – as liberals do."

Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:

- creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;
- satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;
- augmenting primitive feelings of envy;
- rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.

"The roots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind," he says. "When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious."

LOL I don't know which is funnier, the actual article or the fact that SMW is actually taking it seriously! Either way, props for trying to get this back on track!

LOL I don't know which is funnier, the actual article or the fact that SMW is actually taking it seriously! Either way, props for trying to get this back on track!

You can buy the book (http://shop.wnd.com/store/item.asp?DEPARTMENT_ID=6&SUBDEPARTMENT_ID=20&ITEM_ID=2285) for only $19.95, Nappy! (Or the author is in private practice in Chicago... maybe Borg could just stop by and pick up a copy for us?)

Yeah, enough pie-throwing. Back to the gnashing of teeth and bloodshed.

:banana:

You don't need a book to know that liberals have a mental disorder. Just talk to them for awhile.

Where is it written that I have to believe everything everyone says?

Get real.

I find this ironic since one of the most common responses to most of my posts is that they don't believe me.

Considering you ridicule anyone who doesn't believe YOU... it's funny to see that you are actually saying this.

dharma,

No one expects you to believe everything others post but we do expect you to be less nasty about expressing your disbelief.

One day an Irishman who has been stranded on a desert island for ten years, see's an unusual speck on the horizon.
''Its certainly not a ship'' he thinks to himself.As the speck gets closer,he begins to rule out the possibility of a small boat or even a raft.

Suddenly emerging from the surf comes a gorgeous blond wearing a wet suit and scuba gear.

She approaches the stunned man and says to him ''Tell me, how long has it been since you had a cigarette?'' ''Ten years'' replies the Irishman. With that she reaches over and unzips a waterproof pocket and pulls out a fresh pack of cigarettes. He takes one,lights it,takes a long drag and says ''Jesus,that is good''.

''And how long has it been since you had a sip of whiskey?'' she asks him.
Trembleing,the castaway replies, ''Ten years''. She reaches over, unzips her right sleeve,pulls out a flask of Bushmills and hands it to him. He takes a swig from the flask and says ''Tis absolutly fantastic''.

At this point she slowly unzips the long zipper that runs down the front of her wet suit,looks at the man and asks ''And how long has it been since you played around?''

With tears in his eyes,the man falls to his knees and sobs ''Oh sweet Jesus, dont tell me you have golf clubs in there also''.

Nice one, paul. :)

Nice one, paul. :)

Yer not gonna like,Shower him wits some lillies,are ya.?
Oscar Wilde wood...Y'nose.
Plus duh facts,Wilde,living in Paris at the Hotel d'Alsace,after
his Prison term, gladfully returned to his former promiscuity.
On his deathbed,Wilde was received into the Roman Catholic
Church,and administered Baptism and Extreme Unction.
However,Oscar could not take the eucharist.
His tomb,later fashioned by sculptor Sir Jacob Epstein where
a Modernist Angel is depicted,with male genitals,that had been broken
off,and kept as paperweights by a succession of Pere Lachaise Cemetery
keepers.The numerous spots on the tombstone are lipstick traces from
admirers.
Just thought ya oughta knowed.

Interesting Foolie.
Have ya got a pic of the tomb ?

Interesting Foolie.
Have ya got a pic of the tomb ?

Got even better.
Got a purdy good mental image of sums these hear Mods.
I do.

You know, my retarded cousin used to structure his sentences just like you did here, but then, amazingly enough, we found him some help. Through careful training and patience, he learned by his twelfth birthday to differentiate the possessive form of the word, "your", from the contraction, and the kicker is - he's SEVERELY impaired.

My point? Don't be embarrassed by your deficiencies; if you need access to information that can help you, then shoot me a PM, and I'll send you some instructional material for the mentally challenged. It's a fun package that consists of coloring books, puzzles, and whatnot - so I think you'll find it plenty entertaining AND mentally stimulating.

I mean, if there's hope for my severely (and by that, I do mean severely) retarded cousin, then there's gotta be hope for you too, right?

Stay positive, champ! Help is only a few keystrokes away. :)
Yew can always tell who reeds literature regularly and who doesn't, buy the people who regularly fuck up there homophones. Sure, every once inn a wile, each and every won of us will git a wire crossed in are brains and type "your" instead of "you're". 95% of the time I correct it within too seconds. 4.5% of the time it'll slip into my post and I'll catch it on the re-reed. The remainder, it'll sneak in their and hang out four a wile. Butt it's definitely a good indicator of how much a person reeds, because homophones our something that won only gets incite into threw the written word.

He said homophones.

Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:

- creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;
- satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;
- augmenting primitive feelings of envy;
- rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.
Oh good maybe there's hope for me yet. Hopefully they'll come up with a pill I can take to get as healthy as SMW. Besides the OxyContin and hydrocodone which worked for Rush but aren't working for me just yet...

Yew can always tell who reeds literature regularly and who doesn't, buy the people who regularly fuck up there homophones. Sure, every once inn a wile, each and every won of us will git a wire crossed in are brains and type "your" instead of "you're". 95% of the time I correct it within too seconds. 4.5% of the time it'll slip into my post and I'll catch it on the re-reed. The remainder, it'll sneak in their and hang out four a wile. Butt it's definitely a good indicator of how much a person reeds, because homophones our something that won only gets incite into threw the written word.
LOL - that was pretty clever, Borg. :)

Hopefully they'll come up with a pill I can take to get as healthy as SMW.

I think the closest thing to that would be lysergic acid diethylamide.

:thumbs:

or a nice bottle of STFU