The recent Supreme Court ruling striking down a Texas anti-sodomy law brings into question what factors were considered when the law was originally passed. A homosexual person is one who is sexually attracted to others of the same sex. Except for a genetic variation of nature, they are virtually identical to their heterosexual counter parts. They feel the very same kind of attraction to the same sex as heterosexuals feel about the opposite sex. Now, granted, there are those people who freely choose this behavior as a form of "life style" but that accounts for a very small population of homosexuals. In fact, if one is not genetically predispositioned for this behavior then by definition they are not truly homosexual but rather some deviant variation of perverted behavior. Some would argue that the Bible condemns homosexuality but I believe (through the persistence of science) this behavior will be proven to result from natural genetic variation. One can draw on the example of retarded people who by no action of their own are born comparatively slow or deficient in mental, physical, or emotional growth. Homosexual people are therefore entitled to engage in sexual behavior consistent with their genetic makeup so long as it is between consenting adults. To deny them this right would be the same as denying heterosexuals their right to consensual sex. Some would argue that sexuality is strictly for the purpose of reproduction but yet the animal kingdom has many variations of species who also cannot reproduce. Human beings are sexual beings as was intended by their creator and to suggest that a genetic variation of nature somehow makes homosexuals less human is indeed an inhuman concept.

How can a guy look at another guys hairy ass and see beauty or love? WTF?

Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Frankly, I don't understand it either.

It’s common logic that condemns homosexuality: it takes a man & a woman to have a baby. Without heterosexuality, the human race could not reproduce. Therefore, logic suggests that heterosexuality is the way it was meant to be.

Oh, and if you’re thinking about bringing up artificial insemination or genetic cloning, remember that we didn’t always have those options.

Originally posted by Travh20
How can a guy look at another guys hairy ass and see beauty or love? WTF?

:D :D :D LMAO :D :D :D

Mopo, that's only a problem if everyone's gay. Let's remember that most estimates are that only about 10% of the population is gay. That's still a lot a breeders, even the old-fashioned way.

LOL, there is no way in hell that 10% of the population is gay! thats a liberal made figure, kind of like when the feminsts redefined rape as a unwanted glance and all of a sudden 1 in 3 women have been raped.

Hi all.

Mopo still doesn't get it? Munchmausen's right, thats only a problem if the entire planet was gay. 10%, trav, is still a rather small percentage, and I think that would be world wide, not neighborhood wide. Also, with most gays, people don't know that they are gay, society shuns gays, remember? They like to hide. Homosexuality is just a way to try and help over-population. With that I think we'd need about 50% to do any damage to birth rate... monty python movie,
"Every sperm is sacred.
Every sperm is great.
If a sperm is wasted,
God gets quite irate."
"Look at them, bloody Catholics, filling the bloody world up with bloody people they can't afford to bloody feed."
lol, ok...

Trav, is that raped woman figure neighborhood-wide? They tend to keep quiet about it too... Even thought an entire third is a bit large, world-wide it would fit.

Letter from a Gay Son's Mother (http://www.allforums.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1765)
My opinion on homosexual marriages (http://www.allforums.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2214)
Supreme Court Constitutionally Protects Sodomy (http://www.allforums.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2206)
On Alternative Lifestyles (http://www.allforums.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1778)
Homosexuality (http://www.allforums.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2230)


Sadonecrobestiophilia... flogging a dead horse?

Apparently we like the topic.
IT WASN'T ME!

Those are the high-end estimates, yes. I meant to mention that before. oops. In any case, that further supports my statement that there are still more than enough people to continue the species.

First of all, I never said anything about the human race being threatened with extinction. My point is this: It takes a man and a woman to have a child, therefore common logic suggests that homosexuality is wrong.

Secondly, I think MORE than 10% of the population is gay. A more accurate number would be about 30 or 40%. You see them everywhere you go.

Oh, and Blib, you DO know that all of those “Monty Python” guys were gay don’t you? After all, that show DID come from England.

How many homosexuals does a population sustain? (http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FRI_AIM_Talk.html#top)

10% is a significant number in a population the size of the U.S. Were it accurate, every politician out there would be fighting for their votes, much the same as they go after the Teamsters or the Conservative Christians.