If you suck in Algebra, then this may be hard for you to understand.

First let's get things straight. We all know that TIME equals MONEY. Also, we know that MONEY is the root of all EVIL.

Now let's begin with WOMEN equal TIME and MONEY. So because of this (TIME equals MONEY) we can say that WOMEN equal MONEY and MONEY. Because of this (WOMEN equal MONEY and MONEY) we can say the WOMEN equals MONEY squared. Because we know that MONEY is the root of all EVIL we can say that EVIL equals MONEY squared. Because WOMEN equals MONEY squared
and EVIL equals MONEY squared, we can finally algebricly find that WOMEN equals EVIL.

hahahahahahaa, interesting, interesting indeed........

Hmmm.. I know a similar joke with the US. :devil:

USA= power * money
Having money means having power.
USA=money˛
Money is the root of all evil.
USA=sqrt(evil)˛
USA=evil
q.e.d.

No, don't hit me.. Ouch.. ouch.. Just kidding.. Oouuch!
:leave:

BTW, there's an error in your calculation!

[quote:f00e3fe481]Because of this (WOMEN equal MONEY [b:f00e3fe481]and[/b:f00e3fe481] MONEY) we can say the WOMEN equals MONEY [b:f00e3fe481]squared[/b:f00e3fe481].[/quote:f00e3fe481]
1) women=money[b:f00e3fe481]+[/b:f00e3fe481]money
2) women=money˛=money[b:f00e3fe481]*[/b:f00e3fe481]money

1=2) money+money != money*money

:toungue12

funny stuff, sad but true, women=evil



one thing you forgot
women=no money or should it be
women + money = men broke

Neg that isn't funny about the USA=evil. The USA is not evil, they are the peacekeepers of the world.

IMO canada is more of a peackeeper than the US is...

[quote:83021f98b2]Neg that isn't funny about the USA=evil. The USA is not evil, they are the peacekeepers of the world.[/quote:83021f98b2]
That's ridiculous. Of course, the US is not evil, but it is also not "the peacekeepers of the world". Being a peacekeeper would need the willingness to prevent wars and decrease international tension. The US is often doing the opposite, e.g. this "axis of evil" crap.

But if you interpret "peacekeeper" as "destroying all enemies in order to achieve peace", then you're probably right.

I take peacekeeper to mean to take any steps necessary to ensure that freedom will continue and to prevent evil from dominating the world.

Hey!!! Not [b:2f13b6b79d]ALL[/b:2f13b6b79d] of us are evil. That's like saying all men are jerks. It's true in some cases, but not in all. :(

Your right. Not all women are evil, but I haven't met any that were not.

I'm not a jerk. But there are alot of men that are.

The discussion about the USA and their probable role as peacekeepers is getting offtopic. That's why I created a new thread (http://www.allforums.net/forum/showthread.php?s=&postid=1861#post1861) in the Political Forum.

You are not meaning to say the USA is evil, but it seems like you are. You might not like the USA but don't diss us.



The USA tries to keep the peace between countries in war. They USA sends troops to those and helps the civilians in those countries. The USA only goes to war when they have to. We had to go to war against terrorism. It is not like we are killing their civilians, we are helping those people.


Don't playa hate, participate!!!!

Savage I'm amazed by you're ignorance. Don't diss us never once had neg "diss" you infact he or she is sharing there opinion are you "dissing" neg and my self by giving us you're opinion? The United States does send troops to other countries but how come United States has the right to do so but other countires don't and when they try we bomb the utter crap out of them? Also when we send troops over to other countries it causes controversy causing problems and there goes your peace out the window... The united states does not go to war when they haft to we have gone to war before to test out new weapons thats a lame excuse for war... its called panama deseption check it out and learn how sad this country can be! We have gone to war against terriorism in the past sevral times it has not made a diffrence maybe its time we look for alternative methods to war! And you also states its not like we are killing civilians what! are you blind and deaf are do you just get all your news from filthy news coperations who have there ----s so far up the goverments butt they only show what they like you to show! In fact we have killed 4,000 innocent civilians and there are hundreds straving at refugee camps daily wow we are doing alot to help now arent we. And you can help them by giving them proper health care, education, jobs, roads, buildings! Put those school books away and turn off that TV and learn about what really happens not what they want us to see! Also don't give me an ignorant stupid comment like if you dis-like america move to another country! I don't hate american in fact im proud to have my freedoms I do but at the same time I can't enjoy my freedoms knowing others are oppressed!

If you dont fight to make a change than your the one betraying this country!

foodnotbombs.net
warresisters.com

Peace, Love, Unity

Name one time that the USA bombed a country to test out our weapons?

So much for are schools teaching us American history correctly!!!!

