PDA

View Full Version : Judge Orders Release of Abu Ghraib Photos


Freethinker
09-30-2005, 08:28 AM
Judge Orders Release of Abu Ghraib Photos

By LARRY NEUMEISTER, Associated Press Writer Thu Sep 29,12:43 PM ET

NEW YORK - Saying the United States "does not surrender to blackmail," a judge ruled Thursday that pictures of detainee abuse at
Iraq's
Abu Ghraib prison must be released over government claims that they could damage America's image.


U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein ordered the release of certain pictures in a 50-page decision that said terrorists in Iraq and
Afghanistan have proven they "do not need pretexts for their barbarism."

The ACLU has sought the release of 87 photographs and four videotapes taken at the prison as part of an October 2003 lawsuit demanding information on the treatment of detainees in U.S. custody and the transfer of prisoners to countries known to use torture. The ACLU contends that prisoner abuse is systemic.

The judge said: "Our nation does not surrender to blackmail, and fear of blackmail is not a legally sufficient argument to prevent us from performing a statutory command. Indeed, the freedoms that we champion are as important to our success in Iraq and Afghanistan as the guns and missiles with which our troops are armed."

The government argued that America's enemies might exploit the pictures for propaganda purposes by saying the photos represent the attitudes of all Americans toward the Iraqi people.

The judge acknowledged such a risk but said ``the education and debate that such publicity will foster will strengthen our purpose, and, by enabling such deficiencies as may be perceived to be debated and corrected, show our strength as a vibrant and functioning democracy to be emulated.''

Bridget F. Kelly, a spokeswoman for the U.S. attorney's office in Manhattan, said her office was reviewing the ruling and considering its options.

Gen. Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had argued in court papers that releasing the photographs would aid al-Qaida recruitment, weaken the Afghan and Iraqi governments and incite riots against American troops.

But the judge said: ``My task is not to defer to our worst fears, but to interpret and apply the law, in this case, the Freedom of Information Act, which advances values important to our society, transparency and accountability in government.''

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050929/ap_on_re_us/detainee_records

Spartak
09-30-2005, 08:35 AM
In Uzbekistan they boil people alive, but they're not honest/stupid (delete as appl.) enough to allow pictures of it to reach the outside world.
I think the fact that we've seen the pictures reflects well on the US, and the fact that the abuses were already well reported but ignored (I saw them listed by relatives outside Abu Ghraib on a BBC documentary from inside Iraq several months before the pictures were shown) reflects rather badly on the world.
Torture? Doesn't matter, apparently.
Milder abuse, but with colour pictures? Worldwide outrage.

Not good.

500lbguerilla
09-30-2005, 09:48 AM
In Uzbekistan they boil people alive, but they're not honest/stupid (delete as appl.) enough to allow pictures of it to reach the outside world. yeah but the US was brazen enough to keep sending money to them as well as exporting victims for them to torture. "Our nation does not surrender to blackmail, and fear of blackmail is not a legally sufficient argument to prevent us from performing a statutory command. Indeed, the freedoms that we champion are as important to our success in Iraq and Afghanistan as the guns and missiles with which our troops are armed." This judge is one smart mofo.

Spartak
09-30-2005, 10:12 AM
Originally posted by 500lbguerilla
yeah but the US was brazen enough to keep sending money to them as well as exporting victims for them to torture. This judge is one smart mofo. We're even worse - we've recalled our ambassador from Uzbekistan because he openly criticised the torture of political opponents, and the Government has levelled false accusations against him to suspend him from work.
HM Govt doesn't like its own citizens using freedom of speech to speak out against torture.
BTW the wife of the UK PM is a 'Human Rights' lawyer.
:rolleyes: