Looks as though there may have been a connection to al Qaeda after all.http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/04/26/sprj.irq.britain.iraq.ap/index.html

Nice to see that brought up again. There was a link established between obl's camel jockeys & the iraqi idiot's minions. Wasn't much to go on, only that some of the 9/11 hijackers met with "Iraqi intelligence" in Czechoslovakia.

the left will say that sdaam didnt really have knowl;edge of this, it was only his secret police that did

I'll ask if it has been verified yet.

They planted the evidence! They planted the evidence!!

Originally posted by Blibblob
I'll ask if it has been verified yet.

Blibblob never needs accusations of American wrong doing verified, he just believes them, but when it comes to believing wheter or not a bloody dictator and a violent terrorist organization are connected, he needs verification :rolleyes:

Just because he asked a simple question like "has it been varified" you jump on his god damn case when you ass holes did the exact same thing to me when I showed evidence.

[Threats/Hate speech/Wishing someone dead will no longer be tolerated. Consider this your warning, Shoot_the_kids. Once more and you will be banned -- Mod]

Originally posted by Shoot_The_Kids
Just because he asked a simple question like "has it been varified" you jump on his god damn case when you ass holes did the exact same thing to me when I showed evidence.

Go kill your self! (Hopefully dave will go first :) )

Shut up idiot, everytime one of you leftist get burned or caught in a lie you pull the innocence card and try to make the guy who burned you into the idiot, I guess eternal victimhood is the lefts way.

Nope. I never said the report was false he just asked for some varification. The media has a long history of being wrong dip-shit.

Originally posted by Shoot_The_Kids
Nope. I never said the report was false he just asked for some varification. The media has a long history of being wrong dip-shit. Yes the media does have a long history of being incorrect. But if you do something simple, like read the damn article, you would find out if it was verified or not. Would you really take our word for it being verified without finding out for yourself?

I didn't say it wasn't varified I was defending blid because he was attacked for asking a question.

The media also has a longer history of being right.

The media also has a better history of being wrong so its always good to question... Something I wish you would participate in... but then that would be anti-american... oh fuck! I guess your screwed!

This was an article by CNN. Did you notice they said "stated the newspaper" every time they spoke about the papers? Therefore, it has NOT yet been verified, and all we have is a small British newspaper saying they found proof. Thats not enough for me, I'd like somebody to verify them please.

Originally posted by Blibblob
This was an article by CNN. Did you notice they said "stated the newspaper" every time they spoke about the papers? Therefore, it has NOT yet been verified, and all we have is a small British newspaper saying they found proof. Thats not enough for me, I'd like somebody to verify them please. Cpngratulations!!!!! You actually read the article. How long did it take?

I read the damn article right when you posted it. I always fucking read your articles. Do you ever bother to educate yourself?

hey dickhead, just becasue someone doesnt agree with you soesnt mean they are not educated. I bet blib is a spoiled little rich kid, he's gotta be to think the way he does.

Originally posted by Blibblob
I read the damn article right when you posted it. I always fucking read your articles. Do you ever bother to educate yourself? Unlike you, i always read and try to make certain i comprehend something i make a comment on. I was simply saying the answer to your question was in the article, and if you took the time to read it you would know the answer. Sorry if i hit a raw nerve.

nothing is verified to these 2 twits unless either Sadaam or the North Koreans vouch for it.

Blib,

Whatever it's worth, I completely understand and support your concern. A small paper claims to have found documents that our expansive military/intelligence network can't seem to locate and suddenly the spazo-conservatives think they have proven the link between Bin Laden and Saddam.

Not only that, even if we take this paper's investigation as gospel, all they've found is that Al Qeada and Iraq have met to discuss the possibility of joining forces.....that hardly proves they were working together.

Hey fellas - it was also reported in Toronto's big paper... what is it, the Toronto Sun? Anyhow, suck on that for awhile.

Originally posted by DaveTooner
Hey fellas - it was also reported in Toronto's big paper... what is it, the Toronto Sun? Anyhow, suck on that for awhile.

The question isn't who's reporting it, I mean CNN is clearly reporting it if you're really looking for credible reporters. The question is the source.

Yeah, and the way I understand it is that candian reporters from Toronto along with the British reporters are the source.

Originally posted by Leper
The question isn't who's reporting it, I mean CNN is clearly reporting it if you're really looking for credible reporters. The question is the source.

Tell me einstein, what source would you believe?

Personally, I'd believe the FBI if they said it is verified and credible. But thats only because they would have hired an expert, and they are already sick and tired of having somebody lie and have to clean up the mess(BUSH ALERT, BUSH ALERT).

Blib would believe the FBI? Why dont you believe them when they say iraq and al queada are linked, or that tey have WMD?

Blib would believe the FBI? Why dont you believe them when they say iraq and al queada are linked, or that tey have WMD?
Because they never did. They and the CIA said that there was no link, and they stayed off the topic of WMD. They had to fix Bush's flat lies, just what they have to do for any president who fucks up.

Originally posted by Blibblob
Personally, I'd believe the FBI if they said it is verified and credible. But thats only because they would have hired an expert, and they are already sick and tired of having somebody lie and have to clean up the mess(BUSH ALERT, BUSH ALERT). Omg. One of the biggest conspiracy theorists on the panel would believe the FBI? LMFAO!!!!!

In this case yes. Look at the FBI's basic stance with this war, they don't like fixing Bush's mistakes, Bush says there is a link with Al Qaeda, there isn't, the FBI and the CIA have to come in and fix Bush's dumb mistake. Bush says there's WMD, the FBI and the CIA are just like "shit...". Still none.

blob, who made you the expert on absolutly everything in the freaking world?

Travh20 if I remember correctly your the guy who always claims his position is right... hypocrit...

ohhh I am so hurt and scared by your big wods you race traitor bitch.

Enough of the insults, guys, let's get back on topic.

Race traitor? lol

I am white and about 65% of my friends are white so how in the hell can I be a race traitor?

man you are dumb. You call white people crackers in an insulting way, and you are white!! do you know what traitor means? I dont think you do. Go type race traitor in a search engine and I bet you like what you see.

Lol, that website was funny...

I was not using the word "cracker" meaning a certain kind of race.

I guess you failed to read my post because I did say almost half of my friends are white and I am white but I certainly don't glorify my race. Anyway it's just a color so who really cares... I guess only the real racist do... (looks at travh20)

I have no friends. So I guess that means I'm racist to everybody?

I'm racist to morons...

Racism rules! haha

Oh, don't take that post seriously I fucking hate racism more than anything...

almost as much as conservatism, but i am sure to him they are the same thing. And just what did you mean when you called me a cracker, you meant like a saltine right? LOL, nice try.

Back on topic, please, guys?