And anyone that thinks so is just a dolt!

You are eerily like her though. :D

No, you are not Warrior. You are SonofWarrior.

You are Warrior redux.

Come on, afinertouch5.

They don't actually think that you are *warrior*. It's just a bit of namecalling, to assuage their anger.

It's just that they're enraged to have questions like --""What is the penalty for working on the Sabbath? A)You will be stoned to death. B)Neither you nor your offspring to the 5th generation can enter the tabernacle. C)You should sacrifice two unblemished she goats. D)You will be disinherited from the kingdom?-- asked, because when the answer is brought to light, it only serves to expose the laughable absurdity of their irrational "belief" system.

THAT is why they piss and moan so.

They are angered, shamed and embarrassed all at the same time.

They are DEEPLY resentful of being put in the position of having to defend the words found in the absurd "Book" that their supposed "omnipotent creator" wrote.

Come on, afinertouch5.

They don't actually think that you are *warrior*. It's just a bit of namecalling, to assuage their anger.

It's just that they're enraged to have questions like --""What is the penalty for working on the Sabbath? A)You will be stoned to death. B)Neither you nor your offspring to the 5th generation can enter the tabernacle. C)You should sacrifice two unblemished she goats. D)You will be disinherited from the kingdom?-- asked, because when the answer is brought to light, it only serves to expose the laughable absurdity of their irrational "belief" system.

THAT is why they piss and moan so.

They are angered, shamed and embarrassed all at the same time.

They are DEEPLY resentful of being put in the position of having to defend the words found in the absurd "Book" that their supposed "omnipotent creator" wrote. Yes, it strikes me as very queer that they spend so much time on a debate forum and don't even try and debate usually they just attack you. They have nothing else except personal attacks. If they take things so personal they should not be on a debate forum. If they are not interested in the question or statement why do they even come into the thread?

Freethinker I do not think that's it.

As for afinertouch being warrior, I highly doubt it. But you are just as irritating. :thumbs:

Freethinker I do not think that's it.

As for afinertouch being warrior, I highly doubt it. But you are just as irritating. :thumbs: And your just another dolt!:upyours:

Yes, it strikes me as very queer that they spend so much time on a debate forum and don't even try and debate usually they just attack you. They have nothing else except personal attacks. If they take things so personal they should not be on a debate forum. If they are not interested in the question or statement why do they even come into the thread?

I bet a lot of things strike you as queer.

Damn, Inviolable, that's the second time this week you've made me laugh. You're on a roll, brotha!

I bet a lot of things strike you as queer. Well someone like you for sure!

And your just another dolt!:upyours:
Yeah, we're the ones who have a personal attack problem. :rolleyes:

Well someone like you for sure!

I would have to guess by adding the (!) at the end of that statement that you might be a little upset by what I said.

I dont see why, all I did was repeat what you said.
I may have added the words "a lot of things", which by comparison of this forum would be accurate.

Taking into consideration that so far, only 2 people have yet to completely dissagree with you.
I'd say a 98% average of disagreement is a lot of things to find odd.

However considering that I make up a percentage of the 98% disagreeing with you, I could see where your sentence was completely rational and unbias.
If not for the !

I would have to guess by adding the (!) at the end of that statement that you might be a little upset by what I said.

I dont see why, all I did was repeat what you said.
I may have added the words "a lot of things", which by comparison of this forum would be accurate.

Taking into consideration that so far, only 2 people have yet to completely dissagree with you.
I'd say a 98% average of disagreement is a lot of things to find odd.

However considering that I make up a percentage of the 98% disagreeing with you, I could see where your sentence was completely rational and unbias.
If not for the ! 98% did you take a survey?

98% did you take a survey?


No, I explained it in the post, so far I have seen 2 people who have not disagreed with you in the least.

Those 2 poeple would amount to 2% on average. Correct?
Which very plainly leaves 98%.

Which is odd, considering Napster is a self proclaimed hardcore atheist and I as a self proclaimed hardcore christian get along with him just fine.
I have to admit, that I dont often agree with Vile or Borghunter as well.
But somehow, we find a way to get along, even though I am a christian and they'er not. Our opinions often differ greatly, but we get along.

However, everyone I have mentioned including myself, well..
We just dont get along with you.
It's odd.

Very queer.

And your just another dolt!:upyours:


calling people a dolt isn't helping yourself

Come on, afinertouch5.

They don't actually think that you are *warrior*. It's just a bit of namecalling, to assuage their anger.

It's just that they're enraged to have questions like --""What is the penalty for working on the Sabbath? A)You will be stoned to death. B)Neither you nor your offspring to the 5th generation can enter the tabernacle. C)You should sacrifice two unblemished she goats. D)You will be disinherited from the kingdom?-- asked, because when the answer is brought to light, it only serves to expose the laughable absurdity of their irrational "belief" system.

THAT is why they piss and moan so.

They are angered, shamed and embarrassed all at the same time.

They are DEEPLY resentful of being put in the position of having to defend the words found in the absurd "Book" that their supposed "omnipotent creator" wrote.

Don't paint us all with the same brush there, FT.

Yes, it strikes me as very queer that they spend so much time on a debate forum and don't even try and debate usually they just attack you. They have nothing else except personal attacks. If they take things so personal they should not be on a debate forum. If they are not interested in the question or statement why do they even come into the thread?
It strikes me 'queer' that you post questions that aren't even debatable, then have the gall to piss and moan about there being no debate.

And I asked you a question about one of your questions and you never answered.

So how's that shoe tasting right about now?

You're british aren't ya? A bit of the ole hoof and mouth disease going on there, eh?

They are angered, shamed and embarrassed all at the same time.

They are DEEPLY resentful of being put in the position of having to defend the words found in the absurd "Book" that their supposed "omnipotent creator" wrote.


Thats funny, it sounds exactly like a creationist at the pulpit preaching.

And your just another dolt!:upyours:

Yeah, we're the ones who have a personal attack problem. :rolleyes:


calling people a dolt isn't helping yourself


Thank you DF and Michelle....

First, why was this thread posted in under Religion and Philosophy?

Afinertouch, I honestly think if you changed the way you "dicussed" religion here, mainly Christianity, you wouldn't have people calling you out on your posting style.


:upyours:

Right back at ya.

[quote=googs]Thank you DF and Michelle....

First, why was this thread posted in under Religion and Philosophy?

Afinertouch, I honestly think if you changed the way you "dicussed" religion here, mainly Christianity, you wouldn't have people calling you out on your posting style. In other words you feel that is ok for them to bash me for posting in a style that they don't like. Like the horrible biblical multiple choice quiz. They can attack me but when I attack back I'm the bad guy. Whatever!I have been attacked since my first post here. If people take things so personal they should not be on a debate forum. I have gone back and looked at several peoples postings and it seems like a lot of people just want to gripe about other peoples posting styles. Its a friggin debate forum and if people can't understand that it is not my problem.

I said posting because you're not discussing or debating. You're posting questions and awarding points to those who get it right. And when someone suggested you move it to the Games section, you got offended.

[quote=googs]Thank you DF and Michelle....

First, why was this thread posted in under Religion and Philosophy?

Afinertouch, I honestly think if you changed the way you "dicussed" religion here, mainly Christianity, you wouldn't have people calling you out on your posting style. In other words you feel that is ok for them to bash me for posting in a style that they don't like. Like the horrible biblical multiple choice quiz. They can attack me but when I attack back I'm the bad guy. Whatever!I have been attacked since my first post here. If people take things so personal they should not be on a debate forum. I have gone back and looked at several peoples postings and it seems like a lot of people just want to gripe about other peoples posting styles. Its a friggin debate forum and if people can't understand that it is not my problem.


why are you getting all bothered because it was suggested that your quizzes,or whatever they may be,get moved? And just how is my telling you that calling everyone a dolt isn't helping yourself "attacking" you?
If you want people to debate over a topic,you gotta give us something worthwhile to debate about. It's simple and easy,nothing to get your boxers in a bunch over,really:)

[quote=afinertouch5]


why are you getting all bothered because it was suggested that your quizzes,or whatever they may be,get moved? And just how is my telling you that calling everyone a dolt isn't helping yourself "attacking" you?
If you want people to debate over a topic,you gotta give us something worthwhile to debate about. It's simple and easy,nothing to get your boxers in a bunch over,really:) Yes mam!:spank:

Originally Posted by afinertouch5
98%? did you take a survey?

No, I explained it in the post, so far I have seen 2 people who have not disagreed with you in the least.

Those 2 people would amount to 2% on average. Correct?
Which very plainly leaves 98%.

LOL. Except that there are not 100 people participating in this thread, Einstein. Nowhere close to 100.

Your mathematical acuity is about on par with your rational thinking ability.....

LOL. Except that there are not 100 people participating in this thread, Einstein. Nowhere close to 100.

Your mathematical acuity is about on par with your rational thinking ability..... Thank goodness I don't thank I could handle that many people hating me!

LOL. Except that there are not 100 people participating in this thread, Einstein. Nowhere close to 100.

Your mathematical acuity is about on par with your rational thinking ability.....


You point that out in such a way because you like being an asshole or you just to stupid to understand how to explain yourself any other way?

Youre a bigot, a strieght up christian hating bigot, every post you make has strong overtones of a bigot and frankly I dont see why the mods allow you to post here. Its bullshit.

Im sure if every single post someone made bashed gays you wouldnt see any more then 3 post out of that person, but christian bashing asshole like FT are perfectly ok.
Im sure the only responce we'll see from FT out of this post will be to clearify my point and demonstrate exactly how much of a bigot he is.

I have been attacked since my first post here.

That fact should give you a clue that your posting style leaves something to be desired. The fact that so many posters find you insufferably annoying, a bigot, nasty, etc. should be your first hint that maybe you should change your posting style.

Hi guys.

I moved this hi-brow discussion (essentially a debate over the identity and posting-style of a forum member) to the Forum News forum.

Those wishing to discuss and debate religion, philosophy, theology, metaphysics, atheism, theism, agnosicism, synergizm, God, and/or the meaning of life, by all means continue to do so in the Religion and Philosophy forum.

Thanks, and have a nice day.


:hula:

That fact should give you a clue that your posting style leaves something to be desired. The fact that so many posters find you insufferably annoying, a bigot, nasty, etc. should be your first hint that maybe you should change your posting style. I could claim the same things about you but that really has nothing to do with debating or talking about the topic and you know it. And I'm pretty sure there are people on here that have the same opinion of you, so whatever frogger. Your certainly not fair and balanced now go read some Ann Coulter and bash the United States Airforce!

Hi guys.

I moved this hi-brow discussion (essentially a debate over the identity and posting-style of a forum member) to the Forum News forum.

Those wishing to discuss and debate religion, philosophy, theology, metaphysics, atheism, theism, agnosicism, synergizm, God, and/or the meaning of life, by all means continue to do so in the Religion and Philosophy forum.




:hula: But you still let Inviolable's post that have nothing at all to do with religion stay on the religious forum! Talk about biased! At least my topics dealt with religion and it showed how people in a debate can take a posting personal and start attacking the poster. Yet, when I say something back I'm the bad guy. What a sham!

I like how FT automatically brings religion into it right off the bat when half the people on this board are atheists.

It strikes me 'queer' that you post questions that aren't even debatable, then have the gall to piss and moan about there being no debate.

And I asked you a question about one of your questions and you never answered.

So how's that shoe tasting right about now?

You're british aren't ya? A bit of the ole hoof and mouth disease going on there, eh? No I'm not British. Born and raised in the USA. I'm sorry if I did not answer your question about one of my questions. If you would be so kind to ask again I will try and respond. I do think my questions are debatable and I have been called on it. Frogger certainly has.

I like how FT automatically brings religion into it right off the bat when half the people on this board are atheists. Well that was because my postings on the religious forum is what they are upset about! And how do you know that half the people on this board are atheists?

Well that was because my postings on the religious forum is what they are upset about! And how do you know that half the people on this board are atheists?


Because he has been here on these boards for more than a few weeks (and he is quite correct... I would say we have an excellent cross section of believers and non-believers). Half is about right, based on what I consider "regular" posters especially in the religious section.

You have two ears and one mouth for a reason... so you can listen twice as much as you speak.

Because he has been here on these boards for more than a few weeks (and he is quite correct... I would say we have an excellent cross section of believers and non-believers). Half is about right, based on what I consider "regular" posters especially in the religious section.

You have two ears and one mouth for a reason... so you can listen twice as much as you speak. I was just asking him how he knew that. You don't have to be a smartass about it! I would do a survey to see if that is the case but I would probably get chased out of Dodge!:eek:

No you wouldn't get "chased out" posting a poll like this...

a = Christian

b = Muslim

c = atheist

d = agnostic

e = spiritualist

f = other

What you may get "chased out" for would be a poll that would show your disdain for believers, like this...

a = mindless Christians

b = Muslim west-haters

c = brilliant free thinking atheists

d = agnostics (yawn)

e = confused spiritualists

f = people afraid of my rapier-wit insults.

Unfortunately, I would expect the latter poll from you.

Go ahead, be civil, prove me wrong.

:D

"bang bang, i am the warrior."

"bang bang, i am the warrior." Well you could have saved me a bunch of trouble if you had only admitted it earlier! :lolhit:

Well you could have saved me a bunch of trouble if you had only admitted it earlier! :lolhit:

i'm not that warrior!

i'm not that warrior! Dammit:mad:

I miss Mad Dog. He was great for discussion in the Religion forum. :(

I miss mad dog too. He cut thru all the crap and told it like it was.

PS I have no problem with afinertouch and don't think he's warrior. I've never taken his polls simply because I'm no biblical scholar and wouldn't want to show myself up for the ignorant dolt that I am. Besides, he has his views, which aren't mine, nor are mine his, I guess, but who the hell cares. Not me. Remember none of us gets out of here alive.

now on THAT happy thought......

I miss mad dog too. He cut thru all the crap and told it like it was.

PS I have no problem with afinertouch and don't think he's warrior. I've never taken his polls simply because I'm no biblical scholar and wouldn't want to show myself up for the ignorant dolt that I am. Besides, he has his views, which aren't mine, nor are mine his, I guess, but who the hell cares. Not me. Remember none of us gets out of here alive.

now on THAT happy thought...... Well your correct that I'm not warrior. And I don't really think some of the people that say that even believe it. I may be wrong. I don't even know who warrior is! Before my time. And by the way, those were not polls I posted it was a biblical quiz. I thought multiple choice would be more fun. Maybe I should have just posted the bible verse and ask what does this mean to you.:)

But you still let Inviolable's post that have nothing at all to do with religion stay on the religious forum! Talk about biased! At least my topics dealt with religion and it showed how people in a debate can take a posting personal and start attacking the poster. Yet, when I say something back I'm the bad guy. What a sham!

My goodness, I didn't call you a bad guy.
I simply moved a thread that had more to do with forum news (your feeling put upon and accused of being Warrior1972, a prolific and argumentative troll from just a few months ago), and moved it to forum news.

And to be fair, I just noticed Inviolable's biting and acerbic thread on 'will a question be asked in this thread?', and moved it to chat central.

Please lighten up. You let people get under your skin at the least provocation, and you are, in my professional opinion, a bit overly defensive and combative.

This really is a fun place to post, visit, and chat, if you can just let down your armor. Really, lighten up. OK?

OK, let’s all start over as friends!!

:woohoo:

My goodness, I didn't call you a bad guy.
I simply moved a thread that had more to do with forum news (your feeling put upon and accused of being Warrior1972, a prolific and argumentative troll from just a few months ago), and moved it to forum news.

And to be fair, I just noticed Inviolable's biting and acerbic thread on 'will a question be asked in this thread?', and moved it to chat central.

Please lighten up. You let people get under your skin at the least provocation, and you are, in my professional opinion, a bit overly defensive and combative.

This really is a fun place to post, visit, and chat, if you can just let down your armor. Really, lighten up. OK?

OK, let’s all start over as friends!!

:woohoo::flowers: