Ann the Man dispenses more of her "wisdom"... (http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/10/04/coulter-opposes-women-voting/)

"If we took away women’s right to vote, we’d never have to worry about another Democrat president. It’s kind of a pipe dream, it’s a personal fantasy of mine, but I don’t think it’s going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women."

so?

ROFL. This doesn't surprise me at all.

ROFL. This doesn't surprise me at all.
that she doesn't want people voting stupid? who does?

ROFL. This doesn't surprise me at all.

I agree. Neither Ann's comments nor Mikeys reaction to this post are the least bit suprising.

.

I agree. Neither Ann's comments nor Mikeys reaction to this post are the least bit suprising.

.
sorry i forgot you:rolleyes:

only someone that votes stupidly would go along with your positions.:lolhit:

I don't condemn anyone on the basis of their party affiliation.

She's probably got a book coming out.

I don't condemn anyone on the basis of their party affiliation. And your certainly act more adult like then many adults on here!:thumbs:

People should find better things to do with their time than to give it to a two-bit attention whore.

People should find better things to do with their time than to give it to a two-bit attention whore.

Normally I agree, but Ann was in my area this week, giving a rant in Howell, MI (home of the KKK in MI).

She got front-page coverage from the conservative local paper. :rolleyes:

For the most part people tried to ignore her. There was only one guy who was outside protesting her, but they had a picture of him in that paper and his sign was hilarious. It said,

"Ann, you ignorant slut!" (SNL reference)

"If we took away women’s right to vote, we’d never have to worry about another Democrat president. It’s kind of a pipe dream, it’s a personal fantasy of mine, but I don’t think it’s going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women."

Isn't Anne a single woman?

http://www.overspun.com/images/Coulter.Alien.jpg http://www.geocities.com/stevstgeo/graphics/coulter1.JPG

Oh, wait.... I guess not! :lolhit:

so?

you're gonna defend that? The mind is an amazing thing...

She did not say to just get rid of stupid voting. She said if we get rid of women's right to vote then we would get rid of stupid voting.

perhaps we should just take away her right to free speech like the left wants to do to anyone who oppsoses them in any way. even if its an obvious exageration that stupid assholes like that dick puppet dhrama spurts out without even knowing WTF is really going on.

sorry, I am just pissed off today about the whole rush limbaugh thing and seeing in plain sight the exact type of regurgitating left wing jerk off here on the boards that perpetrates such BS in the form of dhrama makes it worse.

perhaps we should just take away her right to free speech like the left wants to do

I did not hear ANYONE one on the board suggest that. I guess what most are saying is that "WOW can you believe what this media hungry, ugly, sad, bitter, person said?" and then "WOW can you believe people still listen to her?"

But nobody is suggesting that she should be muzzled!

that she doesn't want people voting stupid? who does?

You are joking with that comment right? I guess you and I are not reading Coulter's comments the same way.

But nobody is suggesting that she should be muzzled!Exactly. But the irony is that she would want herself muzzled if the coin were flipped.

Oh, ask the former democrat candidate Westly Clark who wants to rate political speech like movies and use that to decide if a particular political speech is worthy of being accepted

Exactly. But the irony is that she would want herself muzzled if the coin were flipped.

Unless AC is revealed to be the man so many want to believe she is.

Unless AC is revealed to be the man so many want to believe she is.Ouch! (If that's a dude, there's a lot more undeclared homosexuality on the Right than previously thought.):cool:

Ouch! (If that's a dude, there's a lot more undeclared homosexuality on the Right than previously thought.):cool:
Yeah, that must be it. :rolleyes:

It's so funny to see the "tolerant" left mock her for her mannish looks when, by comparison, Janet Reno makes her look like Playboy Bunny. I mean, seriously - if Ann has a cock, then I can almost guarantee it's roughly 9" shorter than Helen Thomas'.

Do you really wanna make fun of the way people look, lefties?

Prae, Reno doesn't put herself in a cocktail dress and a come hither look on whenever she decides to author yet another pointless book. Coulter puts it out there.

Prae, Reno doesn't put herself in a cocktail dress and put a come hither look on whenever she decides to author yet another pointless book. Coulter puts it out there.
Are you suggesting Reno should? For fuck's sake, Nap - she's a man in a dress, period; no Adam's apple necessary to prove that one - for Janet sports a type of "full-blown" androgyny that Ann couldn't compete with if she actually exposed her own penis on CNN, prime time.

In short, there's simply no comparison between the two. As a matter of fact, the only people who made fun of Reno's looks were the talentless asswipes on Saturday Night Live. The right was decent enough not to.

Yes, Prae, but if Janet Reno did, then the right would have. That was my point.

I understand what you're trying to say, but I really don't see it like that. "Come hither" dress or not, she's a target either way (the dress is nothing more than a convenient excuse to mock her, period). I contend that most women make fun of her because, A) she's incredibly thin, B) she's prettier and smarter than they are, and C), she's an anti-feminist.

You wanna know who hates Ann Coulter -

Women who look like this:

http://tonova.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/andrea_dworkin_monster.jpg

And yes, that woman was a king-sized (pardon the pun) liberal. She kicked off in '05. Morbid obesity. Who'd a thunk it, eh?

I really don't see it like that.
Of course you don't. You want to bone her.

I understand what you're trying to say, but I really don't see it like that. "Come hither" dress or not, she's a target either way (the dress is nothing more than a convenient excuse to mock her, period). I contend that most women make fun of her because, A) she's incredibly thin, B) she's prettier and smarter than they are, and C), she's an anti-feminist.

You wanna know who hates Ann Coulter -

Women who look like this:

http://tonova.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/andrea_dworkin_monster.jpg

And yes, that woman was a king-sized (pardon the pun) liberal. She kicked off in '05. Morbid obesity. Who'd a thunk it, eh?

It finally comes out - Prae has a thing for huge wimmens.

Of course you don't. You want to bone her.
Personally, I don't find her physically attractive (I mean, she's not horrible, but she's certainly not my type).

However, OTOH, I think the bitch has a razor-sharp wit, and that I find attractive. Her column is freaking hilarious, and she doesn't pull her punches when being interviewed. In a world full of pantywaist politicians and political commentators alike, I find Ann's irreverence refreshing, unique, funny, and at times, incredibly apropos.

I don't like Rush all that much, but I do like Ann.

It finally comes out - Prae has a thing for huge wimmens.
What!?!?! LOL.

From Rush I expect nothing but pure, unadulterated bullshit. From Ann, it's almost funny to hear or read the same comments - rather like hearing a 4 year old cuss like the proverbial sailor.

Personally, I don't find her physically attractive (I mean, she's not horrible, but she's certainly not my type). However, I think the bitch has a razor-sharp wit, and that I find attractive. Her column is freaking hilarious, and she doesn't pull her punches when being interviewed. In a world full of pantywaist politicians and political commentators alike, I find Ann's irreverence refreshing, unique, funny, and at times, incredibly apropos.

I don't like Rush all that much, but I do like Ann.
Well, I was gonna say, if you did want to bone her, I'm not so sure you'd be her type (http://ifuckedanncoulterintheasshard.blogspot.com/).

perhaps we should just take away her right to free speech like the left wants to do to anyone who oppsoses them in any way.
Nah, that's too easy. We should just fucking shoot her. :thumbs:

Of course you don't. You want to bone her.
eeeewwwwwwww

Well, I was gonna say, if you did want to bone her, I'm not so sure you'd be her type (http://ifuckedanncoulterintheasshard.blogspot.com/).
That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever read in my life.

It was entertaining, though.

That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever read in my life.

It was entertaining, though.
That's what I thought. This has been the most amusement I have had all day. That's how bad my day was. :D Keep going guys. I know this will get better.

Well, I was gonna say, if you did want to bone her, I'm not so sure you'd be her type (http://ifuckedanncoulterintheasshard.blogspot.com/).
Ha ha ha!!

If I didn't know better I'd suspect Sparky had written that. :)

Ha ha ha!!

If I didn't know better I'd suspect Sparky had written that. :)
Yeah, it really does seem like his style... He probably wouldn't be quite so explicit about it though.

This has been the most amusement I have had all day.
What was your favorite line, Sal? Mine was, "'Harder!’ she begged, ‘Harder!! Tell me what you think of Chomsky!’". I about lost it when I got to that one.

People should have to take a simple test in order to be able to vote.

Simple questions like:

Who is the current VP of the US?

Who are the Senators of your state?

How do you spell your full name?

that she doesn't want people voting stupid? who does?

People should have to take a simple test in order to be able to vote.

Simple questions like:

Who is the current VP of the US?

Who are the Senators of your state?

How do you spell your full name?
I tend to agree here, but it's a slippery slope...

How do you spell your full name?As long as you don't have to spell permit (perment), representative (repisinitive), Islamic (Islomic) or salt (sault) you should be OK. :)

It's so funny to see the "tolerant" left ...

It makes me laugh when idiotic right-wingers revel in their own intolerance.

:lolhit:

It makes me -_- when people use that hideous smilie.

It makes me -_- when people use that hideous smilie.
-_-

The Japanese smilie.

I never said my spelling is great. I can at least spell my name.
(unlike some who vote)


As long as you don't have to spell permit (perment), representative (repisinitive), Islamic (Islomic) or salt (sault) you should be OK. :)

Come on man, left wingers are far from tolerant.

Leftwingers love free speech unless it is against their politics.

Many of you speak out agains the Christian religion every chance you get, but you have a lot of tolerance when it comes to the Muslim religion.

You sure as heck are not tolerant of Limbaugh. The latest attack on him proves it. (baseless attack I might add)

(Maybe not you Dharm, but many left wingers in general)


It makes me laugh when idiotic right-wingers revel in their own intolerance.

:lolhit:

Leftwingers love free speech unless it is against their politics.

I guess you haven't heard about Bush's "free-speech zones."

Bush Zones Go National (http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20040816&s=hightower)

At the 2000 GOP nominating convention in Philadelphia, candidate Bush created a fenced-in, out-of-sight protest zone that could only hold barely 1,500 people at a time. So citizens who wished to give voice to their many grievances with the Powers That Be had to:

(1) Schedule their exercise of First Amendment rights with the decidedly unsympathetic authorities.

(2) Report like cattle to the protest pen at their designated time, and only in the numbers authorized.

(3) Then, under the recorded surveillance of the authorities, feel free to let loose with all the speech they could utter within their allotted minutes (although no one--not Bush, not convention delegates, not the preening members of Congress, not the limousine-gliding corporate sponsors and certainly not the mass media--would be anywhere nearby to hear a single word of what they had to say).

Once ensconced in the White House, the Bushites institutionalized the art of dissing dissent, routinely dispatching the Secret Service to order local police to set up FSZs to quarantine protesters wherever Bush goes. The embedded media trooping dutifully behind him almost never cover this fascinating and truly newsworthy phenomenon, instead focusing almost entirely on spoon-fed soundbites from the President's press office.

Many of you speak out agains the Christian religion every chance you get, but you have a lot of tolerance when it comes to the Muslim religion.


:rolleyes:

I'm wondering if you can name one person here who fits that description.

I challenge you to do so.

Come on man, left wingers are far from tolerant.

Leftwingers love free speech unless it is against their politics.


Left wingers are by definition, more tolerant than right wingers. That doesn't mean they will tolerate anything. Some stupidity is just too great to be left unchallenged.

Yet as Chris Matthews pointed out this week, the Bush administration has called his producers and the network and tried to get the editorial content of his show changed. As much as he badmouthed The Clinton administration, he admitted they never tried to do such a thing.

.

Come on man, left wingers are far from tolerant.

Leftwingers love free speech unless it is against their politics.

Many of you speak out agains the Christian religion every chance you get, but you have a lot of tolerance when it comes to the Muslim religion.

You sure as heck are not tolerant of Limbaugh. The latest attack on him proves it. (baseless attack I might add)

(Maybe not you Dharm, but many left wingers in general)
Well, you know. We could be intolerant of Limbaugh like you guys are intolerant of Muslims, and just kill the poor fuck.

:rolleyes:

I'm wondering if you can name one person here who fits that description.

I challenge you to do so.

There a gaggle of Posters who fit the description.
In all due candor,I must admit that God did give Geese
more sense that these Gaggle poachers.
So let the flight of fancy continue on.
We gots some time ford Winter kicks in .

As long as you don't have to spell permit (perment), representative (repisinitive), Islamic (Islomic) or salt (sault) you should be OK. :)
You forgot opinion (oppinion), and pregnant (pregnate).

Some stupidity is just too great to be left unchallenged.
And who better to challenge it than you, Corky???

Yeah.

I'll buy that one for a dollar.

And who better to challenge it than you...


How did you know I was thinking of your stupidity when I wrote that?

:thumbs:
DB

:rolleyes:

I'm wondering if you can name one person here who fits that description.

I challenge you to do so.

how about you?

how about you?
FT has no faith, whatsoever. He's nothing short of a communist heathen.

that is true, he has no issues with calling anyone who believes in a higher power a brain dead idiot.

Originally Posted by gmsisko1
Many of you speak out agains the Christian religion every chance you get, but you have a lot of tolerance when it comes to the Muslim religion.

I'm wondering if you can name one person here who fits that description.

I challenge you to do so.


how about you?

Nope. Not at all.

I have no "tolerance for" the Muslim religion or its adherants.

They are every bit as delusional and as ignorant as the rest of the religionists on the planet.

____________________

Still waiting for gmsisko to name one person here who --- ""speaks out against the Christian religion every chance they get but has a lot of tolerance when it comes to the Muslim religion"".

FT has no faith, whatsoever.

True.

He's nothing short of a communist heathen.

Heathen, definitely. Communist, no.

________________________

There is no evidence at all for the existence of a supernatural Supreme Being. It's only fear of death and egotism that makes us invent a God who will give us "everlasting life". Religious people often accuse atheists of being arrogant and of placing ourselves in the position of God, but really it is the theist who has all the vanity. He can't stand to think that he will ever cease to exist. ____Marian Noel Sherman

Keep the non-faith!

Keep the non-faith!

LOL.

Ok, AFT, but i'd like to point out that "Keep the non-faith" is a bit of a non sequitur.

*non-faith* is the defacto condition of homo sapiens. Having *non-faith* is akin to possessing the breathing reflex. When you are born, it comes standard.

"Faith" comes about after intensive brainwashing or indoctrination of some sort has warped the mind and altered the human being's ability to reason and think. "Faith" is a mental condition a person must choose to have.

so who brainwashed the first people?

so who brainwashed the first people?

Some charlatan/phony shaman/medicine man who recognized the world's greatest scam and the best way to control the ignorant and the gullible.

so who brainwashed him?

Faith is an oasis in the heart which will never be reached by the caravan of thinking
--Kahlil Gibran

standard.

"Faith" comes about after intensive brainwashing or indoctrination of some sort has warped the mind and altered the human being's ability to reason and think. "Faith" is a mental condition a person must choose to have.Claim #1 and Claim #2 don't fit well, do they? Is it a choice if a person has been brainwashed, mind-warped?

so who brainwashed him?
Yer mom.

who brainwashed her?

Some hobo on the street.

who brainwashed him?

Yer mom. It's a vicious cycle.

so who brainwashed the first people?


Some charlatan/phony shaman/medicine man who recognized the world's greatest scam and the best way to control the ignorant and the gullible.


so who brainwashed him?

?!?!?!

No one.

He was fully aware that belief in the supernatural/religious was totally unfounded.

He simply recognized that he could use other people's stupidity and gullibility to control them.

Claim #1 and Claim #2 don't fit well, do they?

Yes, they fit quite well.

Is it a choice if a person has been brainwashed, mind-warped?

Yes.

AFTER they have undergone the brainwashing/indoctrination, they consciously make the choice to abandon reason and rationality and instead embrace "faith".

Faith is an oasis in the heart which will never be reached by the caravan of thinking
--Kahlil Gibran

I could not agree more.

To embrace "faith" is to completely abandon critical thinking.........i.e., it equates to an abandonment of rational thought.

no it doesn't. It takes the complete adandonment of rational thought to think that though.

I could not agree more.

To embrace "faith" is to completely abandon critical thinking.........i.e., it equates to an abandonment of rational thought.
Sadly, you missed the message behind that rather beautiful quote. In a reasonable mind, the concepts of faith and critical thinking aren't at odds with one another. At all, actually. OTOH, feel free to wear your pocket protectors and push those taped glasses further up your nose all you want while proclaiming "there's no proof of faith in science, hence I've concluded the indoctrinated masses have undergone a form of brainwashing in which they've made a conscious choice to abandon reason and rationality for their beliefs".

Well, Poindexter, you may be right. You can't prove faith, but it exists in the human heart as a fundamental part of who we are. There's an internal compass inextricably linked to the concept of it; for example, faith in mankind, faith in love, faith in doing what's right, and faith in your wife.

Fundamentally, something's missing in your life to make you such an embittered, godless cynic. I don't like organized religion one bit more than you do (as a matter of fact, I fucking hate it with a passion), but with that said, you're a sad man to dismiss the concept entirely because we can't "prove" it scientifically.

Take the blinders off, dude. That's a pretty black & white world you're living in.

OTOH, feel free to wear your pocket protectors and push those taped glasses further up your nose all you want while proclaiming "there's no proof of faith in science, hence I've concluded the indoctrinated masses have undergone a form of brainwashing in which they've made a conscious choice to abandon reason and rationality for their beliefs".

Ok.

But I don't wear glasses or a pocket protector.

You can't prove faith, but it exists in the human heart ...

The human heart has no synaptic connections.

...as a fundamental part of who we are.

I do not agree that "faith" is a fundamental part of the makeup of homo sapiens.

The sort of religious "faith" that we are speaking of here is, at the root of it, a belief in the supernatural.

And belief in the supernatural is a form of mental imbalance.

...I don't like organized religion one bit more than you do (as a matter of fact, I fucking hate it with a passion), but with that said, you're a sad man to dismiss the concept entirely because we can't "prove" it scientifically.

It does not take a *sad* man to dismiss it, but a rational one.

...Take the blinders off, dude. That's a pretty black & white you're living in.

Those with "faith" are the ones wearing (self imposed) blinders. And my worldview is the antithesis of a *black and white* viewpoint. The world is full of endless shades of gray.

Here's another gem from Ms. Coulter. That anyone actually sticks up for this bigoted bitch is astounding.

October 11, 2007
Coulter: We want 'Jews to be perfected'

WASHINGTON (CNN) – Conservative commentator and best-selling author Ann Coulter may find herself in the midst of a controversy for comments Monday suggesting America would be better if everyone was Christian.

Asked by CNBC host Donny Deutsch what the U.S. looks like in her dreams, Coulter said it would look like the Republican National Convention in 2004

"People were happy,” she said, according to a transcript provided to CNN by CNBC. “They're Christian. They're tolerant. They defend America."

When Deutsch responded, "It would be better if we were all Christian?" Coulter said "Yeah."

Deutsch, himself Jewish, continued to press Coulter on her remarks, asking, "We should just throw Judaism away and we should all be Christians then?"

"Yeah," Coulter responded, adding "Well, it's a lot easier. It's kind of a fast track."

"You can't possibly believe that," Deutsch responded. “You can’t possibly. You’re too educated.”

"Do you know what Christianity is?" Coulter replied. "See, we believe your religion, but you have to obey. We have the fast track program."

Later in the interview Deutsch asked Coulter if she doesn't want any Jews in the world, Coulter responded, "No, we think — we just want Jews to be perfected, as they say."

"Wow, you didn't really say that, did you," Deutsch said.


"Yeah, no,” Coulter replied. “That’s what Christianity is. We believe the Old Testament, but ours is more like Federal Express. You have to obey laws. We know we're all sinners."

Deutsch said he was personally offended.

"No. I'm sorry. It is not intended to be," she said. "I don't think you should take it that way, but that is what Christians consider themselves: perfected Jews. We believe the Old Testament. As you know from the Old Testament, God was constantly getting fed up with humans for not being able to live up to all the laws. What Christians believe — this is just a statement of what the New Testament is — is that that's why Christ came and died for our sins. Christians believe the Old Testament. You don't believe our testament."

Deutsch continued to call Coulter's comments anti-semetic.

"No, no, — I don't want you being offended by this," she responded. "This is what Christians consider themselves, because our testament is the continuation of your testament. You know that. So we think Jews go to heaven. I mean, [the late Rev. Jerry] Falwell himself said that, but you have to follow laws. Ours is "Christ died for our sins." We consider ourselves perfected Christians. For me to say that for you to become a Christian is to become a perfected Christian is not offensive at all."

Link (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/11/coulter-we-want-jews-to-be-perfected/#more-2471)

She makes me sick!:(

For me to say that for you to become a Christian is to become a perfected Christian is not offensive at all."It always cracks me up when the offender ges to define what is offensive!:lolhit:

"I don't think you should take it that way, but that is what Christians consider themselves: perfected Jews."Does this mean Muslims are perfected Christians?

Does this mean Muslims are perfected Christians?
According to Islam, both Jews and Christians got it almost right. The Jews' only mistake, supposedly, is thinking of themselves as God's chosen people. Christians made the mistake of, essentially, deifying the messenger. Muslims are very careful not to let anyone think of Mohammed as divine, because the only God is Allah.

I suppose Muslims think of themselves as "perfected Jews" more than "perfected Christians".

“They're Christian. They're tolerant. "

Link (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/11/coulter-we-want-jews-to-be-perfected/#more-2471)

I do agree that MOST christians are tolerant people (probably the most tolerant of ALL religions expect maybe Hindu -who knows..)

But they way she put it, is an oxymoron. Basically "if we we were ALL christians then we would be tolerant"

By the way, what is "perfected"?

But they way she put it, is an oxymoron. Basically "if we we were ALL christians then we would be tolerant"
Yeah. That is patently untrue. In fact, within 20 years of the legalization of Christianity (with the Edict of Milan), the Nicaean Creed was written, setting down the orthodox beliefs of "official" Christianity. That, of course, opened the door for Orthodox Christians to start persecuting other Christians (Gnostics, Arians, Monophysites, etc.), and persecute they did. Christians have continued to hate other Christians up to this day (think the split between Eastern and Western churches, the Protestant Reformation and the Counter-Reformation, persecution of Puritans, Baptists, Catholics, etc. depending upon who was in power at the time, and of course most recently the conflicts in Ireland between Catholics and Anglicans.)

My boyfriend's parents are Methodist and Episcopalian, and he says his grandparents didn't even want them to get married. They're both Christian, and both Protestant even... I don't see the point.

Christians have continued to hate other Christians up to this day

Correct.

As evidenced by Ms Coulter herself, it is a religion rife with hatred for "the other".

________________

Now to the root of the matter. The great unmentionable evil at the center of our culture is monotheism. From a barbaric Bronze Age text known as the Old Testament, three anti-human religions have evolved --Judaism, Christianity, Islam. These are sky-god religions. They are, literally, patriarchal --God is the omnipotent father-- hence the loathing of women for 2,000 years in those countries afflicted by the sky-god and his earthly male delegates. The sky-god is a jealous god, of course. He requires total obedience from everyone on earth, as he is in place not for just one tribe but for all creation. Those who would reject him must be converted or killed for their own good. Ultimately, totalitarianism is the only sort of politics that can truly serve the sky-god's purpose. Any movement of a liberal nature endangers his authority and that of his delegates on earth. One God, one King, one Pope, one master in the factory, one father-leader in the family home. ___________Gore Vidal