Under Articles of War and Military conduct,
Article 4 & 5 state implicitly NOT to Cooperate with
the Enemy.Giving only Name,Rank & serial #.
I think Article 6 emphasizes being a Patriot.
No wonder Dimocrats don't get it.
The only * So Be It * in their vernacular is when they get
caught in a nutter Lie.Which is the only apparent reason
for their being.
Bee 4 Real.Stand up for the Military Code of Conduct when
taken prisoner.
Even if The New Democrats have caught yer attention.

Under Articles of War and Military conduct,
Article 4 & 5 state implicitly NOT to Cooperate with
the Enemy.Giving only Name,Rank & serial #.
I think Article 6 emphasizes being a Patriot.
No wonder Dimocrats don't get it.
The only * So Be It * in their vernacular is when they get
caught in a nutter Lie.Which is the only apparent reason
for their being.
Bee 4 Real.Stand up for the Military Code of Conduct when
taken prisoner.
Even if The New Democrats have caught yer attention.

331-202-1049
Articles 1-5 of the Code of Conduct

Article 1 states "I am an American, fighting in the forces, which guard my country and our way of life. I am prepared to give my life in their defence."

Article 2 states "I will never surrender of my own free will. If in command, I will never surrender the members of my command while they still have the means to resist."

Article 3 states "If I am captured, I will continue to resist by all means available. I will make every effort to escape and aid others to escape. I will except neither parole nor special favors from the enemy."

Article 4 states "If I become a prisoner of war, I will keep faith with my fellow prisoners. I will give no information or take part in any action which might be harmful to my comrades. If I am senior, I will take command. If not, I will obey the lawful orders of those appointed over me and will back them up in every way."

Article 5 states "When questioned, should I become a prisoner of war, I am required to give name, rank, service number (SSN), and date of birth. I will evade answering further questions to the utmost of my ability. I will make no oral or written statements disloyal to my country and its allies or harmful to their cause.

Article 6 states "I will never forget that I am an American, fighting for freedom, responsible for my actions, and dedicated to the principles which made my country free. I will trust in my God, and in the United States of America."

I copied them right out of my soldier manual. There are plenty of Democrats in the Military, im sure they would follow this code as much as any Republican.

331-202-1049
Articles 1-5 of the Code of Conduct

Article 1 states "I am an American, fighting in the forces, which guard my country and our way of life. I am prepared to give my life in their defence."

Article 2 states "I will never surrender of my own free will. If in command, I will never surrender the members of my command while they still have the means to resist."

Article 3 states "If I am captured, I will continue to resist by all means available. I will make every effort to escape and aid others to escape. I will except neither parole nor special favors from the enemy."

Article 4 states "If I become a prisoner of war, I will keep faith with my fellow prisoners. I will give no information or take part in any action which might be harmful to my comrades. If I am senior, I will take command. If not, I will obey the lawful orders of those appointed over me and will back them up in every way."

Article 5 states "When questioned, should I become a prisoner of war, I am required to give name, rank, service number (SSN), and date of birth. I will evade answering further questions to the utmost of my ability. I will make no oral or written statements disloyal to my country and its allies or harmful to their cause.

Article 6 states "I will never forget that I am an American, fighting for freedom, responsible for my actions, and dedicated to the principles which made my country free. I will trust in my God, and in the United States of America."

I copied them right out of my soldier manual. There are plenty of Democrats in the Military, im sure they would follow this code as much as any Republican.

I doubt there are many Democrats in the Military.
On account Al Gore going to so mush trouble in the 2000 Florida Recount
Fiasco and his steely determination to disfranchise those Military
Oversea's Ballots,w/o postage dates.
He knew full well,that Most {high degree} of Military Ballots were
being recorded as republican votes.
-----------------------------------------------------------
If Voltaire were alive today,he'd make the common Democrat look like
a fly on the wall.
" Any one who has the power to make you believe absurdities has
the power to make you commit injustices ."
-- Voltaire

I doubt there are many Democrats in the Military.
On account Al Gore going to so mush trouble in the 2000 Florida Recount
Fiasco and his steely determination to disfranchise those Military
Oversea's Ballots,w/o postage dates.
He knew full well,that Most {high degree} of Military Ballots were
being recorded as republican votes.
-----------------------------------------------------------
If Voltaire were alive today,he'd make the common Democrat look like
a fly on the wall.
" Any one who has the power to make you believe absurdities has
the power to make you commit injustices ."
-- Voltaire

Your doubts are unfounded. Trust me, there are many many Democrats in the military, many in my unit.

Your doubts are unfounded. Trust me, there are many many Democrats in the military, many in my unit.

It may appear that way.But it's - Against ALL Odds - is all.
Find a Battalion who wood prefer to Salute John Kerry.
Or even want Billy Bob Clinton to visit their base.
I tell ya...it's an anomaly,at best.

I doubt there are many Democrats in the Military.


There are obvioulsy six too many letters at the end of your screen name.

Alot of them salute Bush again after he turns around.

I bet you can't find them doing that for Clinton.

Hillary wants the US Marines to serve her at her dinner outings.


It may appear that way.But it's - Against ALL Odds - is all.
Find a Battalion who wood prefer to Salute John Kerry.
Or even want Billy Bob Clinton to visit their base.
I tell ya...it's an anomaly,at best.

There are obvioulsy six too many letters at the end of your screen name.

Thankx for the Free Thought.
Whats yer fee for real profundity.?
Charges per letter,or gross weight of thought.

