I just caught the end of THIS (http://inside.c-spanarchives.org:8080/cspan/cspan.csp?command=dprogram&record=551043495)*** (earlier, this morning)....and, you can as WELL (http://inside.c-spanarchives.org:8080/cspan/schedule.csp) (10:30am/EST).....and, it highlights why Hillary is the Only Choice, when considering Presidential Candidates! (*** The Q&A was Classic-Clinton!)

Hell....she's already puttin' The Old Team (http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-hillary31dec31,0,282955.story?page=3&coll=la-home-headlines) together.....and, after another Bush-debacle.....it wouldn't exactly be a mistake, reliving the Past (http://clinton5.nara.gov/WH/Accomplishments/eightyears-01.html)!!

WHATEVER IT TAKES, TO PUT BILL CLINTON BACK-IN-THE-WHITEHOUSE (http://www.kellysite.net/taxes.html)!!!! :woohoo:

(Can you imagine The Idiot Son....presently in The Oval Office....pullin'-this-off (http://www.themercury.com/news/article.aspx?articleId=d9d80fa9fea446da90916977c64 3253d)??? :rolleyes: )

"Last edited by Mr. Shaman : Today at 07:00 AM."

You wouldn't have to edit every post if you didn't have at least 4 links in every post.

But, what brings you to grace us with your presence again?

Holy crap, Shammy's back...

Welcome back I think :D

hahaha, well welcome back Shaman. It's been quite awhile since I've seen so much ...pizaz.. on one post.

Welcome back and screw clinton...

I looked at all those links, they were pretty much just propeganda.

I looked at all those links, they were pretty much just propeganda.
you couldn't tell that by the content of the technicolor post?

But, what brings you to grace us with your presence again?
Ah, you know.....just wonderin' what's goin'-on in the "old-neighborhood".

It appears to be improving....not such an overload of radical-Rightists. :banana:

I guess my time, here, wasn't wasted!! :woohoo:

Holy crap, Shammy's back...

Welcome back I think :D
Everthing's temporary........despite all those Absolutes the Rightwingers are tryin' to sell everyone. :rolleyes:

I guess my time, here, wasn't wasted!! :woohoo:
It's my doing, asshole. Quit trying to steal my delusions from me.

hahaha, well welcome back Shaman. It's been quite awhile since I've seen so much ...pizaz.. on one post.
It's a gift! :D

I looked at all those links, they were pretty much just propeganda.
Too many big-words, huh?

Ya' must be the (typical) Red-Stater. :rolleyes:

*

http://www.drbukk.com/images9/cebina.jpg

Welcome back and screw clinton...
Still the big Porky Limbaugh fan, are ya'?? :rolleyes:

*

https://home.comcast.net/~treehousehero/trash6.jpg

I was thinking these forums were going downhill. This pretty much confirms it.

I was thinking these forums were going downhill. This pretty much confirms it.
;)

I was thinking these forums were going downhill. This pretty much confirms it.
Tch, you're just out of sorts because he wrote a colourful post. :D

I guess my time, here, wasn't wasted!! :woohoo:

nope, just everyone elses who had to read your posts.

Still the big Porky Limbaugh fan, are ya'?? :rolleyes:
Shaman, only you can cut through the B.S. and see the real Guerilla.
Great analysis.

"A deep, talented field in the Democratic caucus race offers both good and difficult choices.

No fewer than three candidates would, by their very identity, usher the nation to the doorstep of history. Should the party offer the nation the chance to choose its first woman president? Or its first black president? Or its first Latino president?

Beyond their personal appeal, the candidates have outlined ambitious policy proposals on health care, education and rural policy. Yet these proposals do little to help separate the field. Their plans are similar, reflecting a growing consensus in the party about how to approach priority issues.

The choice, then, comes down to preparedness: Who is best prepared to confront the enormous challenges the nation faces — from ending the Iraq war to shoring up America’s middle class to confronting global climate change?

The job requires a president who not only understands the changes needed to move the country forward but also possesses the discipline and skill to navigate the reality of the resistant Washington power structure to get things done.

That candidate is New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (http://desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071215/NEWS/71215018). :thumbs:

From working for children’s rights as a young lawyer, to meeting with leaders around the world as first lady, to emerging as an effective legislator in her service as a senator, every stage of her life has prepared her for the presidency."

"Who says newspaper endorsements (http://www.kansascity.com/news/politics/story/406869.html) don’t matter?

The candidates who don’t get them, that’s who.

A spokesman for Sen. Hillary Clinton said Sunday that the campaign is “extremely pleased” to land TheDes Moines Register’s nod (http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/endorsements/), which was announced in its Sunday editions.

“We believe as president,” the newspaper’s editorial staff wrote, “she’ll do what she’s always done in her life: throw herself into the job and work hard.”

Pimping for hrc. Sounds like she's got more than a few problems these days. From criminal fundraisers to low blow campaign chairmen and now it turns out that billy has money invested in offshore funds that avoid taxation. Billy's the boy and hrc is just the one to get it done.:banana:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aGwhTXxfCSHo&refer=home

Pimping for hrc. Sounds like she's got more than a few problems these days. From criminal fundraisers to low blow campaign chairmen and now it turns out that billy has money invested in offshore funds that avoid taxation. Billy's the boy and hrc is just the one to get it done.:banana:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aGwhTXxfCSHo&refer=home


You think that the Bush family has not invested in overseas funds? I am not saying it is right or wrong. When you buy a mutual fund, you don't always know where and what they are investing in.

This is similar to when the right wing propoganda machine was saying "George Soros bet against the Dollar! He is anti-American!". (you could hear that one on every right wing media tool). When infact there are tens of thousand of currency traders in the US that either bet for or against the dollar on a day-to-day basis and make money on the currency rate fluctuations!

Well at least we aren't the BLUE-STATERS Shaman;)
http://www.barbarabuckland.com/mainwebsite_html/homeless%20man.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/1/1002665_0addeada3f_m.jpg

You think that the Bush family has not invested in overseas funds? I am not saying it is right or wrong. When you buy a mutual fund, you don't always know where and what they are investing in.

This is similar to when the right wing propoganda machine was saying "George Soros bet against the Dollar! He is anti-American!". (you could hear that one on every right wing media tool). When infact there are tens of thousand of currency traders in the US that either bet for or against the dollar on a day-to-day basis and make money on the currency rate fluctuations!

which has got nothing to do with whether hrc is electable or not.

She's gone from double digit leads in three states to virtual ties or now trails. And this crap on top makes it more difficult.

Well at least we aren't the BLUE-STATERS Shaman ;)
That's pretty obvious....by your ride. :rolleyes:


http://www.assumption.edu/ahc/1920s/Eugenics/unsignedKansasKKKpainting20.jpg

Pimping for hrc. Sounds like she's got more than a few problems these days. From criminal fundraisers to low blow campaign chairmen.....

How ironic it is for a B*sh worshiper to mention "low blow campaign chairmen" as being a reason to not support a candidate.

In the history of the world, there has probably never been a person more **low blow** than Karl Rove.

How ironic it is for a B*sh worshiper to mention "low blow campaign chairmen" as being a reason to not support a candidate.

In the history of the world, there has probably never been a person more **low blow** than Karl Rove.

I didn't say it wasn't a reason that she shouldn't be supported. Others apparently think that it is a reason that she shouldn't be. What does free think?

which has got nothing to do with whether hrc is electable or not.

huh? you brought it up.

That's pretty obvious....by your ride. :rolleyes:



Oh please... you're the one who started this whole labeling, stereotyping thing... by the way, found a picture of ya, at least I get outside every once in a while ;)

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/161/436552796_4f8c7963ce.jpg