Freethinker
06-25-2007, 06:52 PM
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=21&ItemID=13122
The New York Times: The lynchpin of the supposedly "Liberal Media"; in reality, the leading outlet of State Propaganda
Propaganda & Manipulation
Edward Bernays, The Father of Spin, was remarkably candid about his manipulative intent.
“If we understand the mechanisms and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing it,” he argued in Propaganda, one of his first books.
In a later book, he coined the term “engineering of consent” to describe his technique for controlling the masses.
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society,” Bernays argued.
“Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
"In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons.
"They understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.”
Dictionaries define "yellow journalism" variously as irresponsible and sensationalist reporting that distorts, exaggerates or misstates the truth.
It's misinformation or agitprop disinformation masquerading as fact to boost circulation and readership or serve a larger purpose like lying for state and corporate interests.
The dominant US Media excel in it, producing a daily diet of fiction portrayed as real news and information in their role as our national thought-control police gatekeepers.
In the lead among the print and electronic corporate-controlled media is the New York Times publishing "All The News That's Fit To Print" by its standards.
Others wanting real journalism won't find it on their pages allowing only the fake kind.
It's because this paper's primary mission is to be the lead instrument of state propaganda making it the closest thing we have in the country to an official ministry of information and propaganda.
Single handedly, the Times destroys "The Myth of the Liberal Media" that's also the title of Edward Herman's 1999 book on "the illiberal media," the market system, and what passes for democracy in America - what Michael Parenti calls "Democracy For the Few," in his book with that title out earlier this year in its 8th edition.
In his book, Herman writes about the "propaganda model" he and Noam Chomsky introduced and developed 11 years earlier in their landmark book titled "Manufacturing Consent."
They explained how the dominant media use this technique to program the public mind to go along with whatever agenda best serves wealth and power interests.
So imperial wars of aggression are portrayed as liberating ones, humanitarian intervention, and spreading democracy to nations without any.
Never mind they're really for new markets, resources like oil, and cheap exploitable labor paid for with public tax dollars diverted from essential social needs.
In "The Myth of the Liberal Media," Herman explains the "propaganda model" focuses on "the inequality of wealth and power" and how those with most of it can "filter out the news to print, marginalize dissent (and assure) government and dominant private interests" control the message and get it to the public.
It's done through a set of "filters" removing what's to be suppressed and "leaving only the cleansed (acceptable) residue fit to print" or broadcast electronically.
Parenti's "Democracy For the Few" is democracy-US style the rest of us are stuck with.
Books have been written on how, going back decades, the New York Times betrayed the public trust serving elitist interests alone.
It plays the lead and most influential media role disseminating state and corporate propaganda to the nation and world.
In terms of media clout, the NY Times is unmatched with its prominent front page being what media critic Norman Solomon calls "the most valuable square inches of media real estate in the USA" - more accurately, anywhere.
Examples of Times duplicity are endless showing up every day on its pages. The shameless Judith Miller saga is just the latest episode of how bad they can get, but she had her predecessors, and the beat goes on since she left in disgrace.
Through the years, the Times never met a US war of aggression it didn't love and support.
It was never bothered by CIA's functioning as a global Mafia-style hit squad/training headquarters ousting democratically elected governments, assassinating foreign heads of state and key officials.
Propping up friendly dictators, funding and training secret paramilitary armies and death squads, and now snatching individuals for "extraordinary rendition" to torture-prison hellholes, some run by the agency and all taking orders from it.
The CIA, as Chalmers Johnson notes, is a state within a state functioning as the president's unaccountable private army with unchecked powers and a near-limitless off-the-books secret budget we now know tops $44 billion annually.
It menaces democratic rule, threatens the Republic's survival and makes any notion of a free society impossible as long as this agency exists. Not a problem at New York Times.
It worked closely with CIA since the 1950s allowing some of its foreign correspondents to be Agency assets or agents. It no doubt still does.
The Times is also unbothered by social decay at home, an unprecedented wealth disparity, an administration mocking the rule of law, a de facto one party state with two wings and a president usurping "unitary executive" powers claiming the law is what he says it is making him a dictator.
It practically reveres the cesspool of corrupted incestuous ties between government and business, mocking any notion of democracy of, for, or by the people.
