500lbguerilla
10-02-2005, 02:33 PM
President Bush Pushing Abortion Ban
Administration Wants Supreme Court Review of What It Calls 'Partial-Birth' Abortion
WASHINGTON (Sept. 26) - The Bush administration is asking the Supreme Court to reinstate a national ban on a type of late-term abortion, a case that could thrust the president's first court picks into an early tie-breaking role on a divisive and emotional issue.
The appeal follows a two-year, cross-country legal fight over the law and highlights the power that Bush's nominees will have. Just a few months ago, there would have been five votes to strike down the law, which bars what critics call partial birth abortion
http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20050926130709990008
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Wow they didn't even wait for Rehnquist's body to cool did they?
Now its my understanding that 3rd term abortions are regulated by the government via a court order in which they must prove quality of life or threat to the mothers life to obtain. Am I wrong on this? Is it the choice of the states?
That being said I fully agree that 3rd term abortions should be regulated. If you are pregnant you would know by the 2nd term at the very latest. So theres no room for the "I didn't know" excuse. If you can't make up your mind by that point the sympathy meter is running on empty. There are no excuses to nto know or take action before the 3rd trimester. In the 2nd half of the 2nd term is when the brain starts functioning. This is what I would consider the beginnings of life. When memory and sensations start being recorded.
Of course the Pro-choicers will scream about how this is just one step towards outlawing abortion. And of course they will be right because the religious extremists won't stop at this.
and around and around and around we go....
Administration Wants Supreme Court Review of What It Calls 'Partial-Birth' Abortion
WASHINGTON (Sept. 26) - The Bush administration is asking the Supreme Court to reinstate a national ban on a type of late-term abortion, a case that could thrust the president's first court picks into an early tie-breaking role on a divisive and emotional issue.
The appeal follows a two-year, cross-country legal fight over the law and highlights the power that Bush's nominees will have. Just a few months ago, there would have been five votes to strike down the law, which bars what critics call partial birth abortion
http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20050926130709990008
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Wow they didn't even wait for Rehnquist's body to cool did they?
Now its my understanding that 3rd term abortions are regulated by the government via a court order in which they must prove quality of life or threat to the mothers life to obtain. Am I wrong on this? Is it the choice of the states?
That being said I fully agree that 3rd term abortions should be regulated. If you are pregnant you would know by the 2nd term at the very latest. So theres no room for the "I didn't know" excuse. If you can't make up your mind by that point the sympathy meter is running on empty. There are no excuses to nto know or take action before the 3rd trimester. In the 2nd half of the 2nd term is when the brain starts functioning. This is what I would consider the beginnings of life. When memory and sensations start being recorded.
Of course the Pro-choicers will scream about how this is just one step towards outlawing abortion. And of course they will be right because the religious extremists won't stop at this.
and around and around and around we go....