ShadowWalker
12-20-2006, 01:15 AM
For nearly every subject, there is a typical starting place, and for those familiar with collegiate naming standards, the 101 class of a subject, starts there. For religion, it inevitably starts with the more western concept of ‘God’ or ‘No-God’. And while both sides adamantly speak up, few, allow in the Eastern concept of something even more basic. Namely, one or more? One what, more what???
Well, specifically, is all of this, reality I mean, really a collection of multiple individuals, or is it all a fabrication of one. I’m aware of the level of stupidity that it’s suggest, but ultimately we have to agree that reality starts with perception, and perception, can be fooled. Like right now, are you reading the typings of a person? How do you know? They are just words strung together in a sentence, which could have had any source.
Yet, honestly, I’ve always hated this train of thought, because it, like most topics in Religion, have no certifiable answer, other than the fact that too in-depth of a study, will certainly lead one to become certifiable. So it is very possible, that the most likely prophets of sort, are locked away somewhere.
Well, specifically, is all of this, reality I mean, really a collection of multiple individuals, or is it all a fabrication of one. I’m aware of the level of stupidity that it’s suggest, but ultimately we have to agree that reality starts with perception, and perception, can be fooled. Like right now, are you reading the typings of a person? How do you know? They are just words strung together in a sentence, which could have had any source.
Yet, honestly, I’ve always hated this train of thought, because it, like most topics in Religion, have no certifiable answer, other than the fact that too in-depth of a study, will certainly lead one to become certifiable. So it is very possible, that the most likely prophets of sort, are locked away somewhere.