That's the state of the nation's "liberal media" headquartered in the Times building in New York.__________________Stephen Lendman
The New York Times: The lynchpin of the supposedly "Liberal Media"; in reality, the leading outlet of State Propaganda
Propaganda & Manipulation
Edward Bernays, The Father of Spin, was remarkably candid about his manipulative intent.
“If we understand the mechanisms and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing it,” he argued in Propaganda, one of his first books.
In a later book, he coined the term “engineering of consent” to describe his technique for controlling the masses.
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society,” Bernays argued.
“Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
"In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons.
"They understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.”
Dictionaries define "yellow journalism" variously as irresponsible and sensationalist reporting that distorts, exaggerates or misstates the truth.
It's misinformation or agitprop disinformation masquerading as fact to boost circulation and readership or serve a larger purpose like lying for state and corporate interests.
The dominant US Media excel in it, producing a daily diet of fiction portrayed as real news and information in their role as our national thought-control police gatekeepers.
In the lead among the print and electronic corporate-controlled media is the New York Times publishing "All The News That's Fit To Print" by its standards.
Others wanting real journalism won't find it on their pages allowing only the fake kind.
It's because this paper's primary mission is to be the lead instrument of state propaganda making it the closest thing we have in the country to an official ministry of information and propaganda.
Single handedly, the Times destroys "The Myth of the Liberal Media" that's also the title of Edward Herman's 1999 book on "the illiberal media," the market system, and what passes for democracy in America - what Michael Parenti calls "Democracy For the Few," in his book with that title out earlier this year in its 8th edition.
In his book, Herman writes about the "propaganda model" he and Noam Chomsky introduced and developed 11 years earlier in their landmark book titled "Manufacturing Consent."
They explained how the dominant media use this technique to program the public mind to go along with whatever agenda best serves wealth and power interests.
So imperial wars of aggression are portrayed as liberating ones, humanitarian intervention, and spreading democracy to nations without any.
Never mind they're really for new markets, resources like oil, and cheap exploitable labor paid for with public tax dollars diverted from essential social needs.
In "The Myth of the Liberal Media," Herman explains the "propaganda model" focuses on "the inequality of wealth and power" and how those with most of it can "filter out the news to print, marginalize dissent (and assure) government and dominant private interests" control the message and get it to the public.
It's done through a set of "filters" removing what's to be suppressed and "leaving only the cleansed (acceptable) residue fit to print" or broadcast electronically.
Parenti's "Democracy For the Few" is democracy-US style the rest of us are stuck with.
Books have been written on how, going back decades, the New York Times betrayed the public trust serving elitist interests alone.
It plays the lead and most influential media role disseminating state and corporate propaganda to the nation and world.
In terms of media clout, the NY Times is unmatched with its prominent front page being what media critic Norman Solomon calls "the most valuable square inches of media real estate in the USA" - more accurately, anywhere.
Examples of Times duplicity are endless showing up every day on its pages. The shameless Judith Miller saga is just the latest episode of how bad they can get, but she had her predecessors, and the beat goes on since she left in disgrace.
Through the years, the Times never met a US war of aggression it didn't love and support.
It was never bothered by CIA's functioning as a global Mafia-style hit squad/training headquarters ousting democratically elected governments, assassinating foreign heads of state and key officials.
Propping up friendly dictators, funding and training secret paramilitary armies and death squads, and now snatching individuals for "extraordinary rendition" to torture-prison hellholes, some run by the agency and all taking orders from it.
The CIA, as Chalmers Johnson notes, is a state within a state functioning as the president's unaccountable private army with unchecked powers and a near-limitless off-the-books secret budget we now know tops $44 billion annually.
It menaces democratic rule, threatens the Republic's survival and makes any notion of a free society impossible as long as this agency exists. Not a problem at New York Times.
It worked closely with CIA since the 1950s allowing some of its foreign correspondents to be Agency assets or agents. It no doubt still does.
The Times is also unbothered by social decay at home, an unprecedented wealth disparity, an administration mocking the rule of law, a de facto one party state with two wings and a president usurping "unitary executive" powers claiming the law is what he says it is making him a dictator.
It practically reveres the cesspool of corrupted incestuous ties between government and business, mocking any notion of democracy of, for, or by the people.
That's the state of the nation's "liberal media" headquartered in the Times building in New York.__________________Stephen Lendman