OK, so Liberia is asking for a US troop presence, and Howard Dean, the liberal Democrap presidential front runner thinks we should send some troops to liberate the Liberians from their tyranical dictator, who has commited crimes against humanity against them. Thats right, the same guy who went kicking and screaming into Iraq to free those people from their tyranical dictator who commited crimes against humainty against them, and still in the end "doesnt know if the iraqis are beter off without Sadaam" Is it possible that Dean only wants to help the Libereans out because they DONT have oil, and no claim of "Bolod for oil!" can be made against him? Is he prejudiced against oil producing countries, and only will help non oil producing countries? Was he willing to let the iraqis suffer indefinately under Sadaams and his sons eternal rule so as not to be labeled a big oil canididate? HMMMM, could be.

I don't particularly like any of the Democratic contenders with the exceptions of Bob Graham and Kuchinich (sp?).

Of course, I still firmly believe Nader would make a great president. Too bad he's not running.

Nader's an idiot. His first act would be to ban corporations or make them liable for everything they ever did in perpetuity. The giant sucking sound would be every corporation leaving for someplace else.

Originally posted by LionelHutz
Nader's an idiot. His first act would be to ban corporations or make them liable for everything they ever did in perpetuity. The giant sucking sound would be every corporation leaving for someplace else. Dont you know that is what liberals want? Then even more would be dependant upon the government. :)