PDA

View Full Version : I thought the Gov't put an end to war defectors fleeing to Canada


Dunkirk101
11-04-2006, 05:16 PM
I was sure that back during the Reagan Administration, the Gov't made a deal with Canada allowing the U.S. to go across the border and arrest any war defectors or draft dodgers they decided to flee the country. Apparently I was wrong :eek:


AWOL soldiers reconsider return to U.S. By BRETT BARROUQUERE, Associated Press Writer
Sat Nov 4, 6:49 AM ET



LOUISVILLE, Ky. - Since going to Canada to avoid another deployment to Iraq, Corey Glass has considered returning to the United States. But after hearing that a fellow former soldier who surrendered to the military and was ordered to return to his unit instead of being discharged, Glass may not return at all.

http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/4060/01gg3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

"They're not going to win the hearts and minds like that," said Glass, 24, who signed on with the Indiana National Guard in 2002.

Kyle Snyder, a one-time combat engineer who joined the military in 2003, disappeared Wednesday, a day after surrendering at Fort Knox and 18 months after fleeing to Vancouver instead of redeploying to Iraq.

Snyder, 23, of Colorado Springs, Colo., said a deal had been reached for a discharge, but he found out he would be returned to his unit at Fort Leonard Wood, Mo.

His troubles are complicating efforts for those among the 220 American soldiers who fled to Canada and want to return to the United States, according to lawyers, soldiers and anti-war activists.

"Nobody's going to come back from Canada anymore," said James Fennerty, a Chicago-based attorney who represents Snyder and other AWOL soldiers.

Several soldiers who went to Canada have said they don't want to return to Iraq. Sgt. Patrick Hart, who deserted the Fort Campbell, Ky.-based 101st Airborne Division in August 2005, a month before his second deployment, said he felt misled about the reasons for the war.

"How can I go over there if I don't believe in the cause? I still consider myself a soldier, but I can't do that," said Hart, a Buffalo, N.Y., native who served more than nine years in the military.

"The whole story behind it, it all feels like a big lie," Glass said. "I ain't fighting for no lie."

Fennerty said he reached a deal with the Army allowing Snyder, a private with the 94th Engineer Battalion, to receive an other-than-honorable discharge.

It's a deal similar to one Darrell Anderson, a 24-year-old Iraq war veteran, received in October. After three days at Fort Knox, Anderson, who has denounced the war as "illegal" and "immoral," was released to his family in Lexington, then discharged.

But Snyder ended up at a bus station in Louisville, with orders to go to St. Louis, then Fort Leonard Wood. Snyder, who said the brutality of what he saw happening to civilians in Iraq prompted him to desert, left with an anti-war activist instead of going back to the post.

Gini Sinclair, a Fort Knox spokeswoman, declined to address Snyder's case. But she said deserters who turn themselves in are automatically returned to their units if the unit is in the United States at the time of surrender. Once reunited with the unit, the commander there decides what becomes of the soldier, Sinclair said.

When a soldier surrenders at Fort Knox and is sent to his unit, he is either put on a plane or a bus, sometimes alone, she said.

"In some cases, they will be escorted," Sinclair said. "I don't know what decides if that happens."

That policy, and the question of whether an AWOL soldier can reach a deal that trumps it, is causing consternation among soldiers.

"After what they did to him, I don't see anybody going back," said Glass, a Fairmount, Ind., native who is currently in Toronto.

Some are seeking refugee status in Canada. Hart, who was joined in Toronto by his wife and their 3-year-old son, served time in Bosnia in the early 1990s, became a reserve, then went to Iraq after returning to active duty. The idea of returning to the United States is appealing to Hart, because he would like to see family and friends.

"I could see going back under some kind of amnesty program or something like that," Hart said. "But I don't trust them. My enemy isn't foreign now. It's domestic."


link:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061104/ap_on_re_us/awol_soldier

es347fan
11-04-2006, 06:29 PM
Want to know where you find sympathy in the dictionary? In between shit and syphilis. I have no respect for a deserter - especially one trying to make "deals".

500lbguerilla
11-04-2006, 09:14 PM
funny you've not used such harsh words for military recruiters who lie to potential soldiers...

Evakian
11-04-2006, 09:17 PM
When you join the military, you pledge yourself. Who cares if you disagree with a war that you're about to be thrust into? Your superior officer likely doesn't. Any and every deserter entering our soil again needs to be detained and face trial.
funny you've not used such harsh words for military recruiters who lie to potential soldiers..
I've chatted with quite a few of these men to see what the military has to offer our nation's youngsters in this time of war. What were the lies you seem upset over?

