PDA

View Full Version : Terrorism up 25 percent!


warrior1972
05-01-2007, 05:50 PM
YES we are winning the war on terrorism!!!

WASHINGTON - Terrorist attacks worldwide shot up more than 25 percent last year, killing 40 percent more people than in 2005, particularly in Iraq where extremists used chemical weapons and suicide bombers to target crowds, the State Department said Monday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Among countries, Iran remains the biggest supporter of terrorism, with elements of its government backing groups throughout the Middle East, notably in Iraq, giving material aid and guidance to Shiite insurgent groups that have attacked Sunnis, U.S. and Iraqi forces, it said.

In its annual global survey of terrorism, the department said 14,338 attacks took place in 2006, mainly in Iraq and Afghanistan, 3,185 more than in 2005 representing a 28.5 percent increase.

These strikes claimed a total of 20,498 lives, 13,340 of them in Iraq, 5,800 more, or a 40.2 percent increase, than last year, it said.

Despite the grim figures, State Department officials pointed to some successes in the war on terror, including improved counterterrorism cooperation with various nations and the thwarting of numerous plots, notably plans to down trans-Atlantic airliners.

"Serious challenges do remain, there's no question about that," said acting counterterrorism coordinator Frank Urbancic. "This is not the kind of war where you can measure success with conventional numbers. We cannot aspire to a single decisive battle that will break the enemy's back, nor can we hope for a signed peace accord to mark victory."

The report partly attributes the higher casualty figures to a 25 percent jump in the number of nonvehicular suicide bombings targeting large crowds. That overwhelmed a 12 percent dip in suicide attacks involving vehicles.

In Iraq, the use of chemical weapons, seen for the first time in a Nov. 23, 2006, attack in Sadr City, also "signaled a dangerous strategic shift in tactics," it said.

With the rise in fatalities, the number of injuries from terrorist attacks also rose, by 54 percent, between 2005 and 2006, and the number of wounded doubled in Iraq over the period, according to the department's Country Reports on Terrorism 2006.

The numbers were compiled by the National Counterterrorism Center and refer to deaths and injuries sustained by "noncombatants," with significant increases in attacks targeting children, educators and journalists.

"By far the largest number of reported terrorist incidents occurred in the Near East and South Asia," said the 335-page report, referring to the regions where Iraq and Afghanistan are located.

"These two regions also were the locations for 90 percent of all the 290 high-casualty attacks that killed 10 or more people," it said.

The report said 6,600, or 45 percent, of the attacks took place in Iraq, killing about 13,000 people, or 65 percent of the worldwide total of terrorist-related deaths in 2006. Kidnappings by terrorists soared 300 percent in Iraq over 2005.

Afghanistan had 749 strikes in 2006, a 50 percent rise from 2005 when 491 attacks were tallied, according to the report.

However, it also detailed a surge in Africa, where 65 percent more attacks, 420 compared to 253 in 2005, were counted last year, largely due to turmoil in or near Sudan, including Darfur, and Nigeria where oil facilities and workers have been targeted.

As in previous years, the 2006 report identified Iran as the "most active state sponsor" of terror, accusing the Islamic republic of helping plan and foment attacks to destabilize Iraq and derail Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts.

Iran's Revolutionary Guard has been "linked to armor-piercing explosives that resulted in the deaths of coalition forces" and has helped, along with Lebanon's radical Hezbollah movement, train Iraqi extremists to build bombs, the report said.

Although the designation of Iran is not new, it appears in the report that is being released as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice prepares to attend a conference of Iraq's neighbors, at which she has not ruled out a meeting with Iran's foreign minister.

The report said that terrorists continue to rely mainly on conventional weapons in their attacks, but noted no let up in an alarming trend toward more sophisticated and better planned and coordinated strikes.

For instance, while the number of bombings increased by 30 percent between 2005 and 2006, the death tolls from these incidents rose by 39 percent and the number of injuries rose by 45 percent, it said.

The report attributed the higher casualty figures to a 25 percent jump in the number of non-vehicular suicide bombings targeting large crowds that more than made up for a slight 12 percent dip in suicide attacks involving vehicles.

Of the 58,000 people killed or wounded in terrorist attacks around the world in 2006, more than 50 percent were Muslims, the report, says with government officials, police and security guards accounting for a large proportion, the report said.

The number of child casualties from terrorist attacks soared by more than 80 percent between 2005 and 2006 to more than 1,800, while incidents involving educators were up more than 45 percent and those involving journalists up 20 percent, the report said.

Twenty-eight U.S. citizens were killed and 27 wounded in terrorist incidents in 2006, most of them in Iraq, where eight of the 12 Americans kidnapped by terrorists last year were taken captive, it said.

Napsterbater
05-01-2007, 06:11 PM
You must've skipped with glee once this news story dropped.

mikezila
05-01-2007, 06:19 PM
You must've skipped with glee once this news story dropped.
message board terrorists are like that.

warrior1972
05-01-2007, 06:34 PM
there you go again. I said nothing to you and boom a personal attack. You just can't help yourselve can you? It is like a mental illness?

Napsterbater
05-01-2007, 06:40 PM
You know, if you were to ever post anything intelligent, I think AllForums would collectively shit a brick.

warrior1972
05-01-2007, 06:42 PM
same with you. I mean personally all you can do is make personal attacks. You never post anything worth while on here. You are a full time troll.

DarkFantasy96
05-01-2007, 06:44 PM
Now that is not true Warrior. Napster does occasionally get serious, especially in the Religion & Philosophy forum.

He is quite mean though. I'd just ignore him if I were you since you seem pretty sensitive.

Napsterbater
05-01-2007, 06:45 PM
same with you. I mean personally all you can do is make personal attacks. You never post anything worth while on here. You are a full time troll.
You're the full time troll, I make maybe three posts a day, when I'm not feeling like force-feeding truth down an idiot's throat. You make thirty.

warrior1972
05-01-2007, 06:47 PM
Trolling is like when you are attacking people for not reason dumbass! I don't do that. I post about topics and news and mind my own fucking business and then you come along and make pot shots at me. THAT IS TROLLING!

Napsterbater
05-01-2007, 06:48 PM
The troll says what? You are the troll, because you more closely resemble one.

paulc
05-03-2007, 02:37 AM
This statement is a bit hypocritical,dosent mention anything about 'state sponsered terrorism'.
One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter.
Its a difficult word for everyone to agree on.

warrior1972
05-03-2007, 02:49 AM
Well either way violence is up 25 percent from any kind of terrorism or freedom fighters.

we sure showed them a thing or two!!

paulc
05-03-2007, 02:51 AM
OK 72,
lets hear it.

warrior1972
05-03-2007, 03:18 AM
Well Bush said we were winning the war on terror and that fighting the terrorist in Iraq would make the world safer...but in fact it has put the world at greater risk.
I am not saying pull out our troops or anything just saying that violence creates more violence is all.
Personally I get all the civilians out let the terrorist have Iraq let them celebrate for a day and then drop a nuke on thier heads.

paulc
05-03-2007, 03:27 AM
Hmmm,to be honest,at times it scares me just how easy Americans joke/or not on the use of nuclear weapons,anyway.
President Bush and the war on terror,if youve read round the boards youll know I have been against the Iraq thing from the start.
Your right about it making the world a more dangerous place,especially for Americans,tho any westerners are targets.
The Administration lost trackof its objectives,it had AQ in its sights in Afghanistan,then turned its attention to Iraq.

mikezila
05-03-2007, 03:45 AM
Hmmm,to be honest,at times it scares me just how easy Americans joke/or not on the use of nuclear weapons,anyway.
President Bush and the war on terror,if youve read round the boards youll know I have been against the Iraq thing from the start.
Your right about it making the world a more dangerous place,especially for Americans,tho any westerners are targets.
The Administration lost trackof its objectives,it had AQ in its sights in Afghanistan,then turned its attention to Iraq.
hey, we invented them, and only used them for their intended purpose twice.

paulc
05-03-2007, 04:23 AM
I thought ex Nazis invented them,but there ya go.
Yes,you guys have your own wee club,the only people to use these evil weapons,congrats.

mikezila
05-03-2007, 04:38 AM
I thought ex Nazis invented them,but there ya go.
Yes,you guys have your own wee club,the only people to use these evil weapons,congrats.
hopefully we will be the last to have used them...but only time will tell.

and it was the ex-Nazis that invented our space program...we couldn't have gotten to the moon without them:thumbs:

between us and the Soviets, we got the better Nazis.

paulc
05-03-2007, 04:41 AM
America got the scientists, Russia got, Eastern Europe,dosent seem fair.

Phyrex
05-03-2007, 04:52 AM
and it was the ex-Nazis that invented our space program...we couldn't have gotten to the moon without them:thumbs:


Hooray for Von Braun.

paulc
05-03-2007, 04:55 AM
Didnt von Braun invent the v2 which destroyed parts of London and Antwerp.
'Also made a pretty good razor''!!!!!!!!!!

Sparky2
05-03-2007, 05:05 AM
In its annual global survey of terrorism, the department said 14,338 attacks took place in 2006, mainly in Iraq and Afghanistan, 3,185 more than in 2005 representing a 28.5 percent increase. These strikes claimed a total of 20,498 lives, 13,340 of them in Iraq, 5,800 more, or a 40.2 percent increase, than last year, it said.

These facts are at odds with the spirit of the headline, and certainly aren't worth gloating over. Iraq and Afghanistan have become the battleground in the war on terror, and have therefore become the magnet for every suicidal, misguided son of Islam.

Here's an analogy for you, warrior goddess.
Let's say there were 25 reported church fires around the world last year.
And approximately that same number each year in recent history.
If I was a nut-job, and took it upon myself to round up a small group of like-minded nut-jobs & started systematically burning down churches every night in a southern three-state region, there's a good chance that we could burn down 75 churches in a year or so.
NOW:
What would be the more appropriate news headline?
"Serial church arsonists still at large in the South, law enforcement officials stymied" ?
or
"Church fires up dramatically world-wide, church goers world-wide concerned" ?

Who chose to put a spin on the original terrorism headline, and to what end?


Despite the grim figures, State Department officials pointed to some successes in the war on terror, including improved counterterrorism cooperation with various nations and the thwarting of numerous plots, notably plans to down trans-Atlantic airliners.


Ah, now who stuck that bit of good news in there?
Some editor must've slipped up somewhere.
:rolleyes:

es347fan
05-04-2007, 05:42 AM
Isn't releasing this report now merely another avenue of garnering support for continuing the war on terror?

Vilepagan
05-04-2007, 06:38 AM
You know, if you were to ever post anything intelligent, I think AllForums would collectively shit a brick.

Napster, if you don't like her posts, put her on ignore. Following her around and harrassing her isn't the way to go.

Napsterbater
05-04-2007, 06:59 AM
Warrior posts too much for me to be "following her around." Instead, I like to take the most egregious offenders, like this particular thread, and say something Brooks or Trav might.