The Dude
03-22-2007, 01:14 AM
Better quality of a movie than i thought it would be seeing its from 2005 (Alot of newer movies blow)
I give it a 3.5 out of 5 i guess :)
Not too much graphics and pretty intense all thru!!
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0399201
Evakian
03-22-2007, 04:48 AM
Better quality of a movie than i thought it would be seeing its from 2005 (Alot of newer movies blow)
I give it a 3.5 out of 5 i guess :)
Not too much graphics and pretty intense all thru!!
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0399201
A lot of movies regardless of time, more than just "a lot" actually, are of poor quality. The worst filmmaking we've ever had was about the time Frogger was a young man and saw crappy films for a quarter so he could get a bag of popcorn, a soda, and a newspaper with his double feature (maybe a belt as well). Older movies are, on the whole, worse than movies we have today, by many respects.
muad_dib
03-22-2007, 02:13 PM
I like that movie as well. I've never really had the opinion of Michael Bay that it seems to be popular to have.