PDA

View Full Version : New evidence on Pentagon plain crash?


Decka
08-26-2005, 04:24 AM
Now i didn't know if it was POLITICS to put this thread in, but it seemed the most logical.......

I just got done listening to a brilliant give and take on George Noorey about the Pentago plain crash.

And while nothing more than "where did the wreckage go" has been brought up as evidence to support this conspiracy.... i heard some EYE POPPING insight that would indeed be a "smoking gun" about a cover-up on the pentagon.

It was brought up that a new study showed that radiation levels are HUNDREDS of times higher than they should be around the wing of the pentagon where the supposed 757 hit, and that tape shows that during the clean-up, helpers were wearing yellow boots and rinsing off their feet everytime they went in and out of the zone......

wow....

Now i cannot confirm this information as fact, i'll have to google it or do my own research, its just what some guy SAID was fact... and we all know how that goes.

There is already SUSPISION about what happened at the pentagon... tapes are not being released, and also a gas station camera nearby was taken which caught a glimpse of the crash.

The whole "where did the wreckage go" arguement cannot be actually a solid arguement... because we don't know how fast the plane was going. Hell, when i rode my bike into a car, it scrunched up like an acordion..... imagine what a 757 would do if it smashed into the ground going full speed? There wouldn't be much left.... but that's just my take.

I say if this stuff that came out is true... then there really is no doubt something is going on.... but that's a big "if".

Decka
08-26-2005, 04:26 AM
......

but also, a guy called in claiming to be an eye witness to the crash, and actually SAW the 757 hit the pentagon....

he was a saergent and had a badge number and everything....

damn wish i could go back and listen.

guess it could go either way.

korg
08-26-2005, 12:02 PM
Originally posted by Decka

The whole "where did the wreckage go" arguement cannot be actually a solid arguement... because we don't know how fast the plane was going. Hell, when i rode my bike into a car, it scrunched up like an acordion..... imagine what a 757 would do if it smashed into the ground going full speed? There wouldn't be much left.... but that's just my take.

yeah you are right, i mean look at all of the other crashes that left a lot of crash parts, they were probably going only half the speed.........huh deck ole buddy.......get a clue, a plane is NOT A TEN SPEED !!!! too much spongebob squarepants

Decka
08-26-2005, 04:52 PM
Originally posted by korg
yeah you are right, i mean look at all of the other crashes that left a lot of crash parts, they were probably going only half the speed.........huh deck ole buddy.......get a clue, a plane is NOT A TEN SPEED !!!! too much spongebob squarepants

thats the thing... we DONT KNOW how fast it was going... so don't try to make facts out of YOUR theory....

and NO SHIT a plane is NOT a ten speed... but i'm just demonstrating what happens when something moving hits something that isn't.....

and there WERE parts to be seen... there was an engine and other stuff.... but there is question as to whether or not it was a 757 engine.

Vilepagan
08-26-2005, 05:07 PM
Decka, take a look at the pictures on this site and tell me you don't believe a 757 hit the Pentagon.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html

LionelHutz
08-26-2005, 09:06 PM
Originally posted by Decka
thats the thing... we DONT KNOW how fast it was going...

Sure we do - they found the black box. Oh wait, it was planted by the government.


Originally posted by Decka
but there is question as to whether or not it was a 757 engine.

That's easy too - while most engine types are used on more than one plane, each plane usually gets its own specialized variant.