500lbguerilla
11-04-2006, 09:26 PM
troops are suppossed to uphold and defend the constitution. If they see the war as unconstitutional then they are upholding their pledge.
+++++++++++++++++++++

An ABC News undercover investigation showed Army recruiters telling students that the war in Iraq was over, in an effort to get them to enlist.
http://articles.news.aol.com/news/_a/cameras-show-army-recruiters-misleading/20061103145309990002?ncid=NWS00010000000001

Evakian
11-04-2006, 09:35 PM
troops are suppossed to uphold and defend the constitution. If they see the war as unconstitutional then they are upholding their pledge.
Who said that gives them the right to desert the military?
An ABC News undercover investigation showed Army recruiters telling students that the war in Iraq was over, in an effort to get them to enlist.
http://articles.news.aol.com/news/_a/cameras-show-army-recruiters-misleading/20061103145309990002?ncid=NWS00010000000001
Okay, an isolated incident. Whoopee.
And since it has never been discussed at AllForums during my stead here, when did es have the opportunity to criticize or praise the efforts of these recruiters?

funny you've not used such harsh words for military recruiters who lie to potential soldiers...

Imagineer
11-05-2006, 12:03 AM
When you sign raise your right hand and take the enlistment oath, you in effect become government property. You give up the right to decide when and where you will go, or what your duties will consist of. You give those things up for the common good. Military service involves sacrifice. Many young people who enlist don't fully understand that, although by the end of basic training they should have gotten with the program. If they can't, and choose to desert, the military is better off without them. They need to be prosecuted because they have not honored their commitment. They should be considered for retention only on a case by case basis, and only if they are judged likely to change their behavior.

Oldtimer
11-05-2006, 12:16 AM
troops are suppossed to uphold and defend the constitution. If they see the war as unconstitutional then they are upholding their pledge.

Hmm, that doesn't quite conform to how I read the UCMJ, but then I'm not a lawyer. Anyway, they should refuse to obey the order and take their chances in a court martial.

Dunkirk101
11-05-2006, 01:03 AM
Want to know where you find sympathy in the dictionary? In between shit and syphilis. .

*ROFL* :D http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v112/starguard/anim_rofl.gif

I'm gonna have to remember to use that one when my relatives call asking to borrow money :thumbs:

F. de Marzipan
11-05-2006, 10:21 AM
troops are suppossed to uphold and defend the constitution.

So is the President, but he has obviously abandoned that directive, in amazing and frightening ways.

Tell me, 500lb, what do you think of Mr. Bush's illegal wiretapping program (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_controversy)? What do you think of his revocation of Habeas Corpus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habeas_corpus#Suspension_in_the_United_States_duri ng_the_.22War_on_Terrorism.22)? What do you think about his hundreds of "signing statements (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signing_statement)?" How do you feel about Bush's refusal to allow Congressional oversight (http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Bush_declares_immunity_from_Patriot_Act_oversight) with regard to the Patriot Act and the FBI's expanded police powers?

Do you also hold him responsible for failing to uphold and protect the Constitution?

Jester
11-05-2006, 10:55 AM
Tell me, 500lb, what do you think of Mr. Bush's illegal wiretapping program (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_controversy)? What do you think of his revocation of Habeas Corpus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habeas_corpus#Suspension_in_the_United_States_duri ng_the_.22War_on_Terrorism.22)? What do you think about his hundreds of "signing statements (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signing_statement)?" How do you feel about Bush's refusal to allow Congressional oversight (http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Bush_declares_immunity_from_Patriot_Act_oversight) with regard to the Patriot Act and the FBI's expanded police powers?

Do you also hold him responsible for failing to uphold and protect the Constitution?Hehe, talk about preaching to the choir.

F. de Marzipan
11-05-2006, 11:10 AM
What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Isn't it?

sedan
11-05-2006, 11:41 AM
Only when it's the pot calling the kettle black.

sedan
11-05-2006, 11:58 AM
And even then you might be out of the frying pan and into the fire.

500lbguerilla
11-05-2006, 01:44 PM
Okay, an isolated incident. Whoopee yeah 'isolated' like torturing prisoners in Iraq....

did you bother reading the article?

"Last year, the Army suspended recruiting nationwide to retrain recruiters following hundreds of allegations of improprieties."

Military Recruiters Lie About Dangers In Iraq
http://www.wlwt.com/news/4508233/detail.html

Deceptions in Military Recruiting:
An ex-Insider Speaks Out
http://www.objector.org/insider.html

Stuff about this has been posted before on these boards.

Oh and I found out that it's against military code to lie to recruits. The trick is actually catching them.

When you sign raise your right hand and take the enlistment oath, you in effect become government property. You give up the right to decide when and where you will go, or what your duties will consist of. yup. Slavery.
And even then you might be out of the frying pan and into the fire. ;)

Jester
11-05-2006, 05:36 PM
Deceptions in Military Recruiting:
An ex-Insider Speaks Out
http://www.objector.org/insider.htmlWell now I know where you get your bizarre ideas about the military - it's the crap that you read.

yup. Slavery.Slaves don't voluntarily sign a contract and cannot quit once that contract is over. That aside, the military simply would not function if people could quit whenever they like or be stationed wherever they like.