What they said was fifty times worse than what Ann Coulter said.
"Obviously they're not the same but why is one worse?" -Brooks

I will post this with no comment.

http://humor.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://slate.msn.com/id/2108216/slideshow/2108085/entry/2108087/speed/100

or

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AE847UXu3Q


Fastidious, isn't he?

That's so gay.

Faggot is a terrible word that should never be used or uttered except in the case of fundraising.
Gimme a break John.

"We must show that inflaming prejudice to attack progressive leaders will only backfire.
Can you help us raise $100,000 in "Coulter Cash" this week to keep this campaign charging ahead and fight back against the politics of bigotry?"
https://johnedwards.com/action/contribute/coulter

My biggest beef with Edwards is the fact he's put the video on his website. "HEY LOOK EVERYONE, SOMEONE CALLED ME A FAGGOT!"

I guess he has to milk it for all it's worth.

Wow, after seeing that youtube video, I'd say Coulter hit the nail on the head. God, people hate brutal honesty, but then again, there's a time and a place for employing a modicum of tact, and exercising the 'when and where' apparently isn't Coulters strong suit. As for Ann, you can call her butch all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that she's better looking than any female the left has to offer.

Although Helen Thomas is a real looker, I'll give you that...

Cant agree with Ann Coulter here, the word she should of used was, dick.

That's not as good as "faggot". I mean, think about what she said, and the venue in which she chose to say it, and you can't help but laugh. I'm sorry, but that's some funny shit, right there...

Highly inappropriate? Check.

Caustic? Check.

Completely devoid of tact? Check.

Funny? Double Check.

I have to say that bitch cracks me up. Have you ever read her column? If you have any sense of humor, whatsoever, then you'll laugh at her brand of humor. She does have a wit about her...

Cant agree with Ann Coulter here, the word she should of used was, dick.

Different word, different meaning. Use of "dick" would not have had the impact Coulter was looking for.

Yea, Ann was playing to the crowd, just like John plays to the electorate. I noticed he was voted 'sexiest politican in the world' 2000, by people mag, so he did win something.

Yea, Ann was playing to the crowd, just like John plays to the electorate. I noticed he was voted 'sexiest politican in the world' 2000, by people mag, so he did win something.

People mag? That's as reliable and noteworthy as any other rag [/sarcasm]

Yea, are they're editor must be fucking blind too.

Edwards tells FOX to stuff it ... ROTFLMAO

http://politicalinsider.com/2007/03/edwards_rejects_nevada_debate.html

That's 2 dem -- Obama and Edwards that have marginalized FOX news. If the dems are smart (which sometimes I admit they aren't) they would all boycott the FOX Coultergeist crew of christo-fascist, corporate puppets.

Although Helen Thomas is a real looker, I'll give you that...
I thought Ann Coulter's comment was funny, but this one beats that one like a ravenous elephant trampling a retarded drooling donkey.

So?
So if you're calling a married man a faggot, you may not mean gay.

Edwards tells FOX to stuff it ... ROTFLMAO

http://politicalinsider.com/2007/03/edwards_rejects_nevada_debate.html

That's 2 dem -- Obama and Edwards that have marginalized FOX news. If the dems are smart (which sometimes I admit they aren't) they would all boycott the FOX Coultergeist crew of christo-fascist, corporate puppets.

Amen Brother!
They shouldn't treat Fox as if they are legitimate media.

So if you're calling a married man a faggot, you may not mean gay.
Do you think that makes the comments inoffensive or inappropriate?

"Obviously they're not the same but why is one worse?" -Brooks
Coulter: Faggot

Edwards' Blogger: One thing I vow here and now–you mother___kers who want to ban birth control will never sleep. I will f__k without making children day in and out and you will know it and you won’t be able to stop it. Toss and turn, you mean, jealous motherfu__ers. I’m not going to be “punished” with babies. Which makes all your efforts a failure. Some non-procreating women escaped. So give up now. You’ll never catch all of us. Give up now.

That's why one is worse.
There are more examples you can Google.

Coulter: Faggot

Edwards' Blogger: One thing I vow here and now–you mother___kers who want to ban birth control will never sleep. I will f__k without making children day in and out and you will know it and you won’t be able to stop it. Toss and turn, you mean, jealous motherfu__ers. I’m not going to be “punished” with babies. Which makes all your efforts a failure. Some non-procreating women escaped. So give up now. You’ll never catch all of us. Give up now.

That's why one is worse.
There are more examples you can Google.
Show me these examples, your first one failed miserably at showing me how the blogger's comments were worse than calling a politician a faggot in a professional, videotaped setting.

Coulter: Faggot

Is that all you think she said? No wonder you don't get it.

That's not as good as "faggot". I mean, think about what she said, and the venue in which she chose to say it, and you can't help but laugh. I'm sorry, but that's some funny shit, right there...

Highly inappropriate? Check.

Caustic? Check.

Completely devoid of tact? Check.

Funny? Double Check.

I have to say that bitch cracks me up. Have you ever read her column? If you have any sense of humor, whatsoever, then you'll laugh at her brand of humor. She does have a wit about her...

She must tuck it in under her nuts.

Do you think that makes the comments inoffensive or inappropriate?I don't think it's offensive unless John is defensive about the public's perception of him, in which case he'd be offended.
If Keith Olbermann called President Bush a faggot, people would say, "huh?".
When it's said about Edwards people mumble in hushed tones and say "hey, be nice".

It is inappropriate though.

Is that all you think she said? No wonder you don't get it.You're right. There was another context here. She made another on target observation that if you say faggot you have to go into re-hab. That's a great statement about celebrities trying to save their careers (Michael Richards and Mel Gibson).
Everyone forgot this one though, and it was a pretty good point.

Other than that and faggot, what did I miss?

Other than that and faggot, what did I miss?

I could go on and on about what escapes you, but I really don't feel like wasting the time on a hostile audience.

Other than that and faggot, what did I miss?

Oh, I don't know... perhaps the fact that Ms. Coulter is seemingly obsessed with homosexuality?

You are aware, aren't you, that in the past Coulter has offered to put “even money on Hillary coming out of the closet,” said Bill Clinton shows “some level of latent homosexuality,” and called Vice President Al Gore a “total fag."

You have to wonder why she's so focused on the sexual orientation of various Democratic leaders/politicians....

:rolleyes:

You have to wonder why she's so focused on the sexual orientation of various Democratic leaders/politicians....

:rolleyes:

Well, she is 45 and still single... ;)

I could go on and on about what escapes you, but I really don't feel like wasting the time on a hostile audience.Oh no you don't.
You said, "Is that all you think she said? No wonder you don't get it."

Pretty snotty I'd say.

Now tell me what else she said.

Oh, I don't know... perhaps the fact that Ms. Coulter is seemingly obsessed with homosexuality? I think Dharma was talking about what else Ann Coulter had to say in her Edwards rant.

So if you're calling a married man a faggot, you may not mean gay.I have to admit I haven't been following this thread very closely, but do you think Coulter meant 'faggot' to mean something other than 'homosexual'?

You have to wonder why she (Ann coulter) is so focused on the sexual orientation of various Democratic leaders/politicians....

Not that it matters a whit to me, but Coulter has pretty much let it come out that she is a lesbian.

Personally, I don't care that she's a lesbian........EXCEPT that she might be the most hypocritical person on the planet, with all her anti-gay ranting and derision.

.... but do you think Coulter meant 'faggot' to mean something other than 'homosexual'?I'm not sure what she was thinking, but since he isn't gay it's possible she wasn't suggesting he was.
We're about the same age. Didn't you say fag or faggot in elementary school before Happy Days invented the word nerd.
I never meant homosexual when I said it.

I'm not sure what she was thinking, but since he isn't gay it's possible she wasn't suggesting he was.
Yes, because in 2007's USA we use faggot in another connotation.

All that hand holding with John Kerry in the last presidential election, his care for his appearance, and the fact that he is a democrat (a party in more support of gay marriage than the opposition), all do not contribute to Mrs. Coulter's insult.

She must've meant something else, like nerd.

Or cigarette butt.

You seem to be making the case that the shoe fits.
Are you assigning feminine traits to homosexuality?
That's so .... never mind.

The dems are loving people like Coulter ...

She and others, Rove comes to mind, are bringing down the entire republican party, a 200 year old institution, in just a matter of a few years.

Go ann, go Karl.

Go dems ... hang these people around the republicans necks ... the bathtub is in sight.

ROTF

Go dems ... hang these people around the republicans necks ... the bathtub is in sight.

ROTF

Ah and the Dems have Howard Dean for national chairman. Now there is someone to hang Dems with.