It's called Panama deception. This is an event already lost. undoubtedly because it is embarrassing to bring back a shamful episode in American history. This refers to the year 1989, the first year of Bush the elder's presidency, when the United States invaded the tiny Republic of Panama with 26,000 troops, smashed neighborhoods with bombs and shells, and killed hundreds of innocent civilians. All sorts of excuses given, all kinds of lies told, told to justify this. But the real reason was one common to president puffed up with power and wanting to exercise it. Bush, new if office, wanted to show how tough he was. Another reason: U.S. control over the Panama Canal had ended during the Carter administration, after a hundred years, and our goverment wanted to show that it was still boss in Panama. Another reason was the U.S. wanted to try out some new weapons, including the new steath fighter-bomber. Goverments everywhere have always been willing to sacrifice human life to test new techniques for slaughter. Remember that in 1989 was the year the Soviet Union was falling apart and the Cold War was ending. You might think that this was a time for the United States to become more peaceful, less agressive in the world. But no, this was a time to show that we now had no powerful rivals, that we were #1, top dog, the one remaining superpower, and no one could challenge us, certainly not a two-bit dictator like the one in Panama, Manuel Noriega. So for this, ordinary people in Panama had to die. While to Soviet Union was a powerful military force, the United States could use the "the soviet threat" as an excuse to send troops anywhere in the world to suppress revoluntionary movements. This was done in Vietnam under Johnson and Nixon, in the attempt to invade Cuba under Kennedy, in the invasion of Grenada under Reagan. Deprived by 1989 of "the soviet threat" as its excuse, the U.S. found new justifcation as it went back to old-fashion imperialism, sending military forces into Latian America and other areas in order to extend American economic and political influence around the world. The invasion on Panama was the first post-cold-war use of military force. And even though alot of this had to do with other reasons as I said a main reason was to test new weapons and other stupid military things out.

Next time Savage before posting you're opinion learn you're American history and don't always believe what you're teachers or the media tells you. If you would like to find out more about our history or find out what actully happened or is happening check out these few websites savage or I encourage anyone else to check them out!

Znet.org
Progressive.org
AKpress.com -great website

A list of books are

What are historic sites get wrong
Lies my teacher told me
A peoples history of the united states 1492 to the present

Thanks for reading

Peace, Love, Unity

[quote:c3899e57f4]The USA is not evil, they are the peacekeepers of the world.[/quote:c3899e57f4]
Hahahaha... some people are so naive... peacekeepers of the world Lol....

[color=darkred:9f492c72b8]All Women evil??????????????
nah, and hey if we were, consider the fact that women make up the majority of at-home carers for their children.
soooooooooo, If we are evil, then we would bring our kids up evil, so now, dammit, we've just made everybody evil!
(men needed less help to get there though!)
:) [/color:9f492c72b8]

[quote:8e5b113dec="ConfusedYouth"]So much for are schools teaching us American history correctly!!!!

It's called Panama deception. This is an event already lost. undoubtedly because it is embarrassing to bring back a shamful episode in American history. This refers to the year 1989, the first year of Bush the elder's presidency, when the United States invaded the tiny Republic of Panama with 26,000 troops, smashed neighborhoods with bombs and shells, and killed hundreds of innocent civilians. All sorts of excuses given, all kinds of lies told, told to justify this. But the real reason was one common to president puffed up with power and wanting to exercise it. Bush, new if office, wanted to show how tough he was. Another reason: U.S. control over the Panama Canal had ended during the Carter administration, after a hundred years, and our goverment wanted to show that it was still boss in Panama. Another reason was the U.S. wanted to try out some new weapons, including the new steath fighter-bomber.

[/quote:8e5b113dec]


There are two sides to every story and unfortunately you seem to choose the anti-american side for everything. Hey everybody Forget the facts and listen to Confused Youth. Here are some facts:

1. Noriega was a corrupt dictator heading an efficient narcomilitaristic regime in Panama.

2. He was involved in drug trafficking, arms smuggling, money laundering, and the ruthless oppression of his people.

3. He also systematically violated the American-Panamanian Canal treaties and harassed U.S. forces and institutions in Panama.

During the Carter Administration a treaty was negotiated to give Panama control of the Canal by the end of the Century. Was this a good enough reason for our opperations in panama? I don't Know we could have just let the people in panama suffer under his rule, that would have been the "Humain" thing to do.

Don't be fooled by the websites or books this guy recomends, as they are socialist propaganda. Unfortunately certain people believe that socialism and freedom go hand in hand, when thare opposite.

Not quite humorous, but it's a fun spot-the error problem.

Step 1: a and b > 0
Step 2: a = b
Step 3: a˛ = ab
Step 4: a˛ - b˛ = ab - b˛
Step 5: (a + b)(a - b) = b(a - b)
Step 6: (a + b) = b
Step 7: b + b = b
Step 8: 2b = b
Step 9: 2 = 1
Answer (http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/4403/One_equals_two.html)

(x-a)(x-b)(x-c)...(x-z)= ?

just something for the math magicians to amuse themselves with

The answer is 0. x-x=0 and anything times 0 is 0. Therefore, one "times 0" in a multiplication problem makes it automatically 0.

Originally posted by X-Sklusive

we can finally algebricly find that WOMEN equals EVIL.



Spoken like a man incapable of getting laid.

Originally posted by SB54


1. Noriega was a corrupt dictator heading an efficient narcomilitaristic regime in Panama.

2. He was involved in drug trafficking, arms smuggling, money laundering, and the ruthless oppression of his people.

3. He also systematically violated the American-Panamanian Canal treaties and harassed U.S. forces and institutions in Panama.


4. He was a CIA agent who started becoming embarrassing for Bush (where did he work before being president ? CIA ! )