You know its funny Waldo,

I said to myself, 'should I post the link or not'.

If I do post it-the posters in denial will knit pick the link,

and guess what.

Now-I could always look into the links of every company in the United States,

make a list of who works in Military related Industry,

then I could do it again for their suppliers-and their suppliers suppliers,

but as Ive proved my point and life is too short,I wont bother.

Face it-America depends of war and military to exist.

It's not nit-picking, it's eviscerating. Don't worry you won't have to look at every company and it's links, your wrl buddies (or the other groups listed in the linds) would do it for you. If they could make an argument along those lines they'd be all over it. That such an argument doesn't exist tells you how weak it would be.
Paul here's a simple question. Why can't these fringe groups get any mainstream economist or accounting firm to back up their 'analysis'? When they get someone like Pricewaterhouse or KPMG to sign off then you'll get me on your side of the fence, in fact at that point it will be a tidal wave.

I wasnt aware that anyone was looking.

That said-its a simple fact,which seems impossible to change,without ripping the US economy to shreds.

Who wants to do that?

Great math they do. don't count a chunk (social security) of gov't revenue (where did that suddenly go, just disappeared into the ether.....apparently the gov't gets people to work for free:rolleyes:) and attribute all the debt to past military spending. :rolleyes::rolleyes: and "the military portion" of other departments. :rolleyes::rolleyes: :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Waldo seems to be ignorant of the differences between expenses (military spending) and investments (social security). If one were honest, one might complain that Social Security is not counted as income, since they use it as a slush fund right now anyway.

http://www.warresisters.org/piechart.htm

Excellent link, paul.

The chart shows the real world accounting of how the monies are being spent, not the smoke-and-mirrors method the government uses to keep the sheep in a state of ignorance as to how much of our taxes actually flow each year to the military/Industrial complex.

""From 1949 to 1999 the United States spent $ 7.1 trillion on "national defense." As a result, the national debt is $ 5.6 trillion, of which $ 3.6 trillion is owed to the public, and $ 2 trillion to the Social Security-Medicare Trust Funds, all due to military spending and to the servicing of the debt thus incurred. Ffty years ago, Harry Truman replaced the old republic with a national-security state whose sole purpose is to wage perpetual wars, hot, cold, and tepid. Exact date of replacement? February 27, 1947. Place: The White House Cabinet Room. Cast: Truman, Undersecretary of State Dean Acheson, a handful of congressional leaders. Republican senator Arthur Vandenberg told Truman that he could have his militarized economy only IF he first "scared the hell out of the American people" that the Russians were coming. Truman obliged. Thus the perpetual war began. Representative government of, by, and for the people is now a faded memory. Only Corporate America enjoys representation by the Congress and presidents that it pays for in an arrangement where no one is entirely accountable because those who have bought the government also own the media. Now, with the revolt of the Praetorian Guard at the Pentagon, we are entering a new and dangerous phase. Although we regularly stigmatize other societies as rogue states, we ourselves have become the largest rogue state of all. We honor no treaties. We spurn international courts. We strike unilaterally wherever we choose. We give orders to the United Nations but do not pay our dues...we bomb, invade, subvert other states. Although We the People of the United States are the sole source of legitimate authority in this land, we are no longer represented in Congress Assembled. Our Congress has been hijacked by Corporate America and its enforcer, the imperial military machine...""________Gore Vidal

Here's another one for you. It shows debt as a percentage of GDP. As you can see the debt declines from the end of WWII thru to 1980.

http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

The import of the graph is twofold. It obliterates the idea that the US economy was/is built on war. Thru that time frame their were two wars, totalling 12 years. The economy grew fastest during periods when there were no wars going on. Figure that.

Since Vietnam, the US has been involved in one war, the present one, yet debt as grown. The debt is unrelated to military spending but rather can be attributed to the explosion of entitlement programs. Another one to figure.

If there is no war going on but debt is being added please explain how you lunatic website gets to 80% of the national debt being militarily related.

Waldo seems to be ignorant of the differences between expenses (military spending) and investments (social security).

Social security as an investment. Now there's a hoot. What return are we getting on our 'investment' in 80 year old people?

Excellent link, paul.

The chart shows the real world accounting of how the monies are being spent, not the smoke-and-mirrors method the government uses to keep the sheep in a state of ignorance as to how much of our taxes actually flow each year to the military/Industrial complex.

Which accounting firm provided this 'real world" accounting? :rolleyes:

France: A beautiful country-great cuisine-great culture-great soccer team-Paris-fine wines-great language-fiercely independant-good cars and fast trains....
"Fiercely independent"!?! LMFAO!

Keep snoozing, Paul - France, in all it's glorious splendor, has, historically speaking, an incredibly high unemployment rate, and the French people are overwhelmingly temperamental, proud (figure that one out!?), arrogant, aloof, and undisciplined. Their chief contributions to Western civilization include champagne, whine (pardon the pun), cheese, the guillotine, body odor, and homosexuals.

Although France likes to think of itself as a modern nation, air conditioning is rarely found. Go figure, eh?

Oh, and the best part is, men sometimes have girls' names like "Marie" and they, more often than not, kiss one another when they greet. Now I don't know about you, but I find that quite telling, actually...
...St Tropez-great lovers [not that youd know].
Rest assured, if I really wanted French pussy that badly, Paul - all I'd have to do is threaten her with terrorism, and voila - she'd bend over for me faster than her grandmother did for the Nazis in WW2.
Cant see much wrong with that-oh thats right-a couple of old guys formed a Government in Vichy long long ago-yep-they're a real bad country.
Oh, that's right - you guys in Ireland don't see a problem with that, do you? Even today, France's Parliament consists of two chambers - the Upper and Lower, and it's members are either Gaullists or communists; neither of whom can be trusted.

But, hey - "What do you expect from a culture that exerted more of its national will fighting against Disney World and Big Macs than against the Nazis?" - Dennis Miller

Their chief contributions to Western civilization include ... homosexuals.
All gay people are French? :eek:

Which accounting firm provided this 'real world" accounting?

No "accounting firm" was necessary.

The facts are there for anyone to see.

All gay people are French? :eek:

I don't think the Great French Actor and Vintner
Gerard *Depardieu would agree.Leaving school at the tender age of 13
becoming a delinquent & wanderer only to acheive The Title :

'Chevalier du Legion d'Honneur'


* " I'm happy with very little on this earth,but I do like to have a
lot in my glass ." [ on his love for Wine ]

No "accounting firm" was necessary.

The facts are there for anyone to see.


IOW the argument put forward by paul is all make beleive. :woohoo:

"Fiercely independent"!?! LMFAO!

Keep snoozing, Paul - France, in all it's glorious splendor, has, historically speaking, an incredibly high unemployment rate, and the French people are overwhelmingly temperamental, proud (figure that one out!?), arrogant, aloof, and undisciplined. Their chief contributions to Western civilization include champagne, whine (pardon the pun), cheese, the guillotine, body odor, and homosexuals.

Although France likes to think of itself as a modern nation, air conditioning is rarely found. Go figure, eh?

Oh, and the best part is, men sometimes have girls' names like "Marie" and they, more often than not, kiss one another when they greet. Now I don't know about you, but I find that quite telling, actually...

Rest assured, if I really wanted French pussy that badly, Paul - all I'd have to do is threaten her with terrorism, and voila - she'd bend over for me faster than her grandmother did for the Nazis in WW2.

Oh, that's right - you guys in Ireland don't see a problem with that, do you? Even today, France's Parliament consists of two chambers - the Upper and Lower, and it's members are either Gaullists or communists; neither of whom can be trusted.

But, hey - "What do you expect from a culture that exerted more of its national will fighting against Disney World and Big Macs than against the Nazis?" - Dennis MillerJesus man-you really did take it bad when she dumped ya.