Ah and the Dems have Howard Dean for national chairman. Now there is someone to hang Dems with.

Dean was instrumental in the dems winning the house and senate with his 50-state strategy and he will again win more seats in '08 and '10 to make the senate fillibuster-proof and the house so lopsidded the republicans might as well stay home.

The republican party is in it's last throes.

Go Dean ... go dems.

Dean was instrumental in the dems winning the house and senate with his 50-state strategy and he will again win more seats in '08 and '10 to make the senate fillibuster-proof and the house so lopsidded the republicans might as well stay home.

The republican party is in it's last throes.

Go Dean ... go dems.
He will solidify conservatives and scare moderates. That is not healthy.

You really credit him for the Democratic victories? How about the candidates themselves? Consider that after a period a given party is in power, the American public almost always drifts to a "time for a change" mentality.

His performance was that of a buffoon and his political views confirm it. The Dems need to keep him in a cage.

Dean was instrumental in the dems winning the house and senate with his 50-state strategy and he will again win more seats in '08 and '10 to make the senate fillibuster-proof and the house so lopsidded the republicans might as well stay home.

The republican party is in it's last throes.

Go Dean ... go dems.

so you are for one party dictatorship? and you hate jews? man you sound more and more like a nazi everyday. Pretty soon you will be telling us we should just put down any undesireables in society so they dont hog valuable resources.

so you are for one party dictatorship? and you hate jews? man you sound more and more like a nazi everyday. Pretty soon you will be telling us we should just put down any undesireables in society so they dont hog valuable resources.



I was trying to ignore you trav but you're going over the line now.

Where did I say I hate jews ???

He will solidify conservatives and scare moderates. That is not healthy.

You really credit him for the Democratic victories? How about the candidates themselves? Consider that after a period a given party is in power, the American public almost always drifts to a "time for a change" mentality.

His performance was that of a buffoon and his political views confirm it. The Dems need to keep him in a cage.

What is it you don't understand about the dems taking seats in red states such as Virginia? That was the due to dem strategy (Dean, Pelosi, Emanuel et al) and had nothing to do with voters drifting.

And now it's even easier for the dems ... with the republicans eating their own over supporting Bush's war. Any senator that was marginally elected last time in a red state can kiss that seat good-bye.

What is it you don't understand about the dems taking seats in red states such as Virginia? That was the due to dem strategy (Dean, Pelosi, Emanuel et al) and had nothing to do with voters drifting.

And now it's even easier for the dems ... with the republicans eating their own over supporting Bush's war. Any senator that was marginally elected last time in a red state can kiss that seat good-bye.
Okay, let's say you're right, Dop, and the Republican Party is in it's "last throes". Do you think the 50% of America that fucking despises Democrats are just gonna roll over and vote for someone in their party? That's an incredibly stupid assumption. Even if they have no one else to vote for in the short term, do you think it'll stay that way? Don't make me laugh...

Are you assigning feminine traits to homosexuality?
Being a democrat is a feminine trait?

*awaits comical retort*

That's kinda like the old saying - all ice huts have Eskimos, but not all Eskimos have ice huts.

How's that? ;)

Being a democrat is a feminine trait?

*awaits comical retort*

lol, now that I think about it....

The republican party is in it's last throes.
Based on your prediction track-record, I find it comforting to hear you say this.

Where did I say I hate jews ???Dop, do we really need to do this again?
I think this is one of those dirty little secrets the board accepts at this point.

Being a democrat is a feminine trait?

*awaits comical retort*A priest, a rabbi and a gay walk into a bar....

Being a democrat is a feminine trait?

That's so gay

Okay, let's say you're right, Dop, and the Republican Party is in it's "last throes". Do you think the 50% of America that fucking despises Democrats are just gonna roll over and vote for someone in their party? That's an incredibly stupid assumption. Even if they have no one else to vote for in the short term, do you think it'll stay that way? Don't make me laugh...


Three words come to mind ... Judge Roy Moore.

Dop, do we really need to do this again?
I think this is one of those dirty little secrets the board accepts at this point.

That's typical of you brooks ... when asked to show the proof all you can come up with is the board (crissakes, try speaking for youself for once) has a little secret ... with again ... no proof -- just a secret :rolleyes:

You pathetically hide behind other board members.

If you think I hate jews, lay it on the table between the 2 of us.

use PM's, please

Three words come to mind ... Judge Roy Moore.
Ahhhh, I remember him now. Interesting fella. Out in left field, but definitively interesting, nonetheless.

From Wikipedia:

"Moore attended public schools, graduating in 1965 from Etowah County High School. Upon graduation, he was admitted to the United States Military Academy at West Point, where he graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in 1969. With the Vietnam conflict reaching its peak, Moore first served in several posts as a military police officer, including Fort Benning, Georgia, and Illesheim, Germany before being sent to Vietnam. Moore served as company commander of his MP unit and was known to be very strict (to the point of earning a reputation as "being a stickler for constant salutes and regulation haircuts in the midst of war"), earning him the derogatory nickname "Captain America." His role earned him several enemies, and he so feared being fragged that he recalls in his autobiography sleeping on sandbags to avoid a grenade or bomb being tossed under his cot.

Moore left the United States Army as a captain in 1974, and was admitted to the University of Alabama School of Law that same year, graduating with a Juris Doctor degree in 1977. After graduating, he returned to his hometown of Gadsden and began private practice, focusing on personal injury and insurance cases."

He's obviously not dumb, but to lose his post as Chief Justice to the Supreme Court of Alabama for not removing a wooden tablet is insanity. I mean, let's really examine the Ten Commandments, shall we:

1. You shall not worship any other god but YHWH. (Definitely inappropriate)

2. You shall not make a graven image. (Another example of something that shouldn't be mentioned in a court of law)

3. You shall not take the name of YHWH in vain. (Ditto)

4. You shall not break the Sabbath. (Double ditto)

5. You shall not dishonor your parents. (Now we get to the really good stuff - the really, really blood-thirsty shit...)

6. You shall not murder. (Is there a law against that, or something?)

7. You shall not commit adultery. (A court is no place to have your character judged, thank you very much. This needs to be removed.)

8. You shall not steal. (Like that's illegal...pfft. :rolleyes:)

9. You shall not commit perjury. (What...? Do you mean, like, in court? Who says I can't do that???)

10. You shall not covet. (Who are you - the morality police, or something? Fuck off, Nazi.)

sounds more like judge roy bean

....try speaking for youself for once
Firstly, even those who don't like me very much around here wouldn't say I hide in the crowd.

Secondly, remember when I quoted Marc Levin and your response was "Marc Levin? The Jew?".

There are countless other examples, but I don't have to dig them up for you to remind you of how you feel. You know already.

Secondly, remember when I quoted Marc Levin and your response was "Marc Levin? The Jew?".
I remember when he said that. It surprised the shit outta me, actually....(at the time, that is).

Secondly, remember when I quoted Marc Levin and your response was "Marc Levin? The Jew?".
That's gold.

you know who likes gold? The Jews. right dop?

I bet there is a deleted scene of Borat where he and Dop sing "Throw the Jew down the well" in a drunken karaoke game.

Yeah, totally, Evak...

This took place right down the street from Dop's summer home in Tucson, Az, and if you look really closely, you'll see the back of his head at around 2 minutes 28 seconds into this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb3IMTJjzfo

Whats this, gang up on Dop thread.

Firstly, even those who don't like me very much around here wouldn't say I hide in the crowd.

Secondly, remember when I quoted Marc Levin and your response was "Marc Levin? The Jew?".

There are countless other examples, but I don't have to dig them up for you to remind you of how you feel. You know already.

So I take it you are recinding the dop hates jews remark?

And sticking with dop said something about jews in regards to Marc Levin -- of course, you don't supply any content or context but what the heck ... close enough ... dop said the word jew so that proves he hates all jews ... :rolleyes:

Are we talking about the race or the religion here

Whats this, gang up on Dop thread.

Notice who started this thread ... I did and it happens on every thread that I start ... Brooks, Praetorian and Trav20 gang-up on me and accuse me of either being a racist or a jew hater. They can't argue the point of the thread so they take the mud-slinging route. It's a hit-n-run style of debate that is designed to be distasteful and make the thread quickly disappear into the archives due to lack of interest thus making the subject go away ... the subject they can't or won't debate.

As I said Dop, there are countless other examples. They're not needed to remind you of how you feel. Some here remember and you already know.

As I said Dop, there are countless other examples. They're not needed to remind you of how you feel. Some here remember and you already know.

Again you speak for the forum. Why is it that you individually made the accusation but need the forum to defend what you said?

