PDA

View Full Version : Imus Didn't call Black Pepublicans Moronic


gmsisko1
04-30-2007, 09:26 AM
At Least Don Imus Didn't Call Black Republicans 'Moronic'

Don Imus's slip of the lip created a media and racial outrage. He immediately acknowledged his mistake and apologized in person to the Rutgers women basketball team members. They accepted his apology with dignity and class.

John Sugg is Senior Editor of Creative Loafing, a limited distribution weekly paper based in Atlanta, Georgia. Sugg did not have a slip of the pen or a runaway keyboard when he referred to me and all black Republicans as moronic. Sugg wrote, "Being a black Republican is not only oxymoronic, it's simply plain old-fashioned moronic." In the same article he also referred to me as a "sorry opportunist" and a "token," because I chose to run as a Republican in the Georgia 2004 U.S. Senate primary election.

I ran as a Republican not because I am an opportunist, but because my political views are conservative.

I consider Sugg's references to me and all black people insulting and ignorant. Mr. Sugg clearly exposes one of the main intellectual deficiencies of liberals. In the absence of facts or sound logic to defend their ideological opinions, they use name calling and racial slurs to discourage others from venturing off the Democratic plantation.

I am not looking for an apology from Mr. Sugg. And make no mistake about it, I do not need or want any of the race hustlers speaking for me and stirring the racial outrage. Millions of other black people like me are thinking and speaking for themselves.

What I would like to know from Mr. Sugg is how he arrived at such a choice of words for me and other black Republicans. Maybe he chose to ignore my academic credentials. Maybe my professional accomplishments during my business career were just moronic luck. Or, maybe my impressive second place finish in the 2004 Georgia Republican primary was a political fluke. Or just maybe the 172,000 people who voted for me did not know the color of my eyes, and that, according to Mr. Sugg, I was a moron, sorry opportunist and token.

Oh, and about the characterization of me as a token. Set aside for a moment Sugg's abject racism in using that word. I would assume a "token" would already be elected to office, with the blessing and support of the political establishment. In my case, nothing could be further from the truth. The Georgia Republican Party did not ask me to run for the Senate nomination. Nor did I ask the state party for permission. I was not even the establishment's choice. And when the race was over, where was the Georgia Republican Party? On the phone, asking me to help raise money for Republican candidates. Some token.

Ignorance is defined as the lack of knowledge of something or someone. Although the politically sensitive police discourage the use of the word ignorant in public forums, there are times when the watered down version, uninformed, is just not accurate enough. You make the call.

The bottom line is that liberal Democrats like Mr. Sugg can not deal with facts or solutions to issues, nor can they deal with honest and informed debate. So they resort to name calling. When that tactic does not work to further their cause, they resort to a disjointed and unrelated emotional tirade.

To paraphrase an old saying, "sticks and stones may break my bones, but don't mess with my money." Liberal Democrats have stolen money from taxpayers for decades with dysfunctional social programs, and they continue to steal black votes with factual deception and attempted verbal intimidation.

During the early half of the 1900s, Democrats discouraged black people from voting for Republicans with physical intimidation, including lynches by the Ku Klux Klan, a Democrat-inspired organization. Today, instead of a rope and a tree, Democrats try to deny black people from voting or running for office as Republicans using a keyboard and racially inspired media moments.

Name calling and emotional tirades will not help racial relations in this country. Poisonous partisan politics will not help solve the big issues we face. Many of those in elected office are in denial that the biggest problems even exist. Worse, perpetuating a divided nation under the guise of political differences of opinion will not help our fight against our biggest national security threat, Islamic fascism.

All persons in all aspects of media have a responsibility to inform and inspire people to make better decisions and better choices. When we make better choices we have better lives and a better nation.

Slips, slants and slurs may endure for a while, but I believe there is a great awakening underway. Ignorance is not bliss forever.

April 23, 2007
By Herman Cain

Decka
04-30-2007, 08:55 PM
It's obvious.. the media doesn't give two shits about this because there is NO union that fights against black people dishing out racism. They are always the victim, and the media sucks off Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton even though they are to be trusted as much as Don King... the bias is obvious, black people can have a field day on "racial slurs".. but white people are closely monitored. This process is racism by it's definition... certain colored people can say things while other people cannot.

dharmabum
04-30-2007, 08:57 PM
there is NO union that fights against black people dishing out racism

So start one.

Decka
04-30-2007, 08:59 PM
Why fight bias, bigotry, and racism with more of the same shit? Why can't we just eliminate the "black-power", Jackson-Sharpton regime and hold everyone to the same standards?

I refuse to drop to that level.

dharmabum
04-30-2007, 09:03 PM
Why fight bias, bigotry, and racism with more of the same shit?

Nobody says you have to be racist in order to fight racism from others.

Apparently you don't think you can do it without being a racist. That is too bad.

Decka
04-30-2007, 09:04 PM
Nobody says you have to be racist in order to fight racism from others.

Apparently you don't think you can do it without being a racist. That is too bad.

Oh i could fight it, but i surely wouldn't be front page news, setting the standards.

If you do the right thing, you aren't news.

dharmabum
04-30-2007, 09:06 PM
Oh i could fight it, but i surely wouldn't be front page news, setting the standards.

If you do the right thing, you aren't news.

I don't agree with that at all.
Martin Luther King Jr. did it very successfully.

Decka
04-30-2007, 09:14 PM
he lived in a very different society and era...

dharmabum
04-30-2007, 09:26 PM
he lived in a very different society and era...

Not all that different, but point taken.

sedan
04-30-2007, 09:38 PM
It's obvious.. the media doesn't give two shits about this because there is NO union that fights against black people dishing out racism. They are always the victim, and the media sucks off Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton even though they are to be trusted as much as Don King... the bias is obvious, black people can have a field day on "racial slurs".. but white people are closely monitored. This process is racism by it's definition... certain colored people can say things while other people cannot.Umm, Sugg is white. Cain is black.

Freethinker
04-30-2007, 10:41 PM
At Least Don Imus Didn't Call Black Republicans 'Moronic'

John Sugg....did not have a slip of the pen or a runaway keyboard when he referred to me and all black Republicans as moronic.

This is all such a tempest in a teacup......but at least it gives loony rightwing dipshits like Cain something else to whine about.

(Not that I am surprised at Cain demonstrating such sanctimony and ignorance, given the sort of nonsense I have heard from him prior to this.)

Sugg simply said -- "Being a black Republican is not only oxymoronic, it's simply plain old-fashioned moronic."

THEN, in his criticism of Sugg, Heman Cain does essentially the same thing; Cain said -- "" Mr. Sugg clearly exposes one of the main intellectual deficiencies of liberals. ""

No, come to think of it, what Cain did is worse.

Contrary to what some idiots would try to suggest, Sugg did not call any person a "moron".

He opined that it is moronic for a black person to be a Republican. I would think that any rational individual on the planet --which evidently leaves out Herman Cain-- would understand what Sugg was getting at

Cain, OTOH, lambastes liberals and emphatically states that they have *intellectual deficiencies*.

I fail to see how Mr. Cain can whine about what John Sugg said, and in the next sentence do the same thing (only worse) that he is excoriating Sugg for having done.

Jester
04-30-2007, 11:05 PM
the bias is obvious, black people can have a field day on "racial slurs".. but white people are closely monitored. This process is racism by it's definition... certain colored people can say things while other people cannot.Looking at high-profile cases involving semi-famous people may lead one to that conclusion. Everyday life, however, tells a completely different story.

Decka
04-30-2007, 11:56 PM
Looking at high-profile cases involving semi-famous people may lead one to that conclusion. Everyday life, however, tells a completely different story.

Probably different in different areas...

all i know is that if you are gonna say "black words".. you better "act black" around where i live... or else you just another "cracka" who got his ass kicked LMAO

Jester
05-01-2007, 12:08 AM
Probably different in different areas...

all i know is that if you are gonna say "black words".. you better "act black" around where i live... or else you just another "cracka" who got his ass kicked LMAOSince you're white yourself, you've likely never faced racism from white people. Perhaps that leads you to believe that it's less prevalent than it actually is. I, however, can assure you that it's as abundant as racism from black people.

Evakian
05-01-2007, 05:44 AM
Since you're white yourself, you've likely never faced racism from white people. Perhaps that leads you to believe that it's less prevalent than it actually is. I, however, can assure you that it's as abundant as racism from black people.
If I may ask, how do you define this racism?

Frogger
05-01-2007, 06:39 AM
So start one.

As someone who seems quick to take up the cause of one race when he sees it as possibly being attacked why don't you start one? I guess you don't mind if it is a white ox being gored and get upset only when it is a black ox being gored.

dharmabum
05-01-2007, 03:26 PM
As someone who seems quick to take up the cause of one race when he sees it as possibly being attacked why don't you start one?

Because Decka was the one complaining about the lack, not I.

I guess you don't mind if it is a white ox being gored and get upset only when it is a black ox being gored.

You really need to stop trying to "guess" what I "seem" like. You are making yourself look silly.

Jester
05-01-2007, 10:10 PM
If I may ask, how do you define this racism?It ranges from making racist comments behind someone's back to aggravated assault and murder. In other words, outright hatred and/or discrimination, rather than just the double standard that Decka describes.

Decka
05-02-2007, 12:17 AM
I never said racism doesn't happen from whites to blacks.. it's just that THAT happens to be the only way racism is reported.. white on black, and many examples are iffy at best. Black on white racism doesn't exist as far as the media is concerned.

DarkFantasy96
05-02-2007, 07:39 AM
It's funny how in the title of this thread is says "Pepublicans" and if you pronounce it like "Republicans" it's... PEE-publicans.

::giggle::