Move on-get yourself a Miss Illinois,as long as she can stick listening to your Ann Coulter tapes every nite-good luck to her-she'll need it.:)

IOW the argument put forward by paul is all make beleive. :woohoo:

The facts are never "make beleive" <sic>

_____________________________

With the 9/11 attacks, the PNAC warmongers finally got what they had long prayed for; a cataclysmic event that transformed an entire population. They had the catalyst for war, for imperial conquest and corporate despotism. They had their "new Pearl Harbor", a convenient excuse to begin their headlong march towards imperial hegemony, corporate domination, an American police state and an emerging fascist Empire.

Oh, and the best part is, men sometimes have girls' names like "Marie" and they, more often than not, kiss one another when they greet. Now I don't know about you, but I find that quite telling, actually....

What I find more *telling* is the degree to which certain (purported) heterosexuals fret and worry themselves over such an occurrence, which has nothing to do with them.

As an after thought-dont American men have Surnames as Christian names,

so what.

All gay people are French? :eek:
At heart, yes. :D

You know, it's the old igloo / Eskimo thing; all igloos have Eskimos living inside, but not all Eskimos live in igloos. :)

What I find more *telling* is the degree to which certain (purported) heterosexuals fret and worry themselves over such an occurrence, which has nothing to do with them.
Relax - it was more of a joke than anything else. Personally, I don't have a problem with homosexuals at all. You should know me better than that, FT.

As an after thought-dont American men have Surnames as Christian names,

so what.
And you don't think French people do? St. Pierre? What's your point?

My point is-you were saying that French men are given 'girls' names.

I just pointed out American men are given 'surnames'.

Whats your point?

The facts are never "make beleive" <sic>

_____________________________

With the 9/11 attacks, the PNAC warmongers finally got what they had long prayed for; a cataclysmic event that transformed an entire population. They had the catalyst for war, for imperial conquest and corporate despotism. They had their "new Pearl Harbor", a convenient excuse to begin their headlong march towards imperial hegemony, corporate domination, an American police state and an emerging fascist Empire.

Well, like joseph smith one needs similar types of glasses to 'see' your facts.:eek:

My point is-you were saying that French men are given 'girls' names.

I just pointed out American men are given 'surnames'.

Whats your point?
Ahhh - I get it...you were being cryptically clever. You threw me off with the "Christian" part.

Cryptically clever-no.

What youd call first name,we would call Christian name.

Some examples:

Bradley
Barry
Shanon
Floyd

Cryptically clever-no.

What youd call first name,we would call Christian name.

Some examples:

Bradley
Barry
Shanon
Floyd
Okay, sure - many of the old timers around here use the "Christian" description to designate a first name, too. It's not used that widely anymore, but whatever, I understand, and if it makes you feel any better - "Mea Culpa". :(

You know, it's JMO, but you should probably quote the specific word you're looking to pun in the future (especially in light of the fact that punctuation is all but absent in Paul-speak). I mean, seriously - I think that alone would go a long way to helping most people decipher your witticisms, but hey...I'm just one person here, so please....by all means, feel free to ignore quote tags and simple punctuation all you want; it's totally your choice, dude. :)

Well thank you.

I think I like things the way they are.

Relax - it was more of a joke than anything else. Personally, I don't have a problem with homosexuals at all. You should know me better than that, FT.

Yeah, I do. :cool:

I just had to make a little jibe.

Well, like joseph smith one needs similar types of glasses to 'see' your facts.

No.

It is numbers. Numbers that do not need any special apparatus in order be seen.

No.

It is numbers. Numbers that do not need any special apparatus in order be seen.

Then why can't you get any accounting firm to sign on to your 'numbers'? As i said earlier, a classic case of figures don't lie and liars figure. You my friend fall into the latter category.

It's fuzzy math.

Well thank you.

I think I like things the way they are.
Wow - you really are an Irishman, Paul; you're stubborn to a freaking fault. :)

Yeah, I do. :cool:

I just had to make a little jibe.
Come to think of it, I wouldn't expect anything less. :D You know, I guess that's kinda why I like it here so much....

No.

It is numbers. Numbers that do not need any special apparatus in order be seen.
That's true....that's all they are; "numbers"

Remember that next time you proffer them here.

a classic case of figures don't lie and liars figure.

Very true.

Sadly, you have it backwards as to who is using the figures to lie and who is using them to point out the facts.

The Government LIES when it misrepresents what portion of our budget goes toward military/Defense spending.

The page the link points to gives the real story.

(why you are so hung up on having some *accounting firm* validate the way the budgetary numbers should be looked at, I have no idea)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

THE FEDERAL BUDGET FOR FY 2007

Discretionary spending is the money the President and Congress must prioritize and appropriate each year. Of this, just over half goes to the Pentagon (not including funding for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan) while the remainder goes to all other discretionary programs.

The true figures for what is being thrown down the black hole of the Pentagon are...


TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF FY 2007 DEFENSE AND SECURITY-RELATED SPENDING

Defense Department and defense functions of the Department of Energy --$462.8 billion

Supplemental Appropriations for Military Operations in Iraq/Afghanistan ----$173.0 billion

Other Security-Related Funding ----------- ------------------------------$352.8 billion

Total Defense and Security-Related Spending -------------------- ------$988.6 billion

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

All figures are either contained in or derived from the summary tables to accompany the Fiscal Year 2008 Federal Budget Request, the Office of Management and Budget, available online (http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2008/summarytables.html).

Wow - you really are an Irishman, Paul; you're stubborn to a freaking fault. :)Yep-and you really are a yank,

a dumb yank.

Very true.

Sadly, you have it backwards as to who is using the figures to lie and who is using them to point out the facts.

The Government LIES when it misrepresents what portion of our budget goes toward military/Defense spending.

The page the link points to gives the real story.

(why you are so hung up on having some *accounting firm* validate the way the budgetary numbers should be looked at, I have no idea)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

THE FEDERAL BUDGET FOR FY 2007

Discretionary spending is the money the President and Congress must prioritize and appropriate each year. Of this, just over half goes to the Pentagon (not including funding for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan) while the remainder goes to all other discretionary programs.

The true figures for what is being thrown down the black hole of the Pentagon are...


TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF FY 2007 DEFENSE AND SECURITY-RELATED SPENDING

Defense Department and defense functions of the Department of Energy --$462.8 billion

Supplemental Appropriations for Military Operations in Iraq/Afghanistan ----$173.0 billion

Other Security-Related Funding ----------- ------------------------------$352.8 billion

Total Defense and Security-Related Spending -------------------- ------$988.6 billion

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

All figures are either contained in or derived from the summary tables to accompany the Fiscal Year 2008 Federal Budget Request, the Office of Management and Budget, available online (http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2008/summarytables.html).

Why am i hung up on it? Because it would be an impartial third party arbitrer that verify's their accounting methodolgy. Because they can't/won't get an accounting firm to verify their numbers it's merely another talking point for the pointed heads amongst us.

That you can't even read your own link properly. Have you ever taken a course in accounting? Do you even know how to read the document? The document properly says much about your ability to understand the problem. Table 1 (Budget Totals) gives you total income and total outlays. Table S10 gives you spending by category. Notice that the sums for the total budget in 7 are the same as in 1, $2.7trillion. For security the number says $622 billion. Where you've derived these other numbers from is one of the great mysteries.

Yep-and you really are a yank,

a dumb yank.
Ouch, man.....coming from you that really hurts.

Ouch, man.....coming from you that really hurts.
So it should.

No doubt college educated-just shows, brains and common sense dont mix.

Ouch, man.....coming from you that really hurts.

Pardon me BARGING IN, but dint you like the lovely dinner I made for few nights ago????

Why oh why must you leave me in the dark ? ? ?

:confused: :confused:

I didn't want you to make dinner for me, stupid....I just told you to make it "promptly"; presumably for your boyfriend or husband, but seeing as to the quality of your home cookin', I'm sure if he wanted one of your "treats", all he'd have to do is discuss politics with you. Now, there's having to eat a shit sandwich, IMHO....