Again you speak for the forum. Why is it that you individually made the accusation but need the forum to defend what you said?
Because he can't recall exactly what you said at the time you said it, but the best part is, he doesn't need to. We remember. Trust me, I say some racist shit on occasion (half the time to get a rise outta people - maybe to stir up some interesting (if not just spirited) conversation, who knows...), but you set a totally new benchmark with regards to being a dogmatist. The kicker is, you're the WORST kind of racist; you're racist UNINTENTIONALLY. It's like you're the product of some wackjob liberal reeducation class akin to what Laurence Harvey underwent in the Manchurian Candidate. You see the stars and bars, and all of the sudden it's bozo time in Cuckooville. You're like a Chatty Kathy doll; I expect you to have a little string on your chest that you pull out and watch snap back while reciting some of the dumbest shit I've ever heard…

"The Republican Party is in it's last throes"...."Bush will lose to Gore"...."Blacks, and err...trucks in Texas"...."The klan is alive and hanging swarthy people RIGHT NOW"...."Rednecks are everywhere!!!"...."The South is evil, etc., etc."

Brooks, Praetorian and Trav20 gang-up on me and accuse me of either being a racist or a jew hater.

Well gee whiz, Dop, you did write the word *Jew* in a post.

If you note that someone is a *Jew*, you must be a Jew-hater.

It's obvious.

[/sarcasm]

I have always noticed that DOP is so quick to label something before it happens, and also is so quick to label something before its even proven.

i.e. Hillary winning the 2008 election, Bush "lying" us into Iraq....

Well gee whiz, Dop, you did write the word *Jew* in a post.

If you note that someone is a *Jew*, you must be a Jew-hater.

It's obvious.

[/sarcasm]
Well, you're not one to talk right now. You've made it clear that you disdain over 85% of the world's population on the basis of "religious beliefs."

The kicker is, you're the WORST kind of racist; you're racist UNINTENTIONALLY.

I think his politics are rather knee-jerk stupid, but I don't think he is a racist, of either flavor--intentional or unintentional.

I am curious, however, how you reach the conclusion that unintentional racists (I think you mean those who claim to be tolerant but in fact are condescending or mildly hypocritical about it) are worse than real racists.

Real racists burn crosses in front years and join lynching parties. They insult minorities openly and laugh about it. They discriminate on purpose.

Is there anything worse than that?

I'm not sure what she was thinking, but since he isn't gay it's possible she wasn't suggesting he was.

No, it isn't.
When you put her comments in context, along with her proven pattern of accusations of homosexuality, it isn't possible she was suggesting Edwards is anything else other than gay.

He will solidify conservatives and scare moderates. That is not healthy.

Losing power and profits is what will solidify conservatives.
Dean doesn't scare moderates. He built his grassroots campaign on a moderate platform.


His performance was that of a buffoon and his political views confirm it. The Dems need to keep him in a cage.

What are you talking about? Be specific.

why is it OK to call someone a racist but not a faggot? Last I heard being a racist was bad but being a faggot was good. (Disclaimer* I in no way fear nor dislike homosexuals, i was simply using the language in the title of the thread *)

same reason why it's okay to call you insensitive but not a cracker

why is it OK to call someone a racist but not a faggot? Last I heard being a racist was bad but being a faggot was good. (Disclaimer* I in no way fear nor dislike homosexuals, i was simply using the language in the title of the thread *)
Racist is a label for someone's views. It can be used as a neutral comment, a slander, or even a compliment (if you live in FT's town). Faggot is a slang word with derogatory connotations here in America.

You're questioning why it should be okay to call someone something such as "atheist," when it is not okay to call them a "godless bastard." The Winter was hard on your mind, was it?

actually I was just trying to get the thread back on line since dop seems to thing there is a grand conspiracy to discredit him and stop talking about ann colter

.... along with her proven pattern of accusations of homosexuality, .....
Can you elaborate?

The amazing thing about this discussion is that Ann Coulter made her comments around the same time such left-wing illuminaries as Marzipan and Bill Maher were making jokes about wishing Cheney were killed by terrorists.

But saying faggot is evil and insensitive.

Can you elaborate?

See post #123

The amazing thing about this discussion is that Ann Coulter made her comments around the same time such left-wing illuminaries as Marzipan and Bill Maher were making jokes about wishing Cheney were killed by terrorists.

Maher said no such thing.

What I didn't say (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-maher/what-i-didnt-say_b_42687.html)- by Bill Maher

But saying faggot is evil and insensitive.

