So….Who Will Be The Next President, Clinton Or Obama? (http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/sowho_will_be_the_next_president_clinton_or_obama/)

It certainly won’t be John (the Manchurian Candidate) McCain.
McCain is by far the front runner for the Republicans right now, with Romney gone and Huckabee - who was, in my opinion, just hanging in the race to siphon votes from Romney because he and McCain have already made the backroom deal for him to run in the VP slot - is way, way back.

An interesting note - Democratic voters outnumbered Republican voters nearly 2 to 1 on Super Tuesday. That alone could foreshadow a very bad result for Republicans come November.

Right now Clinton and Obama are nearly tied. This is the point where the bloodletting usually really begins in an election but if you’ll notice the shots exchanged by the two of them have subsided from a few weeks ago. I suspect that there have been more backroom deals between the two of them. One - either - will be President and the other will go for the VP slot.

If Clinton gets the nomination the GOP will probably start trying to sling dirt on her and there is plenty of dirt to be found. The problem with that is this - that would work on most any other candidate. The press, however, won’t be all over it like the starving jackals they usually are, especially if the candidate they have dirt on is a Republican.

Most likely they would present stuff like that in their condescending way and make whoever brought it up look like shallow, vicious fools. As far as I can see, the Republicans blew this one in fine style.

You can bet that the Dems are pleased that McCain will be the candidate. They’ll beat him like a rented mule come election time. As of this point it’s just a matter of seeing which one of the two will be taking the lead dog role.
We should probably get used to the idea.

What a great idea for a thread -- I wonder why no one else thought of it!!

If you didnt want to comment all you had to do was shut your fucking mouth... If you felt this thread needed to be combined with one that is similar than by all means inform the moderators and have them combine it with the original thread you have in mind.

Either way the last thing I or probably anyone else wants to see is your terrible attempt at sarcasm,and the horrible attempt your going to make at the ensuing pissing contest that will form due to your asinine comments.

If you didnt want to comment all you had to do was shut your fucking mouth... If you felt this thread needed to be combined with one that is similar than by all means inform the moderators and have them combine it with the original thread you have in mind.

Either way the last thing I or probably anyone else wants to see is your terrible attempt at sarcasm,and the horrible attempt your going to make at the ensuing pissing contest that will form due to your asinine comments.ROFL!!

You're way too easy. :)

That was pretty good, sedan! :D

Clint-O-Bama ?
Er better still :

O'clint Yo Mama.

Clint-O-Bama ?
Er better still :

O'clint Yo Mama.


~groan~

I've already given my reason I won't vote for Hilary....if I have to I will change sides and vote Obama

That was pretty good, sedan! :D

yeah...yeah...yeah... bedroom Boy.
Everythings Kool wits you.
You just finished off the last of Aunt betsy's nice
Apple fritters.

The only reason "conservatives" like Ann Coulter, Rush, and Sean Hannity are pissed off is because the Republican Party is actually thinking for itself, and not listening to these talking-heads anymore.

Do you know why real conservatives and Republicans aren't listening to these talking-heads anymore? Because they gave us Bush. And what did Bush do? He ruined the Republican parties reputation and name more than any other Republican President.

At least the majority of the Republican party has realized this -- it is sad LiquidFork has gotten there yet.

yeah...yeah...yeah... bedroom Boy.
Everythings Kool wits you.
You just finished off the last of Aunt betsy's nice
Apple fritters.
I sure would like to meet your Aunt Betsy, she seems to be a... colorful sort.

ROFL!!

You're way too easy. :)

I admit you did irk me a bit,but I think you and nappy always read me wrong.... In the beginning he used to complain about my signatures and i admit he did get under my skin a bit... but i have since learned to be calm and do something about my inner peace and stuff..

Honestly Sedan I did mean my comment to be a little swarmy and egotistical. (that is kinda your M.O..... I am trying to debate with you guys in here in your own style).. but you really didnt piss me off... If you fucked with my grammar or spelling...... I would of went through the roof.

.
.
.
the nest president i s Hillary Clinton.Obama is the vicepr esident
.
.

The only reason "conservatives" like Ann Coulter, Rush, and Sean Hannity are pissed off is because the Republican Party is actually thinking for itself, and not listening to these talking-heads anymore.

Do you know why real conservatives and Republicans aren't listening to these talking-heads anymore? Because they gave us Bush. And what did Bush do? He ruined the Republican parties reputation and name more than any other Republican President.

At least the majority of the Republican party has realized this -- it is sad LiquidFork has gotten there yet.
LOL. Not quite OD. What has happened is that the GOP has gotten caught up in the "big government / neo-con" crazies. It happened in the 70's and it took a Carter presidency to snap them out of it. When the Republicans start getting "cocky and spend-happy", and the Democrats start going right... it's time for a Democrat. Both of the Bush's have led down the same trail. It's like moon phases (but much more annoying). The majority of the GOP party (the voters, not the politicians) are holding their noses and wallets... not "thinking for themselves" as you put it.

If you fucked with my grammar or spelling...... I would of went through the roof.You mean "would have". :)

I admit, you did irk me a bit,but I think you and Nappy always read me wrong. In the beginning he used to complain about my signatures and I admit, he did get under my skin a bit, but I have since learned to be calm and do something about my inner peace and stuff.

Honestly, Sedan, I did mean my comment to be a little smarmy and egotistical, (that is kinda your M.O., I am trying to debate with you guys in here in your own style) but you really didn't piss me off. If you had fucked with my grammar or spelling, I would have gone through the roof.
FTFY.

McCain is by far the front runner for the Republicans right now, with Romney gone and Huckabee - who was, in my opinion, just hanging in the race to siphon votes from Romney because he and McCain have already made the backroom deal for him to run in the VP slot - is way, way back.

Interesting point about Huckabee. I think that Romney WILL be on the ticket somewhere.

An interesting note - Democratic voters outnumbered Republican voters nearly 2 to 1 on Super Tuesday. That alone could foreshadow a very bad result for Republicans come November.

Ehh. Probably such a huge turnout because the most e-ville human in the universe, Hillary Clinton, was on the ballot.......it seems that even Democratic voters are not immune to the drumbeat of **Hate Hillary, Hate Hillary** that the Rightwing Media outlets have been drilling into the sheep's consciousness for 15 years. It may be that much of the Dem turnout was simply to vote for Obama so she could not get the nod.

If Clinton gets the nomination the GOP will probably start trying to sling dirt on her and there is plenty of dirt to be found.

Dirt?

I don't want her for president (far too conservative for me), but this ""plenty of dirt to be found"" is a new one on me.

I'd be curious to know what all this 'dirt' is, in your view LQ.

The problem with that is this - that would work on most any other candidate. The press, however, won’t be all over it like the starving jackals they usually are, especially if the candidate they have dirt on is a Republican.

Wow. You truly are living in Bizarro World. You have it exactly backwards.

A prime example; just look at the incident of Whitewater (which Clinton was involved in) and Harken Energy (which B*sh was involved in).

Do you honestly want to compare the Media coverage of those two events?!?!?

Half the people on this board have probably never even HEARD OF Harken Energy.

Clinton lost about $60,000 on the Whitewater deal, and millions of dollars were spent investigating it. Not to mention millions of pages of newspaper coverage being printed about it. Not to mention hearing it on the network news practically every night for a year.

B*sh, OTOH, using insider trading knowledge, profited about $850,000 on his sale of Harken stock. Shortly thereafter, Harken stock plummeted from $4 to $1.25. Yet you barely heard the Corporate Media in this country let out a peep.

B*sh did something about 20 times as sleazy and as crooked with the Harken deal as what happened with Whitewater, yet the coverage of the two is like daylight and dark.

You can bet that the Dems are pleased that McCain will be the candidate. They’ll beat him like a rented mule come election time.

I disagree. With the mainstream Media solidly --and I DO mean solidly-- in his corner, (which it will be, naturally) John McCain has an excellent chance if it is **the e-ville Hillary** that he's facing.

You mean "would have". :)

Prove that {" would have "} is MORE Grammatically correct than
[ " would of " ].?

You mean "would have". :)

LOL... you never disappoint me Sedan!!


Why dont you ever go after Fools spelling/grammar? Iam not even sure half of what he types are actual words. Should be Christmas in july for you there.

Kindly explain in 100 words or less why ULTRA-Liberal is
good for this Country.?
I mean ...Our Country.
And don't use any Hokey cliches like ... - What's Good for the
Goose is Good for the Canadian - er some such stuffero.

Damn, Liquid's getting frisky tonight. Sexy.

