http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17551129/

Why in the Hell would you report this to the police?

“I am a good person. I am sick of these low-lifes stealing my things,” the woman told a police communications officer.

Hmmm.... this is why.. haa

Oh my the elevator doesn't go all that way to the top.. To much weed.
Gives new meaning to dumb ass

Oh my the elevator doesn't go all that way to the top.. To much weed.
Gives new meaning to dumb ass
:confused:did sombody steal your weed?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17551129/

Why in the Hell would you report this to the police?


Reminds me of an episode of "Reno 911"


"Never underestimate stupid"

It's kinda cute how the police decided no action would be taken against the gardener. Gardener?? More like 'illegal pot grower'.

“I am a good person. I am sick of these low-lifes stealing my things,”If this was true she wouldnt be doing weed!

Why attach a moral value to the idea of somebody growing their own recreational intoxicant? Might you harbor the same feelings if that person were brewing moonshine in the woods? Marijuana is something that grows naturally, needs virtually no processing and has not been proven to harm anyone that uses it.

There is no shortage of documentation regarding the harmful effects of alcohol use and abuse. One could fill a shopping mall with the books, clinical and medical records of those folks and entire societies over the centuries that have been harmed, sickened or completely destroyed by alcohol use and abuse.

Does the same exist for marijuana? Not in the least, for one reason that the U.S. government adheres to laws formed under racist stereotypical beliefs from the 1930's and earlier deeming marijuana to be the "devil's weed". Despite repeated acknowledgment from a wide variety of sources regarding the benefits of cannibis for a multitude of medical issues, the U.S. government, and others will not even examine the product.

The "war on drugs" has acompished little or nothing, despite freight cars full of money thrown at it. The DEA is more of a money pit than the IRS. Various groups scream about military spending, yet pay scant attention to what the "law enforcement" types are wasting money on.

Why attach a moral value to the idea of somebody growing their own recreational intoxicant? Might you harbor the same feelings if that person were brewing moonshine in the woods? Marijuana is something that grows naturally, needs virtually no processing and has not been proven to harm anyone that uses it.

There is no shortage of documentation regarding the harmful effects of alcohol use and abuse. One could fill a shopping mall with the books, clinical and medical records of those folks and entire societies over the centuries that have been harmed, sickened or completely destroyed by alcohol use and abuse.

Does the same exist for marijuana? Not in the least, for one reason that the U.S. government adheres to laws formed under racist stereotypical beliefs from the 1930's and earlier deeming marijuana to be the "devil's weed". Despite repeated acknowledgment from a wide variety of sources regarding the benefits of cannibis for a multitude of medical issues, the U.S. government, and others will not even examine the product.

The "war on drugs" has acompished little or nothing, despite freight cars full of money thrown at it. The DEA is more of a money pit than the IRS. Various groups scream about military spending, yet pay scant attention to what the "law enforcement" types are wasting money on.

Couldn't agree with you more Fan. It's absurd to watch the tobacco companies cramming all that money into their pockets while killing everyone in their paths....so to speak.

Alcohol and tobacco kill more people each year than all the other "illegal drugs" put together, yet no one seems too damned concerned to take another look at outlawing them. WHY? Because of the MONEY involved and the pockets that the money goes into!!!

Any of you ever look up the definition of nicotine in the dictionary?? I have!

Alcohol and tobacco kill more people each year than all the other "illegal drugs" put together, yet no one seems too damned concerned to take another look at outlawing them. WHY? Because of the MONEY involved and the pockets that the money goes into!!!
I am damned concerned, and have been for a long time. I wish both were illegal. Drunk people and second-hand smoke disgusts me.

The woman is a stoner and stoners are not known for their ability to reason.

The woman is a stoner and stoners are not known for their ability to reason.

Sez you

I am damned concerned, and have been for a long time. I wish both were illegal. Drunk people and second-hand smoke disgusts me.
I wish it were illegal to smell bad, or to be fat, or to be old, or to be sick. Those conditions disgust me.

Seriously, I hope I'm mistaken here. Do you really suggest outlawing something because you don't like it?

Seriously, I hope I'm mistaken here. Do you really suggest outlawing something because you don't like it?
They should be outlawed because of all the deaths they both cause, all the innocent people that's affected by second-hand smoke, and all the innocent people that's been killed by drunk drivers. That's enough to override any disgust that I feel. My disgust is only a tip of the iceberg, and I'm not alone at being disgusted.

They should be outlawed because of all the deaths they both cause, all the innocent people that's affected by second-hand smoke, and all the innocent people that's been killed by drunk drivers. That's enough to override any disgust that I feel. My disgust is only a tip of the iceberg, and I'm not alone at being disgusted.
A) You shouldn't prohibit something because it's in someone's best interests to. If that were true, McDonald's should be illegal.

B) If you're affected by secondhand smoke, avoid it.

C) Drunk driving is already illegal. Why make alcohol possession illegal? Like that would work anyway; remember Prohibition?

Sez you
Well, you've admitted you smoke and we all know how wonderful and reasonable your mind is.

"You shouldn't prohibit something because it's in someone's best interests to. If that were true, McDonald's should be illegal."

Two wrongs don't make a right--i.e., that is an argument for banning McDonalds. The problem is that society has an interest in people not getting sick and ending up dependent on others and draining the economy. Therefore there is always a case to be made for prohibiting harmful stuff.

Good sense, however, and experience, tells us that harmfulness is not the only consideration. Harmful drugs are outlawed, but this creates an opportunity for criminals to organize and get wealthy. It is a stupid response. Doing this to alcohol has a similar effect, and so would doing it to tobacco.

So a policy somewhere between prohibition and complete freedom is called for--restrictions and maybe special taxes (being careful to not set them so high as to promote bootlegging).

If you're affected by secondhand smoke, avoid it.

This is not always possible; there are irresponsible parents who expose their children and the workplace use to be a real problem and still is for some. In my experience cigarette smokers insisting on their "right" to smoke are among the rudest and self-centered people in existence.

I wish someone would have stolen my weed way back in 1978! Then I wouldn't have been arrested and hauled off to jail for 24 hours:slap: 2.5 lbs almost got me 3 years:@@: Never, ever again did I do something that dumb :rolleyes: Sitting in a holding cell with Bertha Butt and her sidekick was enough of a lesson for me:eek:

There was a time when I crossed the Tex - Mex border in a mid-1970's Chevy Blazer, with a very dead sea turtle strapped to the roof, carrying enough compressed bricks of the finest Mexican plantation grown stuff to get me & my buddy an entire wing in a fed prision all to ourselves, yet we skated right on through without even a cursory glance inside the truck but only at our military credentials ... those were the days....

Well, you've admitted you smoke and we all know how wonderful and reasonable your mind is.
Lighten up Evak
es is one of the most logical, level headed posters on this board.

*toke* wanna hit?

There was a time when I crossed the Tex - Mex border in a mid-1970's Chevy Blazer, with a very dead sea turtle strapped to the roof, carrying enough compressed bricks of the finest Mexican plantation grown stuff to get me & my buddy an entire wing in a fed prison all to ourselves, yet we skated right on through without even a cursory glance inside the truck but only at our military credentials ... those were the days....

You blow me away, this is logical and acceptable no matter how illegal it is and you are proud yet you can't see someones sexual preference as some thing that is also acceptable. Hummmm
Wow what a double edge logic...Better smoke another joint might help clear your mind.

Lighten up Evak
es is one of the most logical, level headed posters on this board.
He clearly isn't if he smuggled drugs into the country in mass quantities, and then told us about it.

He clearly isn't if he smuggled drugs into the country in mass quantities, and then told us about it.
so this would be a bad time to bring up the truck load of Puerto Ricans i smuggled from Miami to NYC?

so this would be a bad time to bring up the truck load of Puerto Ricans i smuggled from Miami to NYC?
That's fine, NYC needs more taco trucks.

they have cheerleader types working in food service now?! the labor market must be tighter than i thought:confused:

BTW-you think i should have told them that they didn't have to worry about INS?