You have made it abundantly clear you don't think calling someone a faggot is wrong. You have made your point, stupid though it is.

Originally Posted by Lungdop Philing
Again you speak for the forum. Why is it that you individually made the accusation but need the forum to defend what you said?

Because he can't recall exactly what you said at the time you said it, but the best part is, he doesn't need to. We remember.

By all means, if you *remember* where Lungdop said that he 'hated Jews', please share it with me. You or Brooks either one.

I'm serious. I'd like to see the quote --or your recollection-- of what it was he said.

I missed it.

1. Maher said no such thing.
2. You have made it abundantly clear you don't think calling someone a faggot is wrong. You have made your point, stupid though it is.
1. Maher: I’m just saying if he did die, other people, more people would live. That’s a fact.
He did say it. And this is in far worse taste than saying faggot.

2. I said in another post that it is inappropriate. She shouldn't have said it.
But the reaction far surpasses the seriousness of the incident (that is unless one is using the incident to raise "Coulter Cash" on his fundraising page).

By all means, if you *remember* where Lungdop said that he 'hated Jews', please share it with me. You or Brooks either one.
Free, if you don't remember it's probably because it didn't bother you as much as it bothered me.
If someone says "Where did Freethinker say he doesn't care for Republicans" does that mean I have to find that as a quote from you?
There is no quote in which Lungdop says "I hate Jews", but there are many posts where he shows a strong, strong, strong dislike, antipathy etc toward them.

The amazing thing about this discussion is that Ann Coulter made her comments around the same time such left-wing illuminaries as Marzipan and Bill Maher were making jokes about wishing Cheney were killed by terrorists.


That is an abject lie.

Here is the exact quote of Maher.

""Have you heard about this, this week? The Taliban tried to blow up Dick Cheney. Don’t worry, he’s okay. [laughter] [audience reacts “aw”] [laughter] No, he was never in danger. At the time of the attack he was safely asleep in his coffin. [laughter] So… [applause] I’m joking. I just hope that this attempt on his life doesn’t turn him bitter, vicious and paranoid. Because that…..""

(I don't know any left-wing illuminaries <sic> named 'Marzipan'.)

1. Maher: I’m just saying if he did die, other people, more people would live. That’s a fact.
He did say it. And this is in far worse taste than saying faggot.

You claimed he "wished Cheney was killed by terrorists". He said no such thing. Your lies are worse than what you are claiming he said. He was clearly making a statement of fact, not making a wish.

What Maher did say isn't anywhere near as bad as what Coulter says on a regular basis.


2. I said in another post that it is inappropriate. She shouldn't have said it.

Then you would have to be a raging hypocrite to flip flop and try to defend what she said. Especially if you did it in an incredibly stupid way, like by claiming she might not have meant "gay".


But the reaction far surpasses the seriousness of the incident (that is unless one is using the incident to raise "Coulter Cash" on his fundraising page).

And here we have the flip flopping. It is inappropriate but you fault the victim for fighting back.

I applaud Edwards for not taking this bullshit lying down.

1. You claimed he "wished Cheney was killed by terrorists". He said no such thing.
2. What Maher did say isn't anywhere near as bad as what Coulter says on a regular basis.
3. Then you would have to be a raging hypocrite to flip flop and try to defend what she said.
4. And here we have the flip flopping. It is inappropriate but you fault the victim for fighting back.
5. I applaud Edwards for not taking this bullshit lying down.
1. His statement, in the context of the supposed assassination attempt, was that other people would live if Cheney were killed.
Also I said that Maher was "making jokes about wishing Cheney were killed" not "[I] claimed he wished Cheney was killed....."
Big difference.

2. Making a joke speculating about the VP getting killed is worse than saying faggot.

3. Where did I defend what she said (I really don't expect a reply to this)?

4. I didn't fault Edwards for fighting back. I said everyone's reaction was disproportionate.

5. Please tell me what big brave thing he did. Raised money?
I suggest you become more niggardly with your applause.

That is an abject lie.
Here is the exact quote of Maher.Yeah, that was a quote.
Not the one to which I was referring.

Free, if you don't remember it's probably because it didn't bother you as much as it bothered me.
If someone says "Where did Freethinker say he doesn't care for Republicans" does that mean I have to find that as a quote from you?
There is no quote in which Lungdop says "I hate Jews", but there are many posts where he shows a strong, strong, strong dislike, antipathy etc toward them.

Yeah...Louise Brooks.Very misunderstood,headstrong little
fireplug of an actress.Never got past her alluring mystique with
those in Hollywood,determined to shape her as they saw fit.
Lived a lrather long life,unknown by most.
In her heyday,her allure and sexiness,was almost unrivaled.
I've only seen a few of her movies.I can't take too much silent
era.But she certainly set the stage for Page girl type headstrongs.
Hers was similar to the great Greta Garbo.Those intense eyes
and profile,and inner strenght of independence.

YAWN!!!

Tell me again how you don't think she meant "gay". That was better than this garbage you are trying to sell now.

:lolhit:

Yeah, that was a quote.


So is this. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-maher/what-i-didnt-say_b_42687.html)

But what I said Friday -- and what I believe -- is that the Vice President has presided over a bungled execution of a war in which thousands of our bravest continue to die. And I believe that were he not in power, our troops would likely come home sooner. But I don't wish him dead.

Both quotes prove you are lying.

Yeah...Louise Brooks.Yeah, they broke the mold. No one else wants anymore of this posted here, but thanks for bringing it up.
http://silentladies.com/PBrooks.html

Both quotes prove you are lying.Yeah, that was another quote.
I don't know where he stated the quote I used, but those who heard it didn't have the luxury of all the other quotes we can Google today.

I said from the beginning he was joking, and I don't believe he really hoped it happened. But that doesn't make saying it alright.

1. His statement, in the context of the supposed assassination attempt, was that other people would live if Cheney were killed.
Also I said that Maher was "making jokes about wishing Cheney were killed" not "[I] claimed he wished Cheney was killed....."
Big difference.

2. Making a joke speculating about the VP getting killed is worse than saying faggot.

3. Where did I defend what she said (I really don't expect a reply to this)?

4. I didn't fault Edwards for fighting back. I said everyone's reaction was disproportionate.

5. Please tell me what big brave thing he did. Raised money?
I suggest you become more niggardly with your applause.


This is all rather NEATO.Supposed Grown adults engaged in
mere parsing of intent.Not word parsing,because that wood indicate
a clear and present agenda,unbecomst dignified schenfreude.
I digress.

Yeah, they broke the mold. No one else wants anymore of this posted here, but thanks for bringing it up.
http://silentladies.com/PBrooks.html

I beg your actress.If all it takes for an actress,is to act uppity and
feel,top of the mountain,with their singular pert look and
coy manner,then Miss Brooks was ALMOST Unique.
But,she proved to fail the ultimate test of true
thespianship and rigor.She quit too easy and with too
mush impatience.I wonder if Hollywood,ever uses her as a model for
-- Just who the hell does she think she Is --.
Hollywood makes and breaks more like her,in a year,than
politicians running for the many seats of congress.

I don't know where he stated the quote I used

That's because he never said it.

Hence the fact you are lying.

This is a bbc account.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/5326130.stm

This is all rather NEATO.Supposed Grown adults engaged in mere parsing of intent.Not word parsing,because that wood indicate
a clear and present agenda,unbecomst dignified schenfreude.
I digress.Intellectual haughtiness deserves far better presentation.

Intellectual haughtiness deserves far better presentation.

Those who Live by Liberal quotings by a Liberal media are
mere hobgoblin of necessity,run afoul.

Coulter was out of line to use it on such an "intelligent" and "good-mannered" stage...

however, in today's american society.. "faggot" is normally used in context. What is a stereotypical "faggot"? Someone who is thin, flamboyent, happy, and likes guys. So when two meatheads bump into each other at a bar, one will call the other a "faggot" or a "bitch" in order step down a level. The other meathead has the option of either leaving, and having some guy he doesn't know label him as a "faggot" or "bitch" and the matter will be forgotten instantaneously... OR, the meathead can step down and reply in kind, normally followed by pushing, loud yelling, insulting, and two guys trying to throw a punch or two as they either go to the ground or security steps in and kicks them out...

THAT is how the word is used...

That's because he never said it.
Hence the fact you are lying.
Here's the quote to which I was referring. It's from a transcript of (I think) an MSNBC show.

Whats the difference betwen a fact and a scenario, nothing if your a republican, it seems.

This is a bbc account.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/5326130.stm
Thanks Paul. But Armitage's mere admission is not enough proof for some.