I didn't want you to make dinner for me, stupid....I just told you to make it "promptly"; presumably for your boyfriend or husband, but seeing as to the quality of your home cookin', I'm sure if he wanted one of your "treats", all he'd have to do is discuss politics with you. Now, there's having to eat a shit sandwich, IMHO....

Never in my life have I encountered someone with such an infinitesimal sense of humor as you.

UnFukkingBelievable

Never in my life have I encountered someone with such an infinitesimal sense of humor as you.

UnFukkingBelievable


You don't appear in yer OWN Dreams.... Danny ?

Never in my life have I encountered someone with such an infinitesimal sense of humor as you.

UnFukkingBelievable

Interesting choice of an adjective there, Scummy...."infinitesimal", eh??? Hmmm....I don't think I've ever heard it used in that context before....

You know, you probably would've been better off going with something like, "weak", "shallow", "poor", etc. - but NOOOoooo, you had to go with (well, essentially), "minute".....:confused:

Oh, wait a moment - I get it!!! :eek:...you went with the only 6-syllable word in your insult repertoire, didn't you, you goddamned showboater?!?!?!? :thumbs: Well, touche, bitch! I can't think of ONE word with 6 syllables, soooooooooo......nicely done. You got me this time, but we WILL meet again, and next time, I'm pullin' out all the stops.

Oh, and FYI - the words, "as you" at the end of your sentence were superfluous. Rest assured, it's implied in the first portion.

That said, why don't you go feed your man another shit sandwich and shut the "fukk" up!? :)

Thaaaanks.

Interesting choice of an adjective there, Scummy...."infinitesimal", eh??? Hmmm....I don't think I've ever heard it used in that context before....

You know, you probably would've been better off going with something like, "weak", "shallow", "poor", etc. - but NOOOoooo, you had to go with (well, essentially), "minute"?!?!

Oh, wait a moment - I get it!!! :eek:...you just HAD to go for the only 6-syllable word in your insult repertoire, didn't you, you goddamned showboater?!?!?!? :thumbs:

Oh, and not to nitpick here, but FYI - the words, "as you" at the end of your sentence were superfluous. Rest assured, it's implied in the first portion.

That said, why don't you go feed your man a shit another sandwich and shut the "fukk" up!? :)

Thaaaanks.

Well thank you, Grammar Nazi :@@:

But ya know, I noticed a mistake in yer post as well and I'd like to point it out so here goes...

<<<That said, why don't you go feed your man a shit another sandwich and shut the "fukk" up!? >>>

Goodness, I don't actually have to zero in on the mistake, do I? I mean, yer smart enuff to identify it, yes?

Does dyslexia run in yer family or is that a trait all of yer own?

Gosh, I'm gettin hungry. Time for me to get outta here and go make a yummy samich!

I'll be back after I feel my rumblin' gut.

Bye, you horses patootski ! !

Interesting choice of an adjective there, Scummy...."infinitesimal", eh??? Hmmm....I don't think I've ever heard it used in that context before....

You know, you probably would've been better off going with something like, "weak", "shallow", "poor", etc. - but NOOOoooo, you had to go with (well, essentially), "minute".....:confused:

Oh, wait a moment - I get it!!! :eek:...you went with the only 6-syllable word in your insult repertoire, didn't you, you goddamned showboater?!?!?!? :thumbs: Well, touche, bitch! I can't think of ONE word with 6 syllables, soooooooooo......nicely done. You got me this time, but we WILL meet again, and next time, I'm pullin' out all the stops.

Oh, and FYI - the words, "as you" at the end of your sentence were superfluous. Rest assured, it's implied in the first portion.

That said, why don't you go feed your man another shit sandwich and shut the "fukk" up!? :)

Thaaaanks.

*********************************
Hay... Only I,Er uh well Me,me,me,me... Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee can talk to
Scummy dat a ways.
Cuz we GOad waaaaaaaay back.
Almost as far the Chimps and yer next a kin.

Goodness, I don't actually have to zero in on the mistake, do I? I mean, yer smart enuff to identify it, yes?

Does dyslexia run in yer family or is that a trait all of yer own?
Well, I'm at work - so I can only type OR correct my entries when I'm afforded the opportunity. On that note, it certainly doesn't look good when the "boss" has a website open (in plain view of everyone) that's chock full of emoticons and flashy avatars.

That aside, I most certainly am NOT a grammar Nazi. Actually, I fancy understanding someone's logic more than anything else, which was *primarily* what I was taking you to task on in the first place, but whatever....

Oh, and in answer to your question, yes, I'm dyslexic, and yes, it runs in my family. Then again, so does wealth, intelligence, political influence, good looks, and small penises. ::SIGH:: :( Yes, unfortunately, it's all true, but just outta curiosity - do you know what the BEST part about having a small penis is when you're wealthy and good-looking? The fact that it really doesn't matter! I mean, seriously, in the grand scheme of things, by the time she knows, it's already in her mouth, and you know what....that's right where it should be. :)

On that note, I learned a long time ago that I can't have everything in life, but somehow, I've learned to cope with my, well, "inadequacies" as best I can - one day at a time.

Yes, unfortunately, it's all true, but just outta curiosity - do you know what the BEST part about having a small penis is when you're wealthy and good-looking? The fact that it really doesn't matter! I mean, seriously, in the grand scheme of things, by the time she knows, it's already in her mouth, and you know what....that's right where it should be. :)
Plus it fits better.... I bet big guys never get a really good blow job... :D

Plus it fits better.... I bet big guys never get a really good blow job... :D
No kidding. I always feel bad for porno chicks. Speaking of which, where the fuck do they find those people!?!?

*********************************
Hay... Only I,Er uh well Me,me,me,me... Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee can talk to
Scummy dat a ways.
Cuz we GOad waaaaaaaay back.
Almost as far the Chimps and yer next a kin.

What's that ya say, Gertrude??

Well, I'm at work - so I can only type OR correct my entries when I'm afforded the opportunity. On that note, it certainly doesn't look good when the "boss" has a website open (in plain view of everyone) that's chock full of emoticons and flashy avatars.

That aside, I most certainly am NOT a grammar Nazi. Actually, I fancy understanding someone's logic more than anything else, which was *primarily* what I was taking you to task on in the first place, but whatever....

Oh, and in answer to your question, yes, I'm dyslexic, and yes, it runs in my family. Then again, so does wealth, intelligence, political influence, good looks, and small penises. ::SIGH:: :( Yes, unfortunately, it's all true, but just outta curiosity - do you know what the BEST part about having a small penis is when you're wealthy and good-looking? The fact that it really doesn't matter! I mean, seriously, in the grand scheme of things, by the time she knows, it's already in her mouth, and you know what....that's right where it should be. :)

On that note, I learned a long time ago that I can't have everything in life, but somehow, I've learned to cope with my, well, "inadequacies" as best I can - one day at a time.


I too, am at work *yawn* and I know what you mean about flashy avatars/emoticons/signatures. I used to have a large, very cute, wiggly rat but alas, I now use a non-flashy small peace sign. Hmmm… I have a strong suspicion that “peace signs” make you writhe in yer skivvies, am I correct? Of course I am. When am I not?

Please don’t answer that ;-)

Well, it’s charming that dyslexia, wealth, intelligence, political influence, good looks, and small penises run in yer family but that brings me to one question:

Is it usual for the men in most families to compare penis sizes???

Good gawd, I have never have even thought of that, not even once. Hmmm. Very perplexing indeed. But funny!

And as far as this comment goes..…<< that's right where it should be.>>>

My hungry mouth is WIDE OPEN.


LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!

Too fukkin funny

:lolhit:

Come to think of it, I wouldn't expect anything less. :D You know, I guess that's kinda why I like it here so much....

