And you wonder why I consider you a rightwinger. :rolleyes:
I'm not a rightwinger,I just thought that was hilarious. I haven't been paying attention to this thread, so from what he said I was under the impression that the article had come out after her cover was blown. So I was misled. I apologize sincerely. :( I hope I didn't hurt anyone's feelings.

Oh yeah and was the article written before her cover was blown? Would it still have come out if her status hadn't been revealed?

And certain sheeple on here are eating his lies up like candy.
I hope you're not referring to me. I certainly know that she was covert, with all the evidence that's been provided.

Oh yeah and was the article written before her cover was blown? Would it still have come out if her status hadn't been revealed?

Brooks and co. has been trying to claim that Plame was not covert because her picture appeared in a magazine. I asked them what issue and when it came out but none of them could answer me.

The fact that they identify her as a CIA operative in the article is a clear sign it was after her cover was already blown.

Brooks doesn't seem to get that.

Brooks and co. has been trying to claim that Plame was not covert because her picture appeared in a magazine. I asked them what issue and when it came out but none of them could answer me.

The fact that they identify her as a CIA operative in the article is a clear sign it was after her cover was already blown.

Brooks doesn't seem to get that.
Why is it that no one is able to pinpoint the date the article came out? We've established, I assume, that there actually was an article, so it really can't be that difficult.

Why is it that no one is able to pinpoint the date the article came out? We've established, I assume, that there actually was an article, so it really can't be that difficult.

It doesn't matter either way, since we know for a fact that Plame was covert.

The Director of the CIA said so.

Brooks is just beating a dead horse.

He is still patheticly trying to claim Plame was not covert dispite all the facts saying otherwise. Namely?

I couldn't find any of those facts in the article that simply portrayed her as the wife of an ambassador....hahahahaha

Brooks and co. has been trying to claim that Plame was not covert because her picture appeared in a magazine. For the past several years, Val would drive her kids to daycare and then proceed in her family's auto, registered to her address, to CIA Headquarters.
Everyday. Same route. Same routine.

So the, presumably, billions we spend on protecting our covert officers can be completely undone by someone sitting outside CIA headquarters with a fifty dollar digital camera?

Yeah, she was covert.

Yeah, she was covert.

Yes, we all know that. Congratulations on finally catching up. :rolleyes:

Yes, we all know that. Congratulations on finally catching up. :rolleyes:Very clever. Sure beats posting facts.

Yeah, yeah, "I'm not a lawyer Plame" said she was covert.
Good one Val.

It doesn't matter either way, since we know for a fact that Plame was covert.

The Director of the CIA said so.

Brooks is just beating a dead horse.

Say,thar Superman! I done tink yuz gots yer little uniform
aired too tight.Like,just let out some air and Breathe Reality.
Even The Fitz {special prosecutor Fitzgerald} is unwilling
to Publically associate the Name Plame and Covert.
You surely have some Liberal balls,to assume the position.
Well,not exactly,butts close enough.

And you wonder why I consider you a rightwinger. :rolleyes:
compared to you, Ralph Nader is a right-winger.

Very clever.

Nope. Just a statement of fact.

Valerie Plame was covert.

Sure beats posting facts.

Been there, done that.
Obviously Facts mean nothing to you anyway.


Yeah, yeah, "I'm not a lawyer Plame" said she was covert.

Yeah, so did the Director of the CIA.

but don't let reality get in the way of your hyper-partisan denial. :rolleyes:

compared to you, Ralph Nader is a right-winger.

and compared to you Ghengis Khan was a liberal. :rolleyes:

and compared to you Ghengis Khan was a liberal. :rolleyes:
but i'm taller...and my Empire isn't over-extended.:)

but i'm taller...and my Empire isn't over-extended.:)

Colin Powell - American Military Over-Extended. (http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006%5C12%5C19%5Cstory_19-12-2006_pg1_4)

:matrix:

Colin Powell - American Military Over-Extended. (http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006%5C12%5C19%5Cstory_19-12-2006_pg1_4)

:matrix:
my Empire:rolleyes:

my Empire:rolleyes:

You mean this one? (http://www.freedonia.org/)

dharmabum.

Give it a rest already, will you?

You are repeating yourself, you are making gross spelling and grammatical errors, and you have become the house inside joke.

Take a few days off, will you?
It's well over a year before the elections you're trying to influence.
Have a vacation, brother.

We'll all still be here when you get back.

you have become the house inside joke.

This coming from a house inside joke... :rolleyes:


Take a few days off, will you?

Just did.

It's well over a year before the elections you're trying to influence.

I am flattered that you think I have that much influence. :rolleyes:


Have a vacation, brother.

Just did.

Now I am back. :)

I have a better idea. You don't want to read my posts? Don't.

Problem solved.

You're welcome! :)

You mean this one? (http://www.freedonia.org/)
not yet.....let me gather my horde

we ride at dawn!
:bike:

Politics is a popularity contest, little brother dharma-and-greg-bum.

Want to measure mine against yours (on this web-forum anyway)?

You are a humorless agitator.
I am a humorous fellow, and notoriously well-liked. Am apolitical and disarming. All at the same time.

You are highly political, and severely polarizing. All at the same time.

Want to engage in a pissing contest?
(Better be ready to get some on you, buddy-boy.)

You are a humorless agitator.
I am a humorous fellow, and notoriously well-liked. Am apolitical and disarming. All at the same time.

You are highly political, and severely polarizing. All at the same time.

.... in a nutshell.

you are making gross spelling and grammatical errors,
I haven't noticed this, but then, my eyes tend to glaze over whenever I see his posts.

You are a humorless agitator.

You must have been looking in a mirror when you wrote that.

There is a new thing called "discussion". You should try it sometime.

Want to engage in a pissing contest?

That is Brooks' area of expertise.

.... in a nutshell.

Case in point... pissing contests...

Ha ha ha ha haaaa!!

Outstanding, and very well then.
And so off to bed with me.
(I am quite old, after all, and I need my beauty rest.)

Carry on the good fight little brother.
I have a feeling it's going to be a long and fruitless discussion ahead of you.
But then again, that may well be what flips your switch.

See you on the morrow.
;)

Carry on the good fight little brother.


I shall, Grumpy2. :)

That is Brooks' area of expertise.Now this is the second time tonight you've brought up my name in response to someone else's post.

Is this one of those man-crush things. It's getting really creepy.

Now this is the second time tonight you've brought up my name in response to someone else's post.


Way to prove me right about pissing contests. :rolleyes:

Way to prove me right about pissing contests. :rolleyes:Not to beat a dead horse, but how does your bringing me up in threads I'm not a part of, reinforce your notion that I engage in pissing contests.

I'm not saying you and I don't do that, but how does that example make your case?

I'm not saying you and I don't do that,

Thanks for admitting you do that.

I admit I have been goaded into it by you and others on numerous occasions.

Have a nice night.