http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&oi=news&start=0&num=3&q=http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/13/national/12cnd-jackson.html

I have to admit to hoping they'd find him guilty.....just so I did not have to listen to every mouth-breathing racist dickhead in the South bitch for the next 20 years.

lmao, yeah, i guess you're right. i didnt think he did it, but thought his weirdness would burn him. hats off to the jury for thinking further ahead than i did

All of Eastern Europe is rejoicing!

Originally posted by LionelHutz
All of Eastern Europe is rejoicing!

?????

Why?

Does he have a large fan base there...??

....uh what?

did you see the fan release the Dove? I bet the Dove was relieved - what would have happened to the dove if it had been 20 years breaking rocks?

His main fan base is now outside the US apparently.

Originally posted by Freethinker
Does he have a large fan base there...??

Yes, quite large. I have no idea why.

I'm glad he was found not guilty. I believed he was innocent all the time. Go Michael, Go Michael!!!

Originally posted by M&Mdelite
Go Michael, Go Michael!!!
Rape the kiddies, Rape the kiddies!!!

LOL Prae....

i really dont give a crap about Micheal Jackson, Whether he was convicted innocent or guilty, he is a child molesting icon either way.... way to go Micheal

I dont think he did it. He's weird, but not a rapist. YAY, PARTY TIME!

Even the jury said they were pretty certain he was a child molester.

Michael is no rapist, but the boy's Mom should be arrested for child neglect. I hope Michael choosees his friends better, and hope he never helps another person. It's better to burn your money than to trust a money-hungry moron.

You are right - he's not a rapist. He's a child sex offender - one who has not been convicted - but one that has paid over $50 million so far to support his desire for young boys.

Originally posted by DrewM
You are right - he's not a rapist. He's a child sex offender - one who has not been convicted - but one that has paid over $50 million so far to support his desire for young boys.

You may be right, but if he was going to spend $50 Million to satisfy his desires, why didn't he just buy himself a young boy or two?

he basically did

Originally posted by mad dog
he basically did
:)

Just think, in Southeast Asia, he could get so much tail - it'd be like boy band ass for him, and probably at a fraction of the cost no less.

when it came out that the preist were molesting, hundreds of people came out of the woodwork. they say that MJ has been molesting since the late 80's early 90's. how come no 23 or 26 year old men have come out and said something to protect the others ? because he never did it ! pedophilia is a sickness that cant be stopped. if he was the molester that everyone is saying, where's the long line of victims ? and dont say he paid them all off. there were only 2 paid, and thats because his lawyers told him that it wasnt worth the trouble. ! men know, that there is nothing worst that you can call an adult, than a molester. to say that you know for a FACT that he did it, does terrible injustice to "innocent til proven guilty " ! what is that, just another one of america's lies ? the man was given a trial. and like i said before, and i'll use a different person: if that was will smith, and not michael jackson, people would have been talking about how dirty and seedy that mother seems. and her whole family, including that so called victim !

Okay Korg, fair enough, but the circumstances regarding Michael Jackson aren't only bizarre, they're downright incriminating. Any man who continues to mollycoddle young boys despite being told by countless advisors he's committing career and financial suicide by doing so has issues. This has nothing to do with racism; the man painted himself a target, and he deserves everything he gets. He was told not to have children around unsupervised and he did anyway. Dumb...yeah, it was. He should have figured that out after the first payoff was made. Then again, if he actually does have a problem, well then, why would he change??? This is my core reason for thinking he's guilty as sin - the magic 8-ball says all signs point to "yes".

Originally posted by Decka
Whether he was convicted innocent or guilty, he is a child molesting icon either way.... way to go Micheal

In the same vein, whether he was convicted of it or not, Ronald Reagan (among numerous other traitorous acts) sold arms to terrorists to fund an illegal war in South America.

Which is IMO roughly 10,000 times as aggregious, criminal and lethal (in terms of the number of people who lost their lives because of it) than anything Michael Jackson did.

Yet millions of rightwingers in this country will in the coming months natter on and on endlessly about Jackson not being convicted, after their having, in the past, willfully turned a blind eye to some of the biggest crimes in history by people in the highest positions of power (Iran-Contra, the massive Savings and Loan scandal, the Wed-Tech influence peddling scandal, cocaine use by presidential candidates, rich-boy politicians who avoided the draft yet who later tried to assassinate the character of people who were actually IN combat in VietNam, lying to dupe a nation full of simpletons into going to war, to name but a few) that are many times as despicable and dishonest and detestable.

This has nothing to do with racism; the man painted himself...

Yep, he painted himself white.

I'm not sure if he was guilty in this specific case, but he does appear to be a molester. If he was normal, I think this would be a wake-up call for him to change his behavior but he is so strange that I don't think he believes he's doing anything wrong.

Originally posted by dnamertz
......... I don't think he believes he's doing anything wrong.

YES! That is it exactly because as Michael told Bashir "The most loving thing you can do for another person is to share your bed with them." He doesn't seem to comprehend that these are CHILDREN and that he is an ADULT.

He absolutely thinks he did nothing wrong...he is ten too... he stopped developing emotionally at a very young age and he is stuck there. He thinks he's Peter Pan.

Originally posted by The Praetorian
Okay Korg, fair enough, but the circumstances regarding Michael Jackson aren't only bizarre, they're downright incriminating. Any man who continues to mollycoddle young boys despite being told by countless advisors he's committing career and financial suicide by doing so has issues. This has nothing to do with racism; the man painted himself a target, and he deserves everything he gets. He was told not to have children around unsupervised and he did anyway. Dumb...yeah, it was. He should have figured that out after the first payoff was made. Then again, if he actually does have a problem, well then, why would he change??? This is my core reason for thinking he's guilty as sin - the magic 8-ball says all signs point to "yes". where in hell did i mention race !?? if anything isnt racial, this isnt ! dont put words in my mouth. the only incriminating thing about this is his naive way of looking at the world. what you have here is a guy who is trying to recapture a childhood that he didnt have. wrong way to go about it ? i dont know. to him its innocent. to him, he knows that he didnt do anything. here's a scenerio : you have a neighbor. he has a cute daughter who happens to be 12. she also happens to be more advanced of the ways of the world than most kids. you go next door to visit the father. she says he isnt home, but you can come in anyway. you say no, like a responsible adult. the next thing you know, the cops are at your door. the first question they ask yyou is " were you , at any time , at your neighbors house today " . you say yes. out comes the handcuffs. you're under arrest. why? you ask. the young girl says that you fondled her........no dna, no sign of anything. your word against hers......even if you win, your life is over, and do you know why, because the world needs someone to hate. they dont even care that you were found innocent. you are a marked man....for life, because people are more judgemental than the system you just went through. there are marks of a pedophile, and he doesnt fit them. he just looks weird, which if that were the case, no preist would be in jail, but all funny looking people would be. just a modern day witch hunt. people forget, he didnt say that he sleeps in the same bed with the boys, he said that he shares his bed with them. there is a difference. he said tha the only boy he actually climbed in the bed with, was this kid, and only because the kid asked him to. people take a statement and run with it. i dont care about michael jackson, but i hate the fact that people like that family find ways to sue VICTIMS that are vulnerable.....like mike !

Originally posted by dnamertz
Yep, he painted himself white.

I'm not sure if he was guilty in this specific case, but he does appear to be a molester. If he was normal, I think this would be a wake-up call for him to change his behavior but he is so strange that I don't think he believes he's doing anything wrong. but if HE knows that he didnt do anything, he's just looking at that family saying "all people cant be like this". if anything THATS the lesson he's learning. he is a good person. he pays cancer bills. put on shows for these kids....etc. and, AGAIN, WHY ARENT THERE 23 TO 26 YEAR OLD GUYS COMING OUT OF THE WOODWORK SAYING THAT HE TOUCHED THEM, if he's been doing this since the 90's ? a pedophile take year long breaks ? no, they keep on molesting......ask a preist !! there would be A line of men saying that he did something. you guys arent thinking. 3 boys in 15 years. all with seedy ass parents. the first boys father asked michael for 5 million to fund a movie project. mike said no to the guy.......here comes a molestation case.....but nothing seems funny about that ! mike settled because thats what he was told to do !

Originally posted by ~Sal~
YES! That is it exactly because as Michael told Bashir "The most loving thing you can do for another person is to share your bed with them." He doesn't seem to comprehend that these are CHILDREN and that he is an ADULT.

He absolutely thinks he did nothing wrong...he is ten too... he stopped developing emotionally at a very young age and he is stuck there. He thinks he's Peter Pan. once again, to him, share your bed means that you let them sleep in it !!!!! he only climbed in the bed with one child, this boy, and he said that it was because the boy asked him to. and he was clothed. now if you are going to believe what he said in that interview, believe it all !!

THIS BOYS MOTHER, HAD HER DAUGHTER LIE ABOUT HER OWN FATHER MOLESTING HER. JUST BECAUSE THE MOTHER WAS MAD !!!!! PIT HER DAUGHTER AGAINST HER OWN FATHER !!! noooooo this isnt fishy !

Originally posted by Freethinker
In the same vein, whether he was convicted of it or not, Ronald Reagan (among numerous other traitorous acts) sold arms to terrorists to fund an illegal war in South America.

Which is IMO roughly 10,000 times as aggregious, criminal and lethal (in terms of the number of people who lost their lives because of it) than anything Michael Jackson did.

Yet millions of rightwingers in this country will in the coming months natter on and on endlessly about Jackson not being convicted, after their having, in the past, willfully turned a blind eye to some of the biggest crimes in history by people in the highest positions of power (Iran-Contra, the massive Savings and Loan scandal, the Wed-Tech influence peddling scandal, cocaine use by presidential candidates, rich-boy politicians who avoided the draft yet who later tried to assassinate the character of people who were actually IN combat in VietNam, lying to dupe a nation full of simpletons into going to war, to name but a few) that are many times as despicable and dishonest and detestable.
Even in a thread about Michael Jackson?!?! You ought to be ashamed of yourself, FT. :)

Originally posted by The Praetorian
Even in a thread about Michael Jackson?!?! You ought to be ashamed of yourself, FT. :) i dont know how FT managed to do it, but he found a way...:@@: