PDA

View Full Version : Made for TV Recession


gmsisko1
02-14-2008, 08:59 PM
Made-for-TV Recession: Economic Pity Party Continues
February 11, 2008

By Herman Cain

Now that Mitt Romney has gracefully ended Act One of the drama in the Republican presidential primary by suspending his campaign, and since the only real drama in the Democratic presidential race is whether it will be the first female nominee or the first African-American nominee, some of the media elites have already returned to their next favorite theme of "A Recession is Coming."

My January 21, 2008 column describing this media frenzy as a rerun of the movie, "The Economy", was short-sighted, because the mainstream media editors and writers are putting out enough material for a long-running TV series. Some of the latest episodes:

"Economic outlook turns bleaker. U.S. Employers cut jobs for first time in 4 years. (Jeannine Aversa, AP 2-02-08). "Conditions are deteriorating, according to the latest employment snapshot by the Labor Department, which showed nervous employers slicing payrolls by 17,000. The country hadn't seen such a nationwide job loss since 2003."

It is not revealed in the article until the very end that state and local government accounted for a loss of 18,000 jobs, while the private sector actually added 1,000 jobs. Lesson learned, keep reading. Additionally, the job numbers will be revised as more data are collected, and for the last four years they have always been revised favorably. But there is no drama in favorable revisions to employment reports.

"Recession fears grip market. Alarming data from service sector send Dow industrials down 370 points", (Madlen Read, AP 2-06-08).

That alarming 370 points was 13 percent lower than the all-time high last October of 14,164 points, but still nearly 5 percent higher than the 52-week low of 11,634. Observation: It's called normal volatility.

"Consumer Confidence Sinks Even Lower amid heightened fears about shrinking job opportunities and the possibility the country is falling into a recession." (Jeannine Aversa, AP 2-08-08).

Surprise, surprise, surprise! This continuing recession theme is having its desired effect of putting Paul and Pamela Pitiful into an economic bad mood.

Thankfully, I found one article that presented the facts minus the hyperbole. Economist Brian Wesbury concluded:

"The Economy is Fine (Really). Rampant pessimism with so little evidence of serious trouble." (Wall Street Journal, 1-28-08.)

Brian Wesbury is chief economist at First Trust Advisors, a Chicago-based investment bank. He is not a media reporter, and his conclusion does not fit the story line for "A Recession is Coming". Thus, you will not find his articles on the front pages of the business sections of most newspapers.

It is worth repeating. We are in an economic correction of our national economy, not a recession. Negative economic hyperbole causes employers and investors to become hesitant, which could unnecessarily stimulate a further slowdown in the economy.

Some local economies are experiencing negative growth or none at all, but that cannot be blamed on short-term consequences of national economic policies. Similarly, some people are experiencing personal recessions with their finances, but the state of the national economy is the least of the mitigating reasons.

I will uncharacteristically make a prediction: Liberal members of the mainstream media and the Democratic presidential candidates will continue to fan the flames of economic doom and gloom all the way to the November elections. Why? Because it's the next best surrogate for Bush bashing, since undeniable progress in Iraq does not offer much media drama.

If Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama win the White House, then the new storyline will be how long (four years of course) it will take them to clean up the economic mess created by President Bush.

If John McCain wins, the series will continue until they talk the public into a recession. The economic pity party . . . to be continued

www.hermancain.com

dharmabum
02-14-2008, 11:22 PM
If the economy is so "fine" then why are Bush and the Republicans suddenly insisting we need an "Emergency stimulus package"?

Political pandering?

Freethinker
02-14-2008, 11:46 PM
Made-for-TV Recession: Economic Pity Party Continues
February 11, 2008

By Herman Cain

Fine.

All we have to do now is wait and SEE if there is indeed an economic recession on the horizon for this country......OR, as Herman Cain seems to imply, it is simply that some e-ville 'liberal' element in the Media is making the whole thing up, statistics and all.

If the recession never arrives, then this fucking crackpot Herman Cain -- a truly CEASELESS cheerleader for ALL things Rightwing-- will have proven to be, at least for once in his life, correct.

I mean, surely the fucking world renowned economic wunderkind Herman Cain knows more that a few hundred actual economists who have warned of the coming recession...........right?

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

ROTFL.

The Praetorian
02-15-2008, 01:57 PM
I mean, surely the fucking world renowned economic wunderkind Herman Cain knows more that a few hundred actual economists who have warned of the coming recession...........right?

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

ROTFL.
I love the way you word things sometimes. :)

fluffernutter
02-15-2008, 02:05 PM
Yesterday that liberal suck-up Alan Greenspan hysterically warned that we are "clearly on the edge" of recession, as reported in that socialist mouthpiece Bloomberg (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aI_HoK4yXcYc&refer=home). Such elitist histrionics only serve to further the interests of the Democrats and, of course, Al Qaeda.

Freethinker
02-15-2008, 08:39 PM
Yesterday that liberal suck-up Alan Greenspan hysterically warned that we are "clearly on the edge" of recession, as reported in that socialist mouthpiece Bloomberg. Such elitist histrionics only serve to further the interests of the Democrats and, of course, Al Qaeda.

Exactly.

Why!, it makes ya wonder if Greenspan and that Bloomberg rag, subversive leftist elements that they are, are both in league with the Communists.

They're no doubt making it all up about a possible coming recession so as to weaken our fair Republic. Gee whiz.....I guess it's time for Herman Cain to hold a press conference and tell the world how wrong they are.

:rolleyes:

Brooks
02-16-2008, 11:42 AM
If the economy is so "fine" then why are Bush and the Republicans suddenly insisting we need an "Emergency stimulus package"?
Political pandering?
And about that stimulus package:

Apparently the president and Nancy Pelosi are in agreement that when people have more of their own money its good for the economy. Funny.
and
How is it that a "rebate" can be given to someone who didn't pay taxes in the first place. Just a thought.

dharmabum
02-16-2008, 03:02 PM
Apparently the president and Nancy Pelosi are in agreement that when people have more of their own money its good for the economy. Funny.


You don't think that people having more money is good for the economy?

mikezila
02-16-2008, 11:17 PM
You don't think that people having more money is good for the economy?
it would have been even better if they hadn't been over-taxed to support a nanny state to begin with.:banana:

dharmabum
02-17-2008, 02:09 AM
it would have been even better if they hadn't been over-taxed to support a nanny state to begin with.

"Over-taxed" is a subjective opinion and does not address the question I asked.

ConservativeMan
02-17-2008, 08:17 AM
hey guys, I am back.

I agree, that all people pay taxes, but there are some who pay more. As such, is it more advantageous for people who have the money (who quite frankly could care less about getting 600 bucks from the government) or the people who will actually use the money. I don't think it is a "deserve the money" patch as much as it is "go out and use it" patch.

I think the better solution is to cut spending so that the people have more and the government is smaller.

It is good to be back, later guys.
CM

es347fan
02-17-2008, 09:13 AM
File taxes (http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/02/17/more_illegal_immigrants_are_rushing_to_file_taxes/) - with a secondary gain of a quick rebate check & a free ride back home?

Freethinker
02-17-2008, 07:59 PM
hey guys, I am back.


Oh goody.

Be still my fucking heart.

_______________________________

I don't believe for a second that any *Conservative Man* who still backs Gee Dubya, at this late date, they can be "gotten" to. Thus, I have no interest in wooing any any person of the reprehensible died-in-the-sheep's-clothing "red vote". I have no interest in debating them or swapping scripture with them or thumb wresting them for forensic points because it simply doesn't work. They are the tribe of "Always In Error But Never In Doubt"; a clan of simpleminded Declarative Dumbfucks, that have been proven bloodily, monstrously, horribly, incontrovertibly, overwhelmingly and tragically wrong year after year after year after year, and it hasn't made so much as a dent in their certitude, or nary a new cortical fold or crease to form on the smooth, inert surfaces of their Beautiful Minds.

They are lost and doomed; they have filled their skulls with bumper stickers and fear, welded it shut, and melted the keys down for tinfoil to line their beanies.

The Praetorian
02-18-2008, 01:07 PM
Oh goody.

Be still my fucking heart.
LOL! You're such a fucking cock.

DarkFantasy96
02-18-2008, 09:43 PM
I don't know what it is with me and the word cock, but I think it's awesome.

The Praetorian
02-19-2008, 07:26 AM
Are you sure it's just the word you think is awesome? :D

DarkFantasy96
02-19-2008, 03:21 PM
Are you sure it's just the word you think is awesome? :D
:lolhit: Hmm, good question.

Brooks
02-19-2008, 04:19 PM
You don't think that people having more money is good for the economy?Yes, therefore we should be able to keep more of it. Pelosi agrees.

fluffernutter
02-20-2008, 02:11 PM
After 8 years of tax cuts (directed mainly at the top 1%) and deficit spending to the tune of 3 TRILLION dollars, why should a "stimulus package" be necessary in the first place? And ironically, to get the economy that shot in the arm - we target the middle and lower classes - the people who have been ignored for the last 8 years. Not much of a validation of the Trickle Down theory.

dharmabum
02-22-2008, 12:42 AM
Yes, therefore we should be able to keep more of it.

The important point is that we agree that people making more money is good for the economy.

Pelosi agrees.

Congratulations on your new job as Pelosi's spokesperson. :rolleyes:

dharmabum
02-22-2008, 12:44 AM
After 8 years of tax cuts (directed mainly at the top 1%) and deficit spending to the tune of 3 TRILLION dollars, why should a "stimulus package" be necessary in the first place? And ironically, to get the economy that shot in the arm - we target the middle and lower classes - the people who have been ignored for the last 8 years. Not much of a validation of the Trickle Down theory.

It is a comlete discrediting of Voodoo economics.

Brooks
02-22-2008, 07:38 AM
The important point is that we agree that people making more money is good for the economy.

And since it's not possible to legislate salary increases, what options remain for the government to increase the effective income of working people?

dharmabum
02-22-2008, 08:47 AM
And since it's not possible to legislate salary increases, what options remain for the government to increase the effective income of working people?

Supporting unions again would be a great place to start.
Enforcing the Sherman anti-trust act and repealing taft-hartley would be fantastic too.

Basically supporting Americans again.

Brooks
02-22-2008, 09:25 AM
How does that increase one's spendable income?

dharmabum
02-22-2008, 11:01 PM
How does that increase one's spendable income?

Unions cause increased wages through collective bargaining in wage negotiations.

Again, I am glad we agree that putting more money in the hands of the average person is good for the economy.