Well...well...WELD! That's nice to know.
I can cede I'll need to work me magic.Knock a feud yer
screwballs,out the park.
Won't be too hard.From the simplistic logic yer junior high debating
skills rely upon.Is all.

Plus it fits better.... I bet big guys never get a really good blow job... :D

Ya mean like Anastasia Blue ?

Ya mean like Anastasia Blue ?
Forgive my ignorance, but what (or who) is "Anastasia Blue"?

Plus it fits better.... I bet big guys never get a really good blow job... :D
:eek:


































there's no such thing as a bad BJ!, just some better than others-and it's all a matter of perspective. you don't miss what you've never had;)

there's no such thing as a bad BJ!, just some better than others-and it's all a matter of perspective. you don't miss what you've never had;)
Well yeah but there's a difference between good and REALLY good...

Well yeah but there's a difference between good and REALLY good...
but if you never had it, how would you know?

it's an opinion, not a comparable fact.

Hmmm… I have a strong suspicion that “peace signs” make you writhe in yer skivvies, am I correct?
Not as much as the hippies who display 'em.
Well, it’s charming that dyslexia, wealth, intelligence, political influence, good looks, and small penises run in yer family but that brings me to one question:

Is it usual for the men in most families to compare penis sizes???
Physically compare!? No way. Joke about? Absolutely. I know where I stand, and 6.25 inches is nothing to brag about, so I make fun of myself. Hell, I'm sure the women I sleep with do, but once again - I'm done at that point, so they can "joke" away as far as I'm concerned.
I used to have a large, very cute, wiggly rat....
And you think that when family members joke about their penis size with one another, it's "funny" (with the obvious implication here being "weird")!? :eek:

Hell, if I'm not mistaken, you, at one point in time in real life, owned a goddamned RAT and kept it as a pet, lady. Spare me the lecture on what's weird in your mind, will ya? ::shivers::

If not, then I apologize.
And as far as this comment goes..…<< that's right where it should be.>>>

My hungry mouth is WIDE OPEN.
Well, at least you've got dating potential. On that note, that's the ONLY reason your mouth should be open. Especially your mouth. :D

Well you're above average... Or the supposed average. I wouldn't call 6.25 inches tiny or anything.

Forgive my ignorance, but what (or who) is "Anastasia Blue"?

Like juts THE most fantastic little chickie pooh ever to do
what you suggested.
However she did it to earn money for her college education.

there's no such thing as a bad BJ!
Then you haven't had very many. Give it some time. It'll come. You won't, but that day will....

I've had my shit damn near wrecked before by careless chicks (I've had to stop 4 women entirely). Some are actually under the delusion that teeth feel "good" on a man's johnson. Uh, no hun....I assure you, they do NOT, under ANY circumstances, feel "good". Oh, and if you're not doing this already, then start using your goddamned hands, for Christ's sake – they're essential.

Some women just don't get it.

Then you haven't had very many. Give it some time. It'll come. You won't, but that day will....

I've had my shit damn near wrecked before by careless chicks (I've had to stop 4 women entirely). Some are actually under the delusion that teeth feel "good" on a man's johnson. Uh, no hun....I assure you, they do NOT, under ANY circumstances, feel "good". Oh, and if you're not doing this already, then start using your goddamned hands, for Christ's sake – they're essential.

Some women just don't get it.


************************
Please ! No details.Just give us yer pearly white smile and little
Jackie Cooper blushing of face.I'd Ban yer filthy mouth,butt
then what wood you and Mommsie talk about at Din-din.

Then you haven't had very many. Give it some time. It'll come. You won't, but that day will....

I've had my shit damn near wrecked before by careless chicks (I've had to stop 4 women entirely). Some are actually under the delusion that teeth feel "good" on a man's johnson. Uh, no hun....I assure you, they do NOT, under ANY circumstances, feel "good". Oh, and if you're not doing this already, then start using your goddamned hands, for Christ's sake – they're essential.

Some women just don't get it.
Some guys like a little tooth action, but you NEVER bring it on unless they tell you to (and no guy has ever told me to, so I haven't)! :p

Like juts THE most fantastic little chickie pooh ever to do
what you suggested.
However she did it to earn money for her college education.
Aha... I looked her up on Wikipedia. :p

Some guys like a little tooth action, but you NEVER bring it on unless they tell you to (and no guy has ever told me to, so I haven't)! :p

I knew you weren't right.
Yer a BaD cookie thar tOOt's.
Guys only like naughty tooT's in the dark of Nite.

I knew you weren't right.
Yer a BaD cookie thar tOOt's.
Guys only like naughty tooT's in the dark of Nite.
LOL.... Is that kinda like the more modern saying "lady in the street, freak in the bed"?

Aha... I looked her up on Wikipedia. :p

U Woody,
Harrowing Harlot !

Woody?! Wow, I have never been described that way before. :p

Then you haven't had very many. Give it some time. It'll come. You won't, but that day will....

I've had my shit damn near wrecked before by careless chicks (I've had to stop 4 women entirely). Some are actually under the delusion that teeth feel "good" on a man's johnson. Uh, no hun....I assure you, they do NOT, under ANY circumstances, feel "good". Oh, and if you're not doing this already, then start using your goddamned hands, for Christ's sake – they're essential.

Some women just don't get it.
you need to learn to communicate those details before it gets to that point:rolleyes:

Woody?! Wow, I have never been described that way before. :p

yeah...yeah...yeah... Probably interned on Pickles out
of Uncle Fester's Pickle barrel durin the rush hour,down to his
General Store in summertime as a Yuuut !

you need to learn to communicate those details before it gets to that point:rolleyes:
Yeah - it's been my experience they always respond favorably when you tell 'em, in explicit detail no less, how to fellate you properly. ":rolleyes:" That said, I usually don't make it a habit to "instruct" my sexual partners - unless, of course, I'm steadily dating the girl in question (and even then, it can be a hassle (depending on the chick, obviously)).

Look, my point was simple - there IS such a thing as a "bad" blowjob, and your instruction notwithstanding, you can't ignore the fact that sometimes (read; more often than not), when a horse staggers, it's lame.

Yeah - it's been my experience they always respond favorably when you tell 'em, in explicit detail no less, how to fellate you properly. ":rolleyes:" That said, I usually don't make it a habit to "instruct" my sexual partners - unless, of course, I'm steadily dating the girl in question (and even then, it can be a hassle (depending on the chick, obviously)).

Look, my point was simple - there IS such a thing as a "bad" blowjob, and your instruction notwithstanding, you can't ignore the fact that sometimes (read; more often than not), when a horse staggers, it's lame.

********************************
Man I niver thought you were dat weird.
Waitin around fer horses to stagger,and all.
What did you do for an encore in yer Family's Carny Show.?

************************
Please ! No details.Just give us yer pearly white smile and little
Jackie Cooper blushing of face.I'd Ban yer filthy mouth,butt
then what wood you and Mommsie talk about at Din-din.
And I'd ban you for making it universally difficult to parse your enigmatic (and usually, condescending) bullshit, weirdo.

Maybe you should double up on your meds and go change your diaper, old man - but then again, what would you have to babble about over "din-din" as your caregiver's forced to spoon-feed you at 4:00 o'clock this afternoon?

********************************
Man I niver thought you were dat weird.
Waitin around fer horses to stagger,and all.
What did you do for an encore in yer Family's Carny Show.?
How 'bout you go fuck yourself, Foolsworth.

And I'd ban you for making it universally difficult to parse your enigmatic (and usually, condescending) bullshit, weirdo.

Maybe you should double up on your meds and go change your diaper, old man - but then again, what would you have to babble about over "din-din" as your caregiver's forced to spoon-feed you at 4:00 o'clock this afternoon?

I can-can cede yer entirely out of yer element when tryin to
make like Don Rickles.

How 'bout you go fuck yourself, Foolsworth.

Doesn't sound VERY Elder to me.
Maybe yer an Elder Juvenile.
yeah...that's it.

Well, this thread has run its course.