(Nappy, you're frisky too... as usual. :p)

And Foolie - "What's Good for the Goose is Good for the Canadian"? WTF? :lolhit:

Damn, Liquid's getting frisky tonight. Sexy.

(Nappy, you're frisky too... as usual. :p)

And Foolie - "What's Good for the Goose is Good for the Canadian"? WTF? :lolhit:
Canadian Geeses, you've never heard of them, eh?

Canadian Geeses, you've never heard of them, eh?

Geese IS Plural.
No need for " Geese's ".
Even If Canada has them on every street corner,panhandling.
Like gettin Goosed.

Panhandling geese, eh? Hmmm.

Geese IS Plural.
No need for " Geese's ".
Even If Canada has them on every street corner,panhandling.
Like gettin Goosed.
:eek: you are correcting someone else's English?!:lolhit:


the end is neigh!

:eek: you are correcting someone else's English?!:lolhit:


the end is neigh!
http://www.quickstopentertainment.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/MrEd%5B1%5D.jpg

Dirt?

I don't want her for president (far too conservative for me), but this ""plenty of dirt to be found"" is a new one on me.

I'd be curious to know what all this 'dirt' is, in your view LQ.

I am guessing this was an invitation to show there will be plenty of dirt for a conservative media outlet to dig for,if Hillary manages to get asked to the big dance.

I find it hard to believe that you have not came across any mention of a Hillary scandal..... here are a few things I came across with a simple search engine request...

NOW remember... you only asked me to provide "dirt"... it doesn't have to be 100% true,nor does it have to be fair.... Remember........all "dirt" does in the political arena is put a persons name on the headlines in a unfavorable light..... It doesn't have to connect all the dots so to speak...

It is up the the press,and the American people to decide if it is important enough to dig a Lil deeper to see what it is all about.

Remember when Rather thought he had all the answers? He did manage to toss the dirt around,but in that case the American people and the media wanted to know the whole story and it backfired.. Some of these story's might do the same thing...Some might pan out... in all reality all they need to do is raise a few eyebrows and make a small percentage of people have a single negative thought about Hillary for president... and it is mission accomplished.

Bill Clinton, A Big Clinton Financial Backer And A Mining Deal (http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/bill_clinton_a_big_clinton_financial_backer_and_a_ mining_deal/)

http://www.hillaryclintonrevealed.net/hillary_clinton_dubai.htm

http://www.hillaryclintonrevealed.net/hillary_clinton_travelgate.htm

http://www.hillaryclintonrevealed.net/hillary_clinton_alleged_criminal.htm

http://www.webloggin.com/another-hillary-clinton-scandal-pardons-for-votes-claimed-by-judicial-watch/

http://washingtontimes.com/article/20080208/NATION/942016032/0/NATION02

http://blogsagainsthillary.com/tags/clinton-pardon-scandal

http://blogsagainsthillary.com/hsu-he-completely-legit

http://blogsagainsthillary.com/clinton-fundraiser-raising-eyebrows

http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2007/11/22/another-day-another-hillary-clinton-campaign-scandal/

http://www.fortliberty.org/blog/hillary-clintons-cell-phone-scandal.html


On a side note I have read your opinion that the country has been listening to the "hillary is evil" drumbeat for a long long time in an attempt to brainwash us into thinking hillary is evil.... If that is true,and you know it... she must certainly know it... why does she to date have so many questionable things surrounding her name? A biased media outlet can paint a very ugly picture I agree...but they need to buy the paint somewhere...

Apparently the definition liquid is using for "dirt" is anything anybody can make up and post to a blog.

I am guessing this was an invitation to show there will be plenty of dirt for a conservative media outlet to dig for,if Hillary manages to get asked to the big dance.

No, I was not talking about what they --the Corporate Media-- can spin and invent. Quite the contrary.

I was talking about any actual *dirt* that the Media can bring to bear that has substantive facts to back it up.

Instead of giving me a dozen links to blogs and such where opinions are bandied about, just name for me the *dirt* that you think there is credible evidence for her having been involved in.

To reiterate............

I don't want her for president, but this ""plenty of dirt to be found"" is a new one on me.

I'd be curious to know, LQ.........what is all this 'dirt', in your view.

Take a couple of what you consider to be the most credible of your blog entries/links, and tell me how and why you think they comprise compelling evidence of *dirt* on her.