Whats yer fee for real profundity?


It's free..........but useless to fools anyway. They cannot grasp it.

Under Articles of War and Military conduct,
Article 4 & 5 state implicitly NOT to Cooperate with
the Enemy.Giving only Name,Rank & serial #.
I think Article 6 emphasizes being a Patriot.
No wonder Dimocrats don't get it.
The only * So Be It * in their vernacular is when they get
caught in a nutter Lie.Which is the only apparent reason
for their being.
Bee 4 Real.Stand up for the Military Code of Conduct when
taken prisoner.
Even if The New Democrats have caught yer attention.

Learn to speak English. If this isn't your second language then you have no excuse for sounding like a retard. Koutaka speaks better English than you and he's from Japan!

Learn to speak English. If this isn't your second language then you have no excuse for sounding like a retard. Koutaka speaks better English than you and he's from Japan!

Oh ! I get it.You Want { mores like Demand} Uniformity of
the written word.All syntax to appear as if Goebbles personally
sanctioned it's worth and expediency,heading off to the printers.
Do you have even a modicum of vunerability within conscience,that
you mite rightly,er wrongly,make muck of free thought & expression.
I doubt you and Ezra Pound wood see eye to eye.
Or even Papa Hemmingway.Let alone Gertrude Stein.
In point of fact,Maybe Andy Warhola would find a special corner
in the Factory,fer yer type.
That being,those blinded by such tin foil simplicity,as to see and
acknowledge,only what glitters and shines,to their streaming conscience
of constipation,worth it's weight in sheer shit-faced schlock.

Ralph Peters did a story on the Royal Marines that did roll over and did whatever the Iranians wanted. They told the world that the British government was bad and they were trespassers and whatever. Then they went and shook Ahmandinejad's hand before preparing to depart.

Needless to say, the Iranians wrung all the propaganda good out of the Royal Marines and they don't want to directly lock horns with the British yet, so they'll now go free.

Dammit.

Bee 4 Real.Stand up for the Military Code of Conduct when
taken prisoner.
Even if The New Democrats have caught yer attention.
Theres democrats in England?

Oh ! I get it.You Want { mores like Demand} Uniformity of
the written word.All syntax to appear as if Goebbles personally
sanctioned it's worth and expediency,heading off to the printers.
Do you have even a modicum of vunerability within conscience,that
you mite rightly,er wrongly,make muck of free thought & expression.
I doubt you and Ezra Pound wood see eye to eye.
Or even Papa Hemmingway.Let alone Gertrude Stein.
In point of fact,Maybe Andy Warhola would find a special corner
in the Factory,fer yer type.
That being,those blinded by such tin foil simplicity,as to see and
acknowledge,only what glitters and shines,to their streaming conscience
of constipation,worth it's weight in sheer shit-faced schlock.

You are writing in a forum. A debate forum mind you. Generally the purpose of a message is for others to understand what you are saying, and for your message to not get misconstrued. Believe it or not, the English written language is comprehensible to others because we all agree to the definitions of words and the grammar with which they go together. Without agreement on those, one might as well be writing to them self. You apparently are adhering to some grammar (spaces for example) and you grasp the definition of most words, but be it purposely or accidentally you make your messages only semi-incoherent.

Look at this sentence for example;
"All syntax to appear as if Goebbles personally
sanctioned it's worth and expediency,heading off to the printers."
Since I'm calling you out on your grammar, I would like to see you write like a nazi? Sorry, but it makes absolutely no sense.

Foolsworth,

I believe that the other posters are admonishing you to drop the odd, beat-poet style of writing that you have affected, and simply write in plain English.

Your postings have shown none of the classic markers of dyslexia, so your strange and defiant allegiance to this style of prose would indicate that it is either an affectation, a sign of some sort of mental illness, or a rare and debilitating learning disability.

My suspicion is that this is all a non-conformist act, and that you simply reject the conventional rules of grammar, syntax, and punctuation as a overt rejection of the stale conventions of society.

I don't agree with Dr. Roy Lisker's politics, but he once wrote an insightful statement that might apply to your posture:

"Although adjustment and learning are not co-extensive, they are clearly closely related . The notion of adaptation covers both of them: if learning involves understanding , (itself a highly complex process) , so adjustment involves habituation , the gradual adjustment whereby something considered alien or strange becomes acceptable, even familiar."

Please, Foolsworth. Adapt to our strange, alien style of writing.
That way we can at least understand what the hell you are trying to say.
And then we can all be friends.
:flowers:

You are writing in a forum. A debate forum mind you. Generally the purpose of a message is for others to understand what you are saying, and for your message to not get misconstrued. Believe it or not, the English written language is comprehensible to others because we all agree to the definitions of words and the grammar with which they go together. Without agreement on those, one might as well be writing to them self. You apparently are adhering to some grammar (spaces for example) and you grasp the definition of most words, but be it purposely or accidentally you make your messages only semi-incoherent.

Look at this sentence for example;

Since I'm calling you out on your grammar, I would like to see you write like a nazi? Sorry, but it makes absolutely no sense.

You're calling me out on me grammar,not because you've Ben summoned
to lead the grammar police squad,but exclusively to usher in a
flawed character trait,that you posess,unflinchingly.You are a typical
Liberal elitist,like Ward Churchill,who feel unassumingly compelled to
extoll their point of view as The Most Sound and Proper.
Yer a Petulant Prig of Puke